Case: EEOC v. BANCTEC SERVICE CORP

2:98-cv-05903 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: Aug. 31, 1998

Closed Date: 1999

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Philadelphia office of the EEOC brought this suit against Banctec Service Corp. in August 1998 in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. We do not have a copy of the complaint. Through a consent order, the case was transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The case was settled by entry of a consent decree. We don't have a copy of the consent decree, but it was evidently entered in April 1999.

Summary Authors

Justin Kanter (5/23/2008)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:98-cv-04102

Docket [From Original Case in New Jersey; Docket Number 98-4102]

EEOC v. Banctec Service Corp

U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey

Nov. 5, 1998

Nov. 5, 1998

Docket

2:98-cv-05903

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Banctec Service Corp

April 16, 1999

April 16, 1999

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 12, 2024, 3:01 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

Original record together with certified copy of docket entries received from U.S. District Court of New Jersey (Camden) No. 98-4102. (tj) (Entered: 11/09/1998)

Nov. 6, 1998

Nov. 6, 1998

Demand for jury trial by PLAINTIFF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPP. (tj) (Entered: 11/09/1998)

Nov. 6, 1998

Nov. 6, 1998

Letter to DON A. INNAMORATO, SUSAN C. CASSELL re: L.R. 83.5 and 83.5.2. (tj) (Entered: 11/09/1998)

Nov. 6, 1998

Nov. 6, 1998

Standard Case Management Track. (tj) (Entered: 11/09/1998)

Nov. 6, 1998

Nov. 6, 1998

2

MOTION by DEFENDANT BANCTEC SERVICE CORP FOR THE ADMISSION OF DENISE COTTER VILLANI AND JOHN G. HARRISON TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (jl) (Entered: 11/27/1998)

Nov. 25, 1998

Nov. 25, 1998

3

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR THE ADMISSION OF DENISE COTTER VILLANI, ESQUIRE AND JOHN G. HARRISON, ESQUIRE, PRO HAC VICE AND PLAINTIFF'S AGREEMENT THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT SAID MOTION IS GRANTED AND SAID ATTORