EEOC v. Incat Systems | Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

Case Profile		new search page permalink

Case Name	EEOC v. Incat Systems	EE-MI-0088
Docket / Court	01-73461 ( E.D. Mich. )
State/Territory	Michigan
Case Type(s)	Equal Employment
Special Collection	EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization	EEOC
Case Summary	The EEOC's Detroit office filed this suit on September 10, 2001 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Detroit). The EEOC alleged that defendant Incat Systems, Incorporated violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by discharging an employee because of her age, 65. ... read more > The EEOC's Detroit office filed this suit on September 10, 2001 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Detroit). The EEOC alleged that defendant Incat Systems, Incorporated violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by discharging an employee because of her age, 65. The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on August 22, 2002. The motion was granted, after a hearing, on October 31, 2002. The EEOC appealed the judgment but voluntarily stipulated to dismissal of the appeal on December 5, 2003. Jason Chester - 03/08/2008 compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -

Issues and Causes of Action

Issues

Discrimination-area

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Discrimination-basis

Age discrimination

EEOC-centric

Direct Suit on Merits

General

Disparate Treatment

Plaintiff Type

EEOC Plaintiff

Causes of Action

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Case Details


Defendant(s)	Incat Systems, Incorporated
Plaintiff Description	Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations	EEOC
Class action status sought	No
Class action status granted	No
Prevailing Party	Defendant
Public Int. Lawyer	Yes
Nature of Relief	None
Source of Relief	None
Case Closing Year	2002
Case Ongoing	No

Additional Resources


	Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform Date: Mar 1, 2008 By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law) Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School) Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Documents

Docket(s)

2:01-cv-73461-RHC (E.D. Mich.)
EE-MI-0088-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/05/2003
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]

General Documents

Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF# 22] (E.D. Mich.) EE-MI-0088-0001.pdf \| Detail Date: 10/31/2002 Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judgment [ECF# 23] (E.D. Mich.) EE-MI-0088-0002.pdf \| Detail Date: 10/31/2002 Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Stipulation and Order Dismissing Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery [ECF# 24] (E.D. Mich.) EE-MI-0088-0003.pdf \| Detail Date: 11/13/2002 Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [USCA] [Ct. of App. ECF# 30] EE-MI-0088-0004.pdf \| Detail Date: 12/05/2003 Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]

People