Case: EEOC v. Bay State Milling Company

2:12-cv-14439 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Filed Date: Dec. 10, 2012

Closed Date: Aug. 18, 2014

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

After an unsuccessful attempt to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process, on January 25, 2013, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The EEOC alleged violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA") and the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") against Bay State Milling Company. Specifically, the EEOC alleged that the defendant discriminated against a qualifie…

After an unsuccessful attempt to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process, on January 25, 2013, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The EEOC alleged violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA") and the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") against Bay State Milling Company. Specifically, the EEOC alleged that the defendant discriminated against a qualified applicant when the hiring manager rejected him because of his age. The hiring manager informed the applicant of the company's desire to hire a younger individual for the job. The company ultimately hired a 22-year-old with less experience than the applicant. The EEOC sought injunctive and monetary relief as well reinstatement of the affected individual. District Judge Donald L. Graham was assigned to this case.

The parties agreed upon a settlement agreement on November 12, 2013. The two-year consent decree settling the lawsuit, approved by the court on December 10, 2013, included injunctive relief to ban the defendant from considering age as a factor when making hiring decisions, mandatory training for the hiring manager, and interviewing officials and the company's human resources department, with an emphasis on age-related discriminatory practices and age sensitivity. The decree also provided for a number of reporting requirements, subjecting the company to additional monitoring by the EEOC for a period of two years. The monetary award was $80,185.66, which included back pay and liquidated damages.

On May 5, 2014, the individual plaintiff moved to vacate the settlement, proceeding pro se because of a dispute in the settlement amount. The defendant opposed the plaintiff’s motion.

On July 25, 2014, the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman who issued a Report and Recommendation. On August 17, 2014, District Judge Graham adopted the Magistrate’s reports. He denied the plaintiff’s motion to vacate the settlement agreement and granted in part and denied in part the defendant’s motion to enforce settlement by: (i) ordering the plaintiff to execute a W-9 form; (ii) requiring defendant to, as soon as practicable, pay the plaintiff after he provides defendant with his W-9 form; and (iii) denying defendant's request for attorney's fees.

This case is closed.

Summary Authors

Susie Choi (3/8/2017)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:13-cv-14032

Docket [PACER]

Legore v. Bay State Milling Company

Aug. 18, 2014

Aug. 18, 2014

Docket

2:12-cv-14439

Docket [PACER]

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bay State Milling Company

Aug. 18, 2014

Aug. 18, 2014

Docket

2:12-cv-14439

Docket

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bay State Milling Company

Aug. 18, 2014

Aug. 18, 2014

Docket
1

2:12-cv-14439

Complaint

Dec. 10, 2012

Dec. 10, 2012

Complaint
1

2:13-cv-14032

Complaint

Legore v. Bay State Milling Company

Jan. 25, 2013

Jan. 25, 2013

Complaint
37

2:12-cv-14439

Order on Defendant's Motion to Compel

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bay State Milling Co.

June 18, 2013

June 18, 2013

Order/Opinion
34

2:13-cv-14032

Amended Complaint

Legore v. Bay State Milling Company

Aug. 23, 2013

Aug. 23, 2013

Complaint
70

2:12-cv-14439

Consent Decree

Dec. 10, 2013

Dec. 10, 2013

Order/Opinion

Bay State Milling Company to Pay $80K to Settle EEOC Hiring Discrimination Case

[NA]

No Court

Dec. 11, 2013

Dec. 11, 2013

Press Release
91

2:12-cv-14439

2:13-cv-14032

Order and Omnibus Report and Recommendations on Cross-Motions Regarding Vacating or Enforcing Settlement

July 25, 2014

July 25, 2014

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4234740/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-bay-state-milling-company/

Last updated April 8, 2025, 11:16 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against Bay State Milling Company. Filing fee $ 350.00. USA Filer - No Filing Fee Required, filed by Eeoc. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summon(s))(Golson, Aarrin) (Entered: 12/10/2012)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Summon(s)

