University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
Title "Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California"
Date Jun 18, 2020
Author Supreme Court of the United States
External Link https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-t...
Abstract Holding: The Department of Homeland Security’s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.

Judgment: Vacated in part, reversed in part and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on June 18, 2020. Roberts delivered the opinion of the court except as to Part IV. Justices Ginsburg, Breyer and Kagan joined that opinion in full, and Justice Sotomayor joined as to all but Part IV. Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in part, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, in which Justices Alito and Gorsuch joined. Justices Alito and Kavanaugh filed opinions concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part.
Source SCOTUSBlog


This Resource Relates To
case Regents of University of California v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (IM-CA-0095)

back
new search