EEOC v. LUCKY 9 CAR WASH LP, ta MR. WASH | Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

Case Profile		new search page permalink

Case Name	EEOC v. LUCKY 9 CAR WASH LP, ta MR. WASH	EE-MD-0074
Docket / Court	JFM 99-1670 ( D. Md. )
State/Territory	Maryland
Case Type(s)	Equal Employment
Special Collection	EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization	EEOC
Case Summary	In June 1999, the Baltimore District Office of the EEOC brought this lawsuit against Lucky 9 Car Wash LP, doing business as Mr. Wash, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. However, it ... read more > In June 1999, the Baltimore District Office of the EEOC brought this lawsuit against Lucky 9 Car Wash LP, doing business as Mr. Wash, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. However, it appears from the Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment that the complaint alleged that the defendant discriminated against the charging party on the basis of age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by terminating her position. Defendant's movement for summary judgment in March 2000 was granted in April 2000. The EEOC appealed the order to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Case No. 00-1852, which was dismissed in August 2000. David Friedman - 10/25/2007 compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -

Issues and Causes of Action

Issues

Discrimination-area

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Discrimination-basis

Age discrimination

EEOC-centric

Direct Suit on Merits

General

Disparate Treatment

Plaintiff Type

EEOC Plaintiff

Causes of Action

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Case Details


Defendant(s)	Lucky 9 Car Wash LP
Plaintiff Description	Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations	EEOC
Class action status sought	No
Class action status granted	No
Prevailing Party	Defendant
Public Int. Lawyer	Yes
Nature of Relief	None
Source of Relief	None
Case Closing Year	2000
Case Ongoing	No

Additional Resources


	Microsoft Gender Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit Date: Oct. 14, 2016 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Age Discrimination Class Action seeks Fair Employment for Older PwC Applicants http://www.pwcagecase.com/ Date: Apr. 27, 2016 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Smith Barney Gender Discrimination https://www.lieffcabraser.com/employment/smith-barney/ Date: August 2008 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform Date: Mar. 1, 2008 By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law Faculty) Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach Date: Apr. 1, 2001 By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School Faculty) Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Documents

Docket(s)

1:99-cv-01670-JFM (D. Md.)
EE-MD-0074-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 08/17/2000
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]

General Documents

Order [granting defendant's motion for summary judgment] (D. Md.) EE-MD-0074-0001.pdf \| Detail Date: 04/26/2000
Memorandum [judge supporting motion for summary judgment] (D. Md.) EE-MD-0074-0002.pdf \| Detail Date: 04/26/2000

People