View on PACER

Dec. 10, 2012

Dec. 10, 2012

Clearinghouse
2

Judge Assignment to Judge Donald L. Graham and Magistrate Judge Frank J. Lynch, Jr (tpl) (Entered: 12/10/2012)

Dec. 10, 2012

Dec. 10, 2012

3

Summons Issued as to Bay State Milling Company. (tpl) (Entered: 12/10/2012)

Dec. 10, 2012

Dec. 10, 2012

4

Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorneys James L. Lee and Gwendolyn Y. Reams, mailing date December 11, 2012. (ksa) (Entered: 12/11/2012)

Dec. 11, 2012

Dec. 11, 2012

5

Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Bay State Milling Company.(Schwartz, Jennifer) (Entered: 01/02/2013)

Jan. 2, 2013

Jan. 2, 2013

RECAP
6

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kim M. Lucas on behalf of Bay State Milling Company (Lucas, Kim) (Entered: 01/02/2013)

Jan. 2, 2013

Jan. 2, 2013

7

Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bay State Milling Company (Schwartz, Jennifer) (Entered: 01/02/2013)

Jan. 2, 2013

Jan. 2, 2013

8

ORDER Setting Status Conference: Telephonic Status Conference set for 2/6/2013 02:00 PM before Judge Donald L. Graham. Signed by Judge Donald L. Graham on 1/4/2013. (lbc) (Entered: 01/07/2013)

Jan. 4, 2013

Jan. 4, 2013

9

Clerk's Notice of Undeliverable Mail re 2 Judge Assignment. US Mail returned for: Attorney P. David Lopez . The Court has not located an updated address for this party. After two unsuccessful noticing attempts, notices from the Court will no longer be sent to this party in this case until a correct address is provided. (cqs) (Entered: 01/08/2013)

Jan. 8, 2013

Jan. 8, 2013

10

NOTICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission of Pending Similar Action (Golson, Aarrin) (Entered: 01/31/2013)

Jan. 31, 2013

Jan. 31, 2013

11

STATUS REPORT by Bay State Milling Company, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Schwartz, Jennifer) (Entered: 01/31/2013)

Jan. 31, 2013

Jan. 31, 2013

12

CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Bay State Milling Company, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Lucas, Kim) (Entered: 01/31/2013)

Jan. 31, 2013

Jan. 31, 2013

13

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Donald L. Graham: Status Conference held on 2/6/2013. Court Reporter: Carly Horenkamp, 305-523-5138 / Carleen_Horenkamp@flsd.uscourts.gov (cf) (Entered: 02/06/2013)

Feb. 6, 2013

Feb. 6, 2013

14

SCHEDULING ORDER. Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 10/16/2013 02:00 PM before Judge Donald L. Graham. Jury Trial set for 11/18/2013 before Judge Donald L. Graham. Telephonic Calendar Call set for 11/13/2013 02:00 PM before Judge Donald L. Graham. Amended Pleadings due by 5/24/2013. Discovery due by 8/30/2013. Joinder of Parties due by 5/24/2013. Motions due by 9/9/2013. Pretrial Stipulation due by 10/11/2013. Notice of Court Practice. Signed by Judge Donald L. Graham on 2/20/2013. (lbc) (Entered: 02/21/2013)

Feb. 20, 2013

Feb. 20, 2013

15

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Signed by Judge Donald L. Graham on 2/20/2013. (lbc) (Entered: 02/21/2013)

Feb. 20, 2013

Feb. 20, 2013

16

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Frank J. Lynch, Jr for Discovery Proceedings. Signed by Judge Donald L. Graham on 2/20/2013. (lbc) (Entered: 02/21/2013)

Feb. 20, 2013

Feb. 20, 2013

17

Notice of Mediation Hearing before Mediator, Cori Flam Meltzer filed by Cori Flam Meltzer. Mediation Hearing set for 3/8/2013 09:30 AM (Meltzer, Cori) (Entered: 02/27/2013)

