Case: EEOC v. Bell Gas, Inc.

1:02-cv-01090 | U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico

Filed Date: Aug. 29, 2002

Closed Date: 2004

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On August 29, 2002, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico against Bell Gas, Inc. and related corporations on behalf of a female employee. The EEOC alleged that the companies had violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000e et. seq.) by subjecting the employee to a sexually hostile work environment created by verbal and physical harassment from her immediate supervisor, including sexual ass…

On August 29, 2002, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico against Bell Gas, Inc. and related corporations on behalf of a female employee. The EEOC alleged that the companies had violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000e et. seq.) by subjecting the employee to a sexually hostile work environment created by verbal and physical harassment from her immediate supervisor, including sexual assault. The EEOC further alleged that Bell Gas had unlawfully retaliated against the employee by constructively discharging her (she was supposedly offered a transfer but was given no further information). The EEOC sought its costs, and monetary and injunctive relief for the employee, including reform of policies and practices, back pay, reinstatement, front pay, job search expenses, compensation for emotional harm, and punitive damages.

The Court (Judge William P. Johnson) approved the employee's motion to intervene in the case on December 23, 2002. Adding her former supervisor as a defendant, she brought claims for violation of Title VII, sexual assault and battery, and several other violations of New Mexico law. She sought substantially the same relief as the EEOC.

The Court clerk made an entry of default against Bell Gas for its failure to respond to the EEOC's complaint, but the default was set aside upon the Court's subsequent finding that the untimely response was an honest mistake. The employee's supervisor represented himself.

After a fair amount of discovery disagreement the parties reached a settlement, which the Court entered as a consent decree on April 6, 2004. Under the agreement the employee received a total of $180,000; $60,000 up front and monthly payments of $2,000 for 60 months, secured by a mortgage lien on Defendants' property. The decree required Defendants to implement policies to keep the workplace free of sex discrimination and foster complaint lodging without retaliation, to distribute the sexual harassment policies to all employees, to provide annual training on avoiding sex-discrimination, harassment, and retaliation, to conduct complaint-investigation training, and to report to the EEOC. The docket shows no further court activity, and the case is now closed.

Summary Authors

Kenneth Gray (7/25/2013)

Related Cases

EEOC v. Bell Gas and Ballew Distributing, District of New Mexico (2002)

EEOC v. Bell Gas, Inc. (AWC Propane), District of New Mexico (2002)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5146150/parties/eeoc-v-bell-gas-inc/


Judge(s)

Johnson, William Paul (New Mexico)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Medina, Loretta (New Mexico)

Attorney for Defendant

Komer, Mark E (New Mexico)

Long, Nancy Ruth (New Mexico)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Kennedy, Joseph P. (New Mexico)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:02-cv-01090

Docket (PACER)

April 6, 2004

April 6, 2004

Docket
1

1:02-cv-01090

Complaint

Aug. 29, 2002

Aug. 29, 2002

Complaint
20

1:02-cv-01090

Complaint in Intervention

Jan. 15, 2003

Jan. 15, 2003

Complaint
27

1:02-cv-01090

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Feb. 13, 2003

Feb. 13, 2003

Order/Opinion
101

1:02-cv-01090

Order [Regarding Discovery Motions]

Aug. 4, 2003

Aug. 4, 2003

Order/Opinion
114

1:02-cv-01090

Order [Regarding Plaintiff-in-Intervention's Motion to Compel]

Dec. 24, 2003

Dec. 24, 2003

Order/Opinion
125

1:02-cv-01090

Consent Decree

EEOC & Christine Romero v. Bell Gas, Inc., et al

April 6, 2004

April 6, 2004

Settlement Agreement

EEOC Litigation Settlement Report (April 2004)

No Court

April 30, 2004

April 30, 2004

Press Release

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5146150/eeoc-v-bell-gas-inc/

Last updated Aug. 18, 2025, 12:37 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
27

MEMORANDUM, OPINION, AND ORDER: by District Judge William P. Johnson granting deft's motion to set aside clerk's entry of default [13-1] [11-1], denying pltf's motion for entry of default [9-1] & to strike deft's answer [18-1] (cc: all counsel*) (vv)

Feb. 13, 2003

Feb. 13, 2003

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: New Mexico

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 29, 2002

Closing Date: 2004

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of a female employee

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Bell Gas, Inc., Private Entity/Person

A-X Propane, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Cortez Gas Company, Private Entity/Person

Black Gold Energy Corporation d/b/a A-X Express Mart, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

State law

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Amount Defendant Pays: $180,000

Order Duration: 2004 - 2006

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit