Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
263 cases
Ordered by
NATIONAL SECURITY
American Oversight v. Hegseth

1:25-cv-00883 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: March 25, 2025

This case challenges high-level federal officials' use of encrypted, auto-deleting messaging apps to conduct national security business, raising serious record-keeping and transparency concerns.  On March 25, 2025, American Oversight filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the Secretary of Defense, the Director of National Intelligence, the Director of the CIA, and several other senior federal figures. The plaintiffs challenged the defendants’ use of t…

Preliminary Injunction Granted

PUBLIC BENEFITS/GOVERNMENT SERVICES
California Rifle and Pistol Association, Incorporated v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department

2:23-cv-10169 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: Dec. 4, 2023

This case challenged Los Angeles County’s concealed carry weapon permit issuance policies. On December 4, 2023, individual plaintiffs and four national and state level gun rights advocacy organizations filed a suit under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 & 1988 against officials representing the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, City of La Verne Police Department, and California Attorney General in the Central District of California. The case was assigned to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Repres…

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

California Rifle and Pistol Association, Incorporated v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department

Dec. 4, 2023

Defendants City of La Verne's and Chief Flores' Notice of Joinder in Defendants Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and Sheriff Robert Luna's Response to Plaintiffs' Notice of Supplemental Authority

May 20, 2024

Order Granting in Part, Denying in Part, Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction

California Rifle and Pistol Association, Incorporated v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department

Aug. 20, 2024

Order Entering Preliminary Injunction

California Rifle and Pistol Association, Incorporated v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department

Jan. 22, 2025

Order Denying In Part And Granting In Part Defendants Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department And Sheriff Robert Luna’s Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended And Supplemental Complaint [Ecf No. 60]

California Rifle and Pistol Association, Incorporated et al. v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department et al.

July 21, 2025

see 6 additional documents

Preliminary Injunction Granted

NATIONAL SECURITY
American Oversight v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

1:25-cv-03113 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Sept. 10, 2025

On September 10, 2025, American Oversight filed suit against the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia seeking records about Corey Lewandowski’s role at the agency. Though officially designated a Special Government Employee (“SGE”), capped at 130 workdays per year, Lewandowski—former campaign manager for President Trump and now “Chief Advisor” to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem—was reported to act as her de facto chief of staff, exercising bro…

Case Is Ongoing

PRESIDENTIAL/GUBERNATORIAL AUTHORITY
City Of Chicago v. United States Department of Homeland Security

1:25-cv-05462 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: May 16, 2025

This case is about the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) alleged unlawful withholding of congressionally appropriated anti-terrorism funds from major U.S. cities, undermining local efforts to maintain public safety and preparedness. On May 16, 2025, the City of Chicago filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against DHS and its Secretary. The plaintiffs challenged the freezing of funds under the Securing the Cities counterterrorism program,…

Case Is Ongoing

NATIONAL SECURITY
In re DNI/AG 702(h) Certification 2024-A and Its Predecessor Certifications [FISC Dockets 702(j)-24-01; 702(j)-24-02; 702(j)-24-03]

702(j)-24-01 | Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

Filed Date: March 5, 2024

Closed Date: April 4, 2024

Background Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Amendments Act of 2008, 50 U.S.C. § 1881a, permits the Attorney General (AG) and the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) to conduct foreign intelligence surveillance targeting the communications of non-U.S. persons located abroad. The government need not establish probable cause that the target of electronic surveillance is a foreign power or agent of a foreign power, nor must the government specify the nature and lo…

Querying Procedures Used by the Central Intelligence Agency in Connection with Acquisitions of Foreign Intelligence Information Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as Amended

In re DNI/AG 702(h) Certification 2024-A and Its Predecessor Certifications [FISC Dockets 702(j)-24-01; 702(j)-24-02; 702(j)-24-03]]

Sept. 16, 2019

Querying Procedures Used by the National Counterterrorism Center in Connection with Acquisitions of Foreign Intelligence Information Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as Amended

In re DNI/AG 702(h) Certification 2024-A and Its Predecessor Certifications [FISC Dockets 702(j)-24-01; 702(j)-24-02; 702(j)-24-03]]

Oct. 19, 2020

Minimization Procedures Used by the National Counterterrorism Center in Connection with Acquisition of Foreign Intelligence Information Pursuant toSection 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as Amended

In re DNI/AG 702(h) Certification 2024-A and Its Predecessor Certifications [FISC Dockets 702(j)-24-01; 702(j)-24-02; 702(j)-24-03]]

Oct. 14, 2021

Minimization Procedures Used by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Connection with Acquisitions of Foreign Intelligence Information Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as Amended

In re DNI/AG 702(h) Certification 2024-A and Its Predecessor Certifications [FISC Dockets 702(j)-24-01; 702(j)-24-02; 702(j)-24-03]]

Oct. 14, 2021

Minimization Procedures Used by the Central Intelligence Agency in Connection with Acquisitions of Foreign Intelligence Information Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as Amended

In re DNI/AG 702(h) Certification 2024-A and Its Predecessor Certifications [FISC Dockets 702(j)-24-01; 702(j)-24-02; 702(j)-24-03]]

Oct. 14, 2021

see 11 additional documents
PRISON CONDITIONS
Al Shimari v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc.

1:08-cv-00827 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

Filed Date: Aug. 8, 2008

This case involves allegations of abuse and torture suffered by four Iraqi men who were detained at Abu Ghraib in 2003. On June 30, 2008, an Iraqi civilian who was imprisoned and allegedly tortured in an Iraq prison filed a civil complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio against two defense contractors—CACI (and its wholly owned subsidiary, collectively known as “CACI Defendants”) and L-3—and a named individual who allegedly worked for CACI as a screener and interro…
NATIONAL SECURITY
CLEAR v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection

1:19-cv-07079 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Filed Date: Dec. 18, 2019

Closed Date: Aug. 28, 2023

This is a FOIA case wherein plaintiffs sought records from the Customs and Border Protection pertaining to its Tactical Terrorism Response Teams (TTRTs).  On December 12, 2019, Creating Law Enforcement Accountability and Responsibility Project (“CLEAR”), the American Civil Liberties Union (“ACLU”), and the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation (“ACLUF”) sued the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Plaintiffs su…

Case Dismissed (Involuntary)

NATIONAL SECURITY
Twitter v. Barr [Holder]

4:14-cv-04480 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Oct. 7, 2014

Closed Date: Jan. 8, 2024

[Note: This case was previously known as Twitter v. Holder, then Twitter v. Lynch, then Twitter v. Sessions] On October 7, 2014, Twitter -- an online social networking service -- filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) under the Administrative Procedure Act. Twitter, represented by private counsel, asked the court for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, a…

Case Dismissed (Involuntary)

Affirmed

NATIONAL SECURITY
In re [Redacted] a U.S. Person

PR/TT 2016 | Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

Filed Date: 2016

Closed Date: 2016

For the Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse collection of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) matters, see our special collection.   On January 21, 2016, the government submitted an application to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) to install pen register and trap and trace (PR/TT) devices on a certain cell phone pursuant to FISA. Pen registers are surveillance devices that capture the phone numbers dialed on outgoing telephone calls; trap and trace devices capture th…
NATIONAL SECURITY
Wikimedia Foundation v. National Security Agency

1:15-cv-00662 | U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Filed Date: March 10, 2015

Closed Date: Feb. 21, 2023

On March 10, 2015, a collective of organizations interested in privacy, led by the Wikimedia Foundation, filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for District of Maryland. The plaintiffs sued the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Department of Justice under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq. The plaintiffs, represented by attorneys from the ACLU and private counsel, asked the court to declare “Upstream Surveillance” by the government to be unconstitutional, and …