Feb. 27, 2013

Feb. 27, 2013

18

ORDER Scheduling Mediation before Cathleen Scott. Mediation Hearing set for 3/8/2013 09:30 AM. Signed by Judge Donald L. Graham on 2/28/2013. (lbc) (Entered: 02/28/2013)

Feb. 28, 2013

Feb. 28, 2013

19

Clerk's Notice of Undeliverable Mail re 8 Order Setting Status Conference. US Mail returned for: ATTORNEY P. DAVID LOPEZ . The Court has not located an updated address for this party. After two unsuccessful noticing attempts, notices from the Court will no longer be sent to this party in this case until a correct address is provided. (lbc) (Entered: 03/08/2013)

March 8, 2013

March 8, 2013

20

Clerk's Notice of Undeliverable Mail re 13 Status Conference. US Mail returned for: ATTORNEY P. DAVID LOPEZ . The Court has not located an updated address for this party. After two unsuccessful noticing attempts, notices from the Court will no longer be sent to this party in this case until a correct address is provided. (lbc) (Entered: 03/11/2013)

March 11, 2013

March 11, 2013

21

FINAL MEDIATION REPORT by Cori Flam Meltzer. Disposition: Case did not settle.(Meltzer, Cori) (Entered: 03/12/2013)

March 12, 2013

March 12, 2013

22

Motion to Compel

1 Exhibit A - Discovery Requests

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B - EEOC Letter

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C - Notice of Deposition

View on PACER

4 Exhibit D - March 12 Letter

View on PACER

5 Exhibit E - March 20 Letter

View on PACER

6 Exhibit F - March 26 e-mail

View on PACER

7 Exhibit G - March 27 e-mail

View on PACER

8 Exhibit H - March 28 e-mail

View on PACER

9 Exhibit I - March 29 e-mail

View on PACER

10 Exhibit J - April 1 e-mail

View on PACER

April 2, 2013

April 2, 2013

23

Order

April 3, 2013

April 3, 2013

24

Response in Opposition to Motion

April 10, 2013

April 10, 2013

25

Reply to Response to Motion

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

April 10, 2013

April 10, 2013

26

Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order for Extension of Time

View on PACER

April 10, 2013

April 10, 2013

27

Response to Motion

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C

View on PACER

4 Exhibit D

View on PACER

April 10, 2013

April 10, 2013

29

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

April 10, 2013

April 10, 2013

28

Order on Motion to Compel

April 11, 2013

April 11, 2013

30

Notice of Attorney Appearance

April 11, 2013

April 11, 2013

31

Order

April 12, 2013

April 12, 2013

32

Motion to Compel

1 Exhibit A - Discovery Requests

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B - Letter

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C - Discovery Responses

View on PACER

4 Exhibit D - Privilege Logs

View on PACER

5 Exhibit E - Letter

View on PACER

6 Exhibit F - Letter

View on PACER

7 Exhibit G - Email

View on PACER

8 Exhibit H - Letter

View on PACER

9 Exhibit I - Email

View on PACER

10 Exhibit J - Supplemental Discovery Responses

View on PACER

11 Exhibit K - Email

View on PACER

12 Exhibit L - Email

View on PACER

May 24, 2013

May 24, 2013

33

Motion for Extension of Time

June 4, 2013

June 4, 2013

34

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

June 4, 2013

June 4, 2013

35

Response in Opposition to Motion

1 Exhibit A - Email 3/27

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B - Email 4/22

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C - Affidavit

View on PACER

4 Exhibit D - Privelege Log

View on PACER

5 Exhibit E - Chair Declaration

View on PACER

6 Exhibit F - Email 5/8

View on PACER

June 10, 2013

June 10, 2013

36

Reply to Response to Motion

1 Exhibit A - Email

View on PACER

June 14, 2013

June 14, 2013

37

Order on Motion to Compel

June 18, 2013

June 18, 2013

Clearinghouse
38

Motion for Extension of Time

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Sept. 5, 2013

Sept. 5, 2013

39

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

Sept. 9, 2013

Sept. 9, 2013

40

Motion for Summary Judgment

Sept. 16, 2013

Sept. 16, 2013

41

Statement

Sept. 16, 2013

Sept. 16, 2013

42

Notice (Other)

