Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
27 cases
Ordered by
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Kadel v. Folwell

1:19-cv-00272 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina

Filed Date: March 11, 2019

Plaintiffs in this case challenged the State Health Plan's refusal to cover medically necessary gender affirming care. On March 11, 2019, seven private plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves or their dependents, (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), represented by Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, and private counsel, sued the State Treasurer of North Carolina, the Executive Administrator of the North Carolina State Health Plan for Teachers and State Em…
PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS/CONTRACTING
Voe v. Mansfield

1:23-cv-00864 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina

Filed Date: Oct. 11, 2023

This case involves a challenge to a North Carolina law that prohibited providing gender-affirming care to minors.  On August 16, 2023, North Carolina ratified HB 808 which prohibited healthcare professions from providing gender-affirming care to transgender minors. The ban also prohibited the use of state funds to support gender-affirming medical care. On October 11, 2023 several transgender minors, their parents, and medical professionals filed suit in the District of North Carolina against th…

Motion for Emergency or Preliminary Relief Pending

PRISON CONDITIONS
Kingdom v. Trump

1:25-cv-00691 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: March 7, 2025

President Trump issued Executive Order 14168 on January 20, 2025, just hours after taking office. Titled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,” the order mandated a categorical prohibition on federal funding for gender-affirming care and required the BOP to end all such medical treatments and accommodations for incarcerated individuals. Section 4(c) of the executive order explicitly barred any medical procedures, treatments, or…

Preliminary Injunction Granted

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
C.M. v. Collins

25-04924 | U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Filed Date: June 9, 2025

This case challenged the suspension of gender-affirming care for veterans by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs in compliance with EO 14168. Executive Order 14168, titled "Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government," was issued by President Trump In January 2025. EO 14168 aims to reverse policies related to gender identity and establish a federal policy recognizing two sexes, male and female, defined by immutable biological class…

Case Is Ongoing

HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Bernier v. Turbocam, Inc.

1:23-cv-00523 | U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire

Filed Date: Nov. 21, 2023

This case challenges the categorical exclusion of coverage for treatment of gender dysphoria and gender transition-related care under an employee health benefits plan used by Turbocam, Inc. and jointly administered by Health Plans, Inc. and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care of New England, Inc.  On November 21, 2023, Plaintiff, a transgender woman employed by Turbocam, filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire against Turbocam, HPI, and HPC. Plaintiff asserted th…

Case Is Ongoing

HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
State of California v. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

1:25-cv-12019 | U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Filed Date: July 17, 2025

The "Final Rule," officially titled “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Marketplace Integrity and Affordability,” was issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on June 25, 2025. The rule implements changes to Affordable Care Act (ACA) eligibility and enrollment processes, which HHS estimates could result in 750,000 to 2,000,000 individuals losing health coverage. Key provisions include shortening the Open Enrollment Period to nine weeks, increasing verification r…

Plaintiff States' Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Stay

State of California et al. v. Kennedy, Jr. et al.

July 17, 2025

Plaintiff States' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Stay

State of California et al. v. Kennedy, Jr., et al.

July 17, 2025

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

State of California v. Kennedy

July 17, 2025

Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion

State of California v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

July 18, 2025

Brief Of Amici Curiae National Health Law Program, Victoria Baggot, Jason Piperberg, Timothy Reyburn, Bianca Mahmood, Kenny Capps, Mariah Adeeko, American Cancer Society, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Legal Council For Health Justice, Aiarthritis, American Lung Association, The Coalition For Hemophilia B, Epilepsy Foundation Of America, Families Usa, Muscular Dystrophy Association, And National Ms Society In Support Of Plaintiff States’ Motion For A Preliminary Injunction And Stay

State of California et al. v. Kennedy, Jr. et al.

July 28, 2025

see 6 additional documents

Preliminary Injunction Granted

HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Robinson v. Dignity Health

4:16-cv-03035 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: June 6, 2016

Closed Date: April 28, 2017

This case is about discrimination by an employer whose healthcare plan for its employees did not provide coverage for gender dysphoria. On June 6, 2016 a transgender man (who was an operating room nurse) filed suit against his employer, Dignity Health (a hospital), challenging the exclusion of transition-related care from the employer’s health insurance plan. Represented by the ACLU, the plaintiff filed his lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, where the ca…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Doe v. Austin

2:22-cv-00368 | U.S. District Court for the District of Maine

Filed Date: Nov. 21, 2022

Closed Date: Jan. 8, 2025

In this case challenging the constitutionality of a 1976 federal statute that prohibits the Military Health System from providing coverage for medically necessary surgical treatments for gender dysphoria for dependents of service members, a federal district court judge held that the prohibition violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.  On December 1, 2022, a ​transgender woman receiving health insurance through the U.S. military's TRICARE program as a dependent of a former se…

Case Dismissed (Involuntary)

PUBLIC BENEFITS/GOVERNMENT SERVICES
Bruce v. State of South Dakota

5:17-cv-05080 | U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota

Filed Date: Oct. 13, 2017

Closed Date: Jan. 25, 2019

On October 13, 2017, a private plaintiff brought suit against the State of South Dakota and the Commissioner of the South Dakota Bureau of Human Resources in U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota, Western Division. Plaintiff, a transgender man who worked for state government, alleged that South Dakota’s healthcare coverage to state employees, offered through the South Dakota State Employee Health Plan (“SDSEHP”), categorically excludes medical care for gender dysphoria. Plaintiff…

Case Dismissed (Involuntary)

HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
M.H. v. Jeppesen

1:22-cv-00409 | U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho

Filed Date: Sept. 29, 2022

In 2022, plaintiffs, transgender and nonbinary Idahoans on Medicaid, sued the state, alleging Idaho Medicaid had an unwritten policy of denying or delaying gender-affirming care.  On September 29, 2022, two private transgender Medicaid plaintiffs (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), represented by Idaho Legal Aid Services, sued the Director of the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (“DDHW”), the Medical Director of the Idaho Division of Medicaid (“MDI”), and the Idaho Department of Health and Welf…