 |
|
|
Title
|
"Non-Discrimination in Refugee and Asylum Law (against Travel Ban 1.0 and 2.0)"
|
|
Date
|
Spring 2017 |
|
Author
|
Eunice Lee |
|
Author Institution
|
Georgetown University Law School |
|
External Link
|
https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=8520020021120060980731040210851130711210460220...
|
|
Abstract
|
This article explores the tension between Executive Orders No. 13,769 and No. 13,780—colloquially known as “travel ban” 1.0 and 2.0—and the deep non-discrimination norms in refugee and asylum law. I engage in a close read of the legislative history of the Refugee Act of 1980; analyze the 1951 Refugee Convention and subsequent international human rights treaties; provide a novel and in-depth analysis of U.S. statutory, regulatory, and case law interpretations of the refugee definition via the theoretical framework of non-discrimination; and examine the structural aspects and standards governing refugee admissions. The clear picture that emerges from these sources points in a single direction—the government cannot engage in invidious discrimination against refugees or asylum seekers on the basis of religion or national origin. My analysis fills a gap in the literature as the academy and the public continue to debate the permissibility of the travel ban and its iterations. |
|
Source
|
Georgetown Immigration Law Journal |
|
Citation
|
31 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 459-524 |
|
| case | Darweesh v. Trump [voluntarily dismissed] (IM-NY-0053) |
|
|
