Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
411 cases
Ordered by
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
DOJ Investigation of Giant Food

No Court

This is an out of court matter initiated by the United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division (DOJ). The DOJ initiated an investigation into Giant Food, a Pennsylvania-based grocery store chain with locations in various states, on December 8, 2021, following a charge of unfair documentary practices. A worker who was denied work for failing to provide a permanent resident card when demanded filed a charge with the DOJ, prompting the investigation.  Following the conclusion of the inv…
LABOR RIGHTS
McKinney v. Starbucks Corporation

2:22-cv-02292 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee

Filed Date: May 10, 2022

On May 10, 2022, M. Kathleen McKinney, the regional director of Region 15 of the National Labor Relations Board, filed a lawsuit against the Starbucks Corporation on behalf of the NLRB in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee. The petition alleged that the Starbucks Corporation engaged in acts violating Sections 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act. The lawsuit was filed in the wake of increasing tensions between the staff and management of a Memphis, Tenn…
POLICING
People of the State of California v. City of Riverside

355410 | California state trial court

Filed Date: March 5, 2001

Closed Date: March 2, 2006

In 2000, California became the first state to statutorily authorize its attorney general to address issues regarding police misconduct. On March 5, 2001, the Attorney General of California (Bill Lockyer) filed a complaint and stipulated judgment in Riverside County Superior Court. This stipulated judgment resolved issues uncovered by the Attorney General during a nearly two-year investigation of the Riverside Police Department ("RPD"). That investigation was sparked by the 1998 shooting death o…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Deluxe Financial Services

0:15-cv-02646 | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Filed Date: June 4, 2015

Closed Date: Jan. 20, 2019

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) brought this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota on behalf of a transgender woman who alleged that she had been discriminated against by her former employer under 42 U.S.C. § 1981a. The EEOC alleged violations of Title VII (42 U.S.C. § 2000e) and sought monetary and injunctive relief on behalf of the complainant. The case was assigned to Judge Ann Montgomery. The EEOC claimed that the complainant was subjected to a …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Times v. Target

1:18-cv-02993 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: April 5, 2018

On April 5, 2018, The Fortune Society, Inc., a not-for-profit whose mission is to support the successful reentry of formerly incarcerated individuals, and two former employees of the Target Corporation filed this class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs sued Target under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleging that Target utilized a job applicant screening process that systematically eliminated thousands of qualified Afric…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. BOEING COMPANY

2:05-cv-03034 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Sept. 30, 2005

Closed Date: Jan. 22, 2010

In September 30, 2005, the Phoenix District Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiff sued The Boeing Company under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, alleging that Boeing terminated and retaliated against two female employees for discriminatory reasons and on the basis of their gender. The EEOC sought to permanently enjoin Boeing from engaging in discriminatory employment pract…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Braden Sutphin Ink Company

3:04-cv-00720 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

Filed Date: Sept. 29, 2004

Closed Date: 2007

In September 2004, the EEOC district office in Richmond, Virginia brought this suit against the Braden Sutphin Ink Company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The complaint is not currently available. A consent decree was entered in May 2005. Although the consent decree is unavailable, the docket states that the defendant would expunge its employment records concerning the aggrieved party and that the terms of the agreement would run for two years.The decree was …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Harbor Freight Tools USA

2:04-cv-01505 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Filed Date: June 29, 2004

Closed Date: Oct. 31, 2007

In June 2004, the EEOC's Seattle office filed this complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington against Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., a tool and equipment catalog retailer with stores in 36 states, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, specifically that defendant engaged in sexual harassment of female employees and retaliated against one by improperly discharging her. Three individual complainants intervened in the case in August 200…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Manufacturing

1:03-cv-01160 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee

Filed Date: June 27, 2003

Closed Date: Oct. 25, 2007

EEOC's Memphis, Tennessee office filed this racial discrimination lawsuit against the defendant, Thyssenkrupp Elevator Manufacturing, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee on 06/27/2003. Thyssenkrupp manufactures, installs and repairs elevators throughout the United States. EEOC alleged on behalf of a class of Black complainants that Thyssenkrupp harassed, wrongfully discharged, failed to promote and failed to hire Black employees or job applicants bec…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. PEDIATRIC ALLIANCE

2:05-cv-00689 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: May 19, 2005

Closed Date: 2007

In May 2005, the EEOC's Philadelphia office filed this suit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania against Pediatric Alliance, P.C. alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, specifically that the defendant had discharged a female employee for objecting to a hostile work environment. The case was referred to mediation in August 2005 as well and by November 2005 the parties had agreed on a consent decree which was subsequently adopted by the c…