University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
Title "FNU Tanzin v. Tanvir"
Date Oct 6, 2020
Author Oyez
External Link https://www.oyez.org/cases/2020/19-71
Abstract The plaintiffs, Muslim men born outside of the U.S. but living lawfully inside the country, allege that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) placed their names on the national “No Fly List,” despite posing no threat to aviation, in retaliation for their refusal to become FBI informants reporting on fellow Muslims. They sued the agents in their official and individual capacities in U.S. federal court under the First Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the RFRA. They claim that the listing of their names substantially burdened their exercise of religion, in violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”), because their refusal was compelled by Muslim tenets. Under RFRA, “[a] person whose religious exercise has been burdened in violation of this section may assert that violation as a claim or defense in a judicial proceeding and obtain appropriate relief against a government.”
Source Oyez


This Resource Relates To
case Tanvir v. Holder (NS-NY-0007)

back
new search