Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
15 cases
Ordered by
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Johnson v. State of Wyoming III

2025-CV-0114940 | Wyoming state trial court

Filed Date: Feb. 28, 2025

This case is a challenge to series of Wyoming state laws regulating pregnant people and abortion providers in Wyoming.  Procedural Background Plaintiffs originally filed suit in Natrona County District Court on February 28. On March 11, having not been granted a TRO hearing, plaintiffs dismissed that case and refiled in Teton County District Court. Ten days later, the court dismissed the second lawsuit, since patients had been denied care at a clinic in Natrona County. The case was refiled in N…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
West Alabama Women's Center v. Miller

2:15-cv-00497 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama

Filed Date: July 10, 2015

Closed Date: Sept. 20, 2019

On July 10, 2015, the West Alabama Women’s Center, its Medical Director, and a physician it employed (collectively, the “Clinic”), sued Alabama's State Health Officer (“SHO”) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. Represented by the ACLU, the Clinic challenged an Alabama statute that required every physician who performed an abortion at a licensed abortion clinic to have staff privileges at a local hospital or, alternatively, that the clinic have a written agree…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Doe v. Minnesota

62-cv-19-3868 | Minnesota state trial court

Filed Date: May 29, 2019

Closed Date: May 30, 2024

This case concerns a challenge to a variety of Minnesota state laws concerning abortion and the treatment of sexually transmitted diseases.  On May 29, 2019 several Minnesota medical professionals as well as a religious congregation filed suit in Minnesota’s Second Judicial District against Minnesota’s Governor, Attorney General, Commissioner of Health, Board of Medical Practice and Board of Nursing. Plaintiffs were represented by the Lawyering Project and Gender Justice. In their complaint, pl…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Comprehensive Health v. Missouri

2416-CV31931 | Missouri state trial court

Filed Date: Nov. 6, 2024

This lawsuit is about a challenge to a series of abortion restrictions in Missouri.  On November 5, 2024, the people of Missouri voted to pass a constitutional amendment, known as the Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative. Amongst its provisions, the amendment legalized abortion in the state until fetal viability. The amendment was codified as Art. I, § 36.2.  The day after the amendment passed, Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains and Planned Parenthood Great Rivers-Misso…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Planned Parenthood of Arkansas and Eastern Oklahoma v. Jegley

4:15-cv-00784 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Filed Date: Dec. 28, 2015

Closed Date: Aug. 2, 2022

In 2015, Arkansas enacted the Abortion-Inducing Drugs Safety Act (“the Act”), which created new requirements for physicians providing medication abortions. Section 1504(d) of the Act set forth the contracting physician requirement. The provision required physicians providing medication abortion to have a signed contract with a physician with active admitting and gynecological/surgical privileges at a hospital. In case of an emergency, the contracting physician would handle complications. Sectio…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services v. Abbott

1:13-cv-00862 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas

Filed Date: Sept. 26, 2013

Closed Date: Dec. 10, 2014

This is a case is about a challenge to Texas House Bill 2 (“the Act”) which allegedly imposed burdensome requirements on abortion providers. On September 27, 2013, several abortion clinics and physicians filed this lawsuit on behalf of themselves and their patients in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division. The plaintiffs sued the Attorney General of Texas, the Commissioner of the Texas Department of State Health Services, the Executive Director of t…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Whole Woman's Health Alliance v. Rokita

1:18-cv-01904 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

Filed Date: June 21, 2018

Closed Date: Oct. 21, 2022

This is a case challenging Indiana laws regulating abortion. On June 21, 2018, a group of abortion providers and nonprofit organizations filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. The plaintiffs, represented by The Lawyering Project and a private firm, sued Indiana under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief and attorney's fees. They claimed Indiana’s abortion laws violated the free speech clause of the First Amendment and the due p…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
June Medical Services, LLC v. Gee

3:17-cv-00404 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

Filed Date: June 27, 2017

Closed Date: Oct. 16, 2020

This case challenged a series of 2001 Louisiana laws, including the Outpatient Abortion Facility Licensing Law (OAFLL), that attempted to shutter abortion clinics in the state by imposing more than 1,000 allegedly medically unnecessary requirements that applied only to abortion providers––including inspections of their facilities. On June 27, 2017, the Center for Reproductive Rights filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana on behalf of June Medical Serv…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Van Hollen

3:13-cv-00465 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin

Filed Date: June 28, 2013

This is a case about the constitutionality of a Wisconsin statute requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges in a hospital within 30 miles of where the abortion is performed. On July 5, 2013, Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Women's Medical Services, and two board-certified medical doctors at Planned Parenthood filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. The plaintiffs sued the Wisconsin attorney general, the Dane C…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt

1:14-cv-00284 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas

Filed Date: April 2, 2014

Closed Date: Feb. 16, 2023

This is a case challenging a 2013 Texas law requiring (1) a physician providing abortion services to obtain admitting privileges at a local hospital no farther than 30 miles from the clinic and (2) abortion clinics to meet the building specifications of ambulatory surgical centers. On April 2, 2014, a group of Texas abortion clinics and physicians filed this lawsuit on behalf of themselves and their patients in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. The plaintiffs sued the c…