Filed Date: 1976
Clearinghouse coding complete
On September 27, 1973, a motorcyclist was allegedly run off the road by a squad car, strip searched, and then unlawfully imprisoned. He filed this case in state court against the city of Elgin, Illinois, and three other municipalities, and eight individual police officers for damages.
The state trial judge (John S. Petersen, J., Circuit Court, Kane County) dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, but gave no grounds. However, he stated, incorrectly, in open court that the question of police officer immunity had not been decided, and that the plaintiff should take his case to a higher court. Plaintiff appealed.
On appeal, the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second district, Second Division, (Judges Rechenmacher, Moran and Dixon) reversed and remanded. Newell v. City of Elgin, 34 Ill. App.3d 719 (Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District, Second Division, 1976). Relying on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), the court stated that the plaintiff had alleged facts which amounted to willful and wanton negligence of the police officers. The court also held that while the eight individual defendants may be subject to exemplary damages, the four municipalities named as defendants would not be, as the limit of their potential liability would be actual damages. Finally, the court instructed that in consideration of the trial judge's statements, the case be reassigned to a different judge.
We have no further information about this case.
Summary Authors
Denise Heberle (3/22/2012)
Richard Jolly (10/25/2014)
Rechenmacher, LeRoy L. (Illinois)
Rechenmacher, LeRoy L. (Illinois)
Last updated Aug. 30, 2023, 1:49 p.m.
Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.State / Territory: Illinois
Case Type(s):
Special Collection(s):
Key Dates
Filing Date: 1976
Case Ongoing: No reason to think so
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Motorcyclist who alleged that the reckless driving of Elgin police officers caused him to run off the road and resulting in physical injuries and who also alleges that he was unlawfully imprisoned and subject to unlawful search and seizure.
Plaintiff Type(s):
Public Interest Lawyer: Unknown
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Available Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Unknown
Nature of Relief:
Source of Relief:
Issues
General:
Affected Sex or Gender:
Type of Facility: