EEOC v. Mtp Enterprises D/B/A H & M Limousine Service | Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

Case Profile		new search page permalink

Case Name	EEOC v. Mtp Enterprises D/B/A H & M Limousine Service	EE-IL-0166
Docket / Court	1:02-cv-06884 ( N.D. Ill. )
State/Territory	Illinois
Case Type(s)	Equal Employment
Special Collection	EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization	EEOC
Case Summary	The Chicago District Office of the EEOC brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, against MTP Enterprises, Ltd. d/b/a H & M Limousine Service. The complaint, filed in September 2002, alleged age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in ... read more > The Chicago District Office of the EEOC brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, against MTP Enterprises, Ltd. d/b/a H & M Limousine Service. The complaint, filed in September 2002, alleged age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act; specifically that the Defendant had discriminated against the charging parties in the terms and conditions of their employment and by discharging them based on their age. A consent decree was entered in March 2003. The decree, valid for 1 year, required the Defendant to pay of the charging parties $11,000, to post a notice of non-discrimination on its premises, to provide its managers and owners with EEO training, and to maintain and make available for EEOC inspection, records of each employee who complains of age discrimination. Elizabeth Glassman - 06/21/2007 compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -

Issues and Causes of Action

Issues

Content of Injunction

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Discrimination Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Recordkeeping

Reporting

Retaliation Prohibition

Discrimination-area

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Other Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc)

Discrimination-basis

Age discrimination

EEOC-centric

Direct Suit on Merits

General

Disparate Treatment

Plaintiff Type

EEOC Plaintiff

Causes of Action

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Case Details


Defendant(s)	MTP Enterprises, Ltd.
Plaintiff Description	Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations	EEOC
Class action status sought	No
Class action status granted	No
Prevailing Party	Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer	Yes
Nature of Relief	Damages Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief	Settlement
Form of Settlement	Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration	2003 - 2004
Case Closing Year	2003
Case Ongoing	No

Additional Resources


	Microsoft Gender Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit Date: Oct. 14, 2016 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Age Discrimination Class Action seeks Fair Employment for Older PwC Applicants http://www.pwcagecase.com/ Date: Apr. 27, 2016 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Smith Barney Gender Discrimination https://www.lieffcabraser.com/employment/smith-barney/ Date: August 2008 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform Date: Mar. 1, 2008 By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law) Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School) Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Documents

Docket(s)

1:02-cv-06884 (N.D. Ill.)
EE-IL-0166-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2003
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]

General Documents

Complaint EE-IL-0166-0001.pdf \| Detail Date: 09/27/2002
Consent Decree EE-IL-0166-0002.pdf \| Detail Date: 03/23/2003

People