University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name EEOC v. DAIMLERCHRYLSER CORP. EE-IN-0027
Docket / Court IP01-C-0299 -M/S ( S.D. Ind. )
State/Territory Indiana
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization EEOC
Case Summary
The Philadelphia District Office of the EEOC brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, against Daimlerchrysler Corporation, a car dealership. The complaint was filed in March 2001, but we do not have access to this document. The charging party intervened ... read more >
The Philadelphia District Office of the EEOC brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, against Daimlerchrysler Corporation, a car dealership. The complaint was filed in March 2001, but we do not have access to this document. The charging party intervened in May 2001. The EEOC and Defendants agreed to a consent decree in September 2003, but the intervenor plaintiff and Defendants went on to trial in June 2004, in which there was a jury verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant filed a motion to strike the punitive damages, which was granted in part and denied in part, after which the defendant appealed to the U.S. Circuit Court for the Seventh Circuit. The docket indicates that the parties came to an agreement after this. The jury verdict awarded $300,000 to the complainant along with $157,110.04 in fees and costs. The only document we have for this case is the docket.

Shankar Viswanathan - 06/29/2007


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
EEOC-centric
Direct Suit on Merits
Private Party intervened in EEOC suit
General
Disparate Treatment
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. ยงยง 12111 et seq.
Defendant(s) Daimlerchrysler Corporation
United Automobile Union Number 685
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations EEOC
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Damages
Source of Relief Litigation
Settlement
Case Closing Year 2003
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Microsoft Gender Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit
Date: Oct. 14, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Age Discrimination Class Action seeks Fair Employment for Older PwC Applicants
http://www.pwcagecase.com/
Date: Apr. 27, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Smith Barney Gender Discrimination
https://www.lieffcabraser.com/employment/smith-barney/
Date: August 2008
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Date: Mar. 1, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
Date: Apr. 1, 2001
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
IP01-C-0299-M/S (S.D. Ind.)
EE-IN-0027-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/20/2007
General Documents
Order on Defendant's Motion to Alter or Amend the Verdict (2004 WL 2538639 / 2004 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 22813) (S.D. Ind.)
EE-IN-0027-0001.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 10/19/2004

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -