Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
91 cases
Ordered by
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
The Family Planning Association of Maine v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

1:25-cv-00364 | U.S. District Court for the District of Maine

Filed Date: July 16, 2025

This case challenged the termination of federal Medicaid funding to the Family Planning Association of Maine (doing business as Maine Family Planning (MFP)) under the Defunding Provision of President Trump's "big, beautiful bill." The Defunding Provision, which was signed into law on July 4, 2025, barred federal Medicaid funding to American health care providers that, as of October 1, 2025, (1) are non-profit, (2) “essential community providers . . . primarily engaged in family planning service…

Preliminary Injunction Denied

Appellate Stay of Trial Court Relief Granted

HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Kahoʻohanohano v. State of Hawaiʻi

1CCV-24-0000269 | Hawaii state trial court

Filed Date: Feb. 27, 2024

This case involves a challenge to midwife licensure restrictions in Hawai’i. In 2019, Hawai’i enacted the midwifery restriction law (HRS § 457J), which imposed licensure requirements on midwives in the state. Individuals practicing midwifery without a license, or working alongside unlicensed midwives, faced criminal penalties. The law had an exemption that allowed the practice of midwifery without a license through July 2023.  On February 27, 2024, nine individuals–midwives, midwifery students,…

Preliminary Injunction Granted

HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Braid v. Stilley

1:21-cv-05283 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: Oct. 5, 2021

The Center for Reproductive Rights and private counsel filed this suit on October 5, 2021 on behalf of a physician who violated S.B. 8, the Texas law banning abortion care at approximately six weeks of pregnancy, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The suit was an interpleader action brought under the Declaratory Judgment Act and sought a declaration that S.B. 8 was unconstitutional. The case was assigned to Judge Jorge Alonso.  The interpleader action was brought …
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
MKB Management Corp v. Burdick

1:13-cv-00071 | U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota

Filed Date: June 25, 2013

Closed Date: April 15, 2016

This is a case about North Dakota’s 2013 ban on abortions as early as the sixth week of pregnancy. On June 25, 2013, the plaintiffs—including the last women’s health clinic in the state that provided abortions and a physician who performed family planning services, including abortions, for the clinic’s clients—filed this lawsuit in the District of North Dakota. The plaintiffs sued the state attorney for the county in which the clinic was located, the state attorney general, and the North Dakota…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective v. Georgia

2022CV367796 | Georgia state trial court

Filed Date: July 26, 2022

On July 26, 2022, SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Collective, Feminist Women’s Health Center, Planned Parenthood Southeast, Atlanta Comprehensive Wellness Clinic, Atlanta Women’s Medical Center, Femhealth, Summit Medical Associates, Medical Students for Choice, and three physicians filed suit against the state of Georgia in the Superior Court for Fulton County (Georgia state trial court). The plaintiffs challenged the state's Six-Week Ban on abortion and the Records Access Provision enac…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Fort Wayne Women Health v. Health Commissioner

1:10-cv-00192 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana

Filed Date: May 28, 2010

Closed Date: March 4, 2011

This case concerns a challenge to an Indiana County ordinance which imposed a special set of requirements on doctors who practiced in Fort Wayne-Allen County, but lived outside of the area and did not have privileges to admit patients at local hospitals. On May 27, 2010, Fort Wayne Women’s Health and an Indiana physician (collectively, “Women’s Health”) filed suit for declaratory and injunctive relief against the Fort Wayne-Allen County Department of Health and its Health Commissioner in Allen …

Case Dismissed (Involuntary)

HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Adkins v. State of Idaho

CV01-23-14744 | Idaho state trial court

Filed Date: Sept. 11, 2023

This suit challenged Idaho's Total Abortion Ban and Six-Week Abortion Ban as violating the rights of pregnant people and physicians protected by the Idaho Constitution. On September 11, 2023, four private plaintiffs, two doctors, and the Idaho Academy of Physicians, (collectively, “DRP”) sued the Governor of Idaho, the Attorney General of Idaho, and the Idaho State Board of Medicine (the “State Board”), (collectively, “Idaho”) in Idaho state trial court. DRP challenged both Idaho’s Total Aborti…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Reuss v. Arizona

CV2024-034624 | Arizona state trial court

Filed Date: Dec. 3, 2024

The case is about a challenge to Arizona’s 15-week abortion ban, which took effect in 2022.  In the November 5, 2024 election, Arizona voters approved Proposition 139, the Arizona Abortion Access Act. The Amendment was added to the state constitution on November 25, thereby enshrining the right to abortion in the Arizona state constitution in article II, section 8.1 (the “Abortion Amendment”). On December 3, 2024, two physicians and Planned Parenthood of Arizona, Inc., (collectively, “Planned P…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. State of South Carolina

South Carolina state supreme court

Filed Date: Sept. 14, 2023

This case concerns a statutory interpretation of South Carolina’s Fetal Heartbeat bill.  On September 14, 2023, Planned Parenthood South Atlantic and several South Carolina physicians and nurses filed suit for declaratory judgment in the South Carolina Supreme Court. Plaintiffs asked the Court to clarify the meaning of a state law banning abortions after a “fetal heartbeat” has been detected. Plaintiffs filed suit under the State’s Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act and State’s Due Process Claus…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v. Florida

2015-CA-1323 | Florida state trial court

Filed Date: June 11, 2015

This is a state court case challenging an abortion restriction in the state of Florida. According to the plaintiffs, House Bill 633 (the Mandatory Delay Law) sought to restrict women’s access to abortion services in Florida by imposing a minimum 24-hour delay between receiving state-mandated information about the nature and risks of abortion and the abortion procedure. Florida Statutes § 390.0111 required physicians to provide the information in-person (an earlier case challenging that provisio…