University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name EEOC v. MCCORMICK AND SCHMICK'S RESTAURANT CORP EE-NY-0099
Docket / Court 1:06-cv-07806-DC ( S.D.N.Y. )
State/Territory New York
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization EEOC
Case Summary
The New York office of the EEOC brought this suit against McCormick & Schmick's Restaurant Corp. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in September 2006. While we do not have a copy of the complaint, it ostensibly alleged that the defendant discriminated against ... read more >
The New York office of the EEOC brought this suit against McCormick & Schmick's Restaurant Corp. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in September 2006. While we do not have a copy of the complaint, it ostensibly alleged that the defendant discriminated against employees based on their race, African American, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. After some discovery and a discovery dispute, the judge denied the parties' request for a settlement conference. Subsequently, however, the parties settled the case in March 2008 by entry of a consent decree.

The decree included non-discrimination and non-retaliation clauses, required the development of an anti-discrimination policy, and required the posting and distribution of the anti-discrimination policy. The decree also required McCormick & Schmick's Restaurant Corp. to provide no fewer than two hours of training in Federal laws prohibiting discrimination in employment for all employees at its New York City restaurant. The consent decree also recognized that the defendant had clarified and expanded its website and toll-free telephone number to make clear that they are available for reporting incidents of employment discrimination, harassment, or retaliation. The EEOC maintained the ability to monitor and review compliance with the consent decree. Furthermore, the decree required the defendant to provide a report to the EEOC thirty days before the expiration of the decree regarding any complaints by employees in the New York City restaurant about discrimination on the basis of race. The defendant was also required to appoint an Equal Employment Office Coordinator to investigate discrimination complaints. The injunctive parts of the decree had a term ending on September 30, 2009. If the EEOC found non-compliance, the decree called for court enforcement. In addition, McCormick & Schmick's Restaurant Corp. agreed to pay the three complainants $20,000, $6,000 and $4,000 respectively. The decree was to last for 18 months. The docket sheet doesn't show any further enforcement took place; the case was presumably closed in 2009.

Justin Kanter - 05/28/2008
- 06/11/2017


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Content of Injunction
Discrimination Prohibition
Implement complaint/dispute resolution process
Monitoring
Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law
Provide antidiscrimination training
Reporting
Retaliation Prohibition
Discrimination-area
Other Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc)
Discrimination-basis
Race discrimination
EEOC-centric
Direct Suit on Merits
General
Disparate Treatment
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Race
Black
Causes of Action Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000e
Defendant(s) McCormick & Schmick's Restaurant Corp.
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations EEOC
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Damages
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Settlement
Form of Settlement Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration 2008 - 2009
Case Closing Year 2009
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Microsoft Gender Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit
Date: Oct. 14, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Age Discrimination Class Action seeks Fair Employment for Older PwC Applicants
http://www.pwcagecase.com/
Date: Apr. 27, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Smith Barney Gender Discrimination
https://www.lieffcabraser.com/employment/smith-barney/
Date: August 2008
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Date: Mar. 1, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
Date: Apr. 1, 2001
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
1:06-cv-07806-DC (S.D.N.Y.)
EE-NY-0099-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/17/2008
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Consent Decree
EE-NY-0099-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/17/2008

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -