EEOC v. SAN ANTONIO SHOE, INC. | Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

Case Profile		new search page permalink

Case Name	EEOC v. SAN ANTONIO SHOE, INC.	EE-TX-0316
Docket / Court	2:99-cv-00011-OLG ( W.D. Tex. )
State/Territory	Texas
Case Type(s)	Equal Employment
Special Collection	EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization	EEOC
Case Summary	The EEOC's San Antonio district office sued San Antonio Shoe, Inc., on March 5, 1999 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. The EEOC's cause of action is based on the defendant's violation of Title VII by discriminating based on sex (female). The defendant filed a motion ... read more > The EEOC's San Antonio district office sued San Antonio Shoe, Inc., on March 5, 1999 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. The EEOC's cause of action is based on the defendant's violation of Title VII by discriminating based on sex (female). The defendant filed a motion for partial summary judgment in January 2000 which was denied in September 2000. The parties entered into a settlement agreement on October 25, 2000, the contents of which are unknown. Aaron Weismann - 07/23/2007 compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -

Issues and Causes of Action

Issues

Affected Gender

Female

Discrimination-area

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination-basis

Sex discrimination

EEOC-centric

Direct Suit on Merits

General

Disparate Treatment

Plaintiff Type

EEOC Plaintiff

Causes of Action

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Case Details


Defendant(s)	San Antonio Shoe, Inc.
Plaintiff Description	Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations	EEOC
Class action status sought	No
Class action status granted	No
Prevailing Party	Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer	Yes
Nature of Relief	Unknown
Source of Relief	Settlement
Form of Settlement	Voluntary Dismissal
Case Closing Year	2000
Case Ongoing	No

Additional Resources


	Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform Date: Mar 1, 2008 By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law) Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School) Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Documents

Docket(s)

2:99-cv-00011-OLG (W.D. Tex.)
EE-TX-0316-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/05/2000
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]

General Documents

Order [Regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order and to Quash] [ECF# 40] (W.D. Tex.) EE-TX-0316-0004.pdf \| Detail Date: 02/04/2000 Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [re: motion to quash and motion to compel] (W.D. Tex.) EE-TX-0316-0001.pdf \| Detail Date: 03/29/2000
United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (W.D. Tex.) EE-TX-0316-0002.pdf \| Detail Date: 05/12/2000
Order Accepting Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and Denying Summary Judgment (W.D. Tex.) EE-TX-0316-0003.pdf \| Detail Date: 09/25/2000
Agreed Order of Dismissal [ECF# 75] (W.D. Tex.) EE-TX-0316-0005.pdf \| Detail Date: 10/30/2000 Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]

People


Judges	Edwards, Durwood (W.D. Tex.) [Magistrate] EE-TX-0316-0002 \| EE-TX-0316-0004