University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
Title "National Fair Housing Alliance v. Carson - Defending Regulation Requiring Jurisdictions to Take Affirmative Steps to Promote Fair Housing"
Date August 2019
Author ACLU District of Columbia
External Link https://www.acludc.org/en/cases/national-fair-housing-alliance-v-carson-defending-regulati...
Abstract In 2015 HUD issued the “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing” Rule, which requires jurisdictions receiving federal financial aid for housing to account for fair housing issues in their regular planning processes. This means that the jurisdictions would have to actively avoid urban planning that would lead to segregation, or unfairly impact peoples’ ability to buy or rent homes due to their race, color, religion, sex, family status, disability, or national origin. Ultimately, the Rule’s goals include building affordable housing in areas well-served by transit and prohibiting landlords from discriminating against people who use a government subsidy to pay part of their rent.

But in January 2018, HUD suddenly suspended the Rule’s requirement that local governments complete assessments that follow the guidelines in the Rule. This suspension was not the result of a notice and comment rulemaking procedure, which was why in May 2018 we filed a complaint, a motion for a preliminary injunction, and a motion for summary judgment, to challenge the suspension as a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The plaintiffs are the National Fair Housing Alliance, the Texas Low Income Housing Information Service, and Texas Appleseed. The case asks the court to order HUD to rescind the suspension and to implement and enforce the requirements of the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule going forward.
Source ACLU District of Columbia


This Resource Relates To
case National Fair Housing Alliance v. Carson (FH-DC-0018)

back
new search