University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
Document Details
new document search
Document Title Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief in Support of Emergency Motions for Clarification and for Modification of October 26, 2012 Order Regarding Scope of Section III(5)(b)(vii) of the Consent Decree
Document Case Name SEIU v. Husted
Document Court Southern District of OH (U.S.)  
Document Docket(s) 2:06-cv-00896-ALM-TPK
 
Docket Entry/ECF Number 354  
State/Territory Ohio  
Document Date Nov. 8, 2012  
Clearinghouse Case ID VR-OH-0080 (View Case Detail)  
Clearinghouse Doc ID VR-OH-0080-0014  
File
Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief in Support of Emergency Motions for Clarification and for Modification of October 26, 2012 Order Regarding Scope of Section III(5)(b)(vii) of the Consent Decree
VR-OH-0080-0014.pdf
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]


People
 
Plaintiff's Lawyers Berzon, Stephen P. (California)    Detail
Chandra, Subodh (Ohio)    Detail
Chisholm, Barbara J. (California)    Detail
Gentry, Caroline (Ohio)    Detail
Harshman, Cathrine J. (Ohio)    Detail
Leonard, Danielle E. (California)    Detail
Leyton, Stacey M. (California)    Detail
McGinnis, Mark A. (Ohio)    Detail
McTigue, Donald Joseph (Ohio)    Detail
Miller, Daniel B (Ohio)    Detail
Screen, Donald P. (Ohio)    Detail
Sletvold, Ashlie Case (Ohio)    Detail
Other Lawyers Hunter, Michael J. (Ohio)    Detail

new document search

- top of page -