1 Exhibit A - Excerpts - Legore

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B - Excerpts - Hawkes

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C - Excerpts - Galluzzo

View on PACER

4 Exhibit D - Excerpts - Long

View on PACER

5 Exhibit E - Excerpts - Wunderly

View on PACER

6 Exhibit F - Excerpts - Dooley

View on PACER

7 Exhibit G - Excerpts - Raiola

View on PACER

8 Exhibit H - Affidavit - Raiola

View on PACER

Sept. 16, 2013

Sept. 16, 2013

43

Motion for Extension of Time

Sept. 18, 2013

Sept. 18, 2013

44

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

Sept. 19, 2013

Sept. 19, 2013

45

Motion to Stay

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

2 Exhibit

View on PACER

Oct. 1, 2013

Oct. 1, 2013

46

Order on Motion to Stay

Oct. 3, 2013

Oct. 3, 2013

47

Order Cancelling Deadline/Hearing

Oct. 15, 2013

Oct. 15, 2013

48

Order Lifting Stay

Oct. 17, 2013

Oct. 17, 2013

49

Scheduling Order

Oct. 17, 2013

Oct. 17, 2013

50

Notice (Other)

Oct. 23, 2013

Oct. 23, 2013

51

Response in Opposition to Motion

Oct. 23, 2013

Oct. 23, 2013

52

Statement

Oct. 23, 2013

Oct. 23, 2013

53

Notice (Other)

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

2 Exhibit

View on PACER

3 Exhibit

View on PACER

4 Exhibit

View on PACER

5 Exhibit

View on PACER

6 Exhibit

View on PACER

7 Exhibit

View on PACER

8 Exhibit

View on PACER

9 Exhibit

View on PACER

10 Exhibit

View on PACER

11 Exhibit

View on PACER

12 Exhibit

View on PACER

13 Exhibit

View on PACER

14 Exhibit

View on PACER

15 Exhibit

View on PACER

16 Exhibit

View on PACER

17 Exhibit

View on PACER

18 Exhibit

View on PACER

19 Exhibit

View on PACER

20 Exhibit

View on PACER

21 Exhibit

View on PACER

22 Exhibit

View on PACER

23 Exhibit

View on PACER

24 Exhibit

View on PACER

25 Exhibit

View on PACER

26 Exhibit

View on PACER

27 Exhibit

View on PACER

28 Exhibit

View on PACER

29 Exhibit

View on PACER

30 Exhibit

View on PACER

31 Exhibit

View on PACER

32 Exhibit

View on PACER

33 Exhibit

View on PACER

34 Exhibit

View on PACER

Oct. 23, 2013

Oct. 23, 2013

Attorney Kim M. Lucas terminated PER DE 50 . (lbc) (Entered: 10/23/2013)

Oct. 23, 2013

Oct. 23, 2013

54

Notice (Other)

Oct. 24, 2013

Oct. 24, 2013

55

Response in Opposition to Motion

Oct. 24, 2013

Oct. 24, 2013

56

Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

Oct. 24, 2013

Oct. 24, 2013

57

Reply to Response to Motion

Nov. 1, 2013

Nov. 1, 2013

58

Notice of Striking

Nov. 1, 2013

Nov. 1, 2013

59

Response/Reply (Other)

Nov. 1, 2013

Nov. 1, 2013

60

Scheduling Order

Nov. 4, 2013

Nov. 4, 2013

61

Notice of Attorney Appearance

Nov. 4, 2013

Nov. 4, 2013

62

Order Referring Case to Judge

Nov. 5, 2013

Nov. 5, 2013

63

Order

Nov. 5, 2013

Nov. 5, 2013

64

Motion to Consolidate Cases

Nov. 6, 2013

Nov. 6, 2013

65

Endorsed Order

Nov. 6, 2013

Nov. 6, 2013

66

Settlement Conference

Nov. 12, 2013

Nov. 12, 2013

67

Order

1 "Mediation" E-Mail

View on PACER

2 "Release" E-Mail

View on PACER

3 "Downstairs" E-Mail

View on PACER

Nov. 18, 2013

Nov. 18, 2013

68

Order

1 "Life" E-Mail

View on PACER

2 "Donna m ballman" E-Mail

View on PACER

Nov. 19, 2013

Nov. 19, 2013

69

Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

1 Exhibit Consent Decree

View on PACER

Nov. 22, 2013

Nov. 22, 2013

70

Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

Dec. 10, 2013

Dec. 10, 2013

Clearinghouse
71

Administrative Order

Dec. 27, 2013

Dec. 27, 2013

72

Motion to Continue

1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order

View on PACER

Jan. 6, 2014

Jan. 6, 2014

73

Order on Motion to Continue

Jan. 7, 2014

Jan. 7, 2014

74

Endorsed Order

Jan. 17, 2014

Jan. 17, 2014

75

Status Conference

Jan. 22, 2014

Jan. 22, 2014

76

Order

Jan. 23, 2014

Jan. 23, 2014

77

Sealed Document

Jan. 29, 2014

Jan. 29, 2014

RECAP
78

Motion to Vacate

March 5, 2014

March 5, 2014

79

Order Referring Motion

March 5, 2014

March 5, 2014

80

Order

March 6, 2014

March 6, 2014

81

Response in Opposition to Motion

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

March 10, 2014

March 10, 2014

82

Order

March 14, 2014

March 14, 2014

83

Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion

View on PACER

March 17, 2014

March 17, 2014

84

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

March 17, 2014

March 17, 2014

85

Response/Reply (Other)

1 Exhibit A: Final Consent Decree

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B: Email from Jennifer Schwartz - REDACTED

View on PACER

March 24, 2014

March 24, 2014

86

Response to Motion

1 Exhibit A: Final Consent Decree

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B: Email from Jennifer Schwartz - REDACTED

View on PACER

March 24, 2014

March 24, 2014

87

Order

March 24, 2014

March 24, 2014

88

Response/Reply (Other)

1 Exhibit A - composite

View on PACER

April 1, 2014

April 1, 2014

89

Order Referring Case to Judge

July 15, 2014

July 15, 2014

90

Transcript

July 21, 2014

July 21, 2014

91

Report and Recommendations

July 25, 2014

July 25, 2014

Clearinghouse
92

Endorsed Order

July 25, 2014

July 25, 2014

93

Notice of Compliance

July 28, 2014

July 28, 2014

94

Objections to Report and Recommendations

Aug. 6, 2014

Aug. 6, 2014

95

Order on Motion to Vacate

Aug. 18, 2014

Aug. 18, 2014

Clearinghouse

Case Details

State / Territory:

Florida

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Labor Rights

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 10, 2012

Closing Date: Aug. 18, 2014

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

EEOC

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

U.S. Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Bay State Milling Company

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219

Other Dockets:

Southern District of Florida 2:12-cv-14439

Southern District of Florida 2:13-cv-14032

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Discrimination Prohibition

Monitoring

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reinstatement (job, contract, grant, etc.)

Reporting

Retaliation Prohibition

Amount Defendant Pays: $80,185.66

Order Duration: 2013 - 2015

Issues

General/Misc.:

Pattern or Practice

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Hiring

Discrimination Basis:

Age discrimination

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit

Recommended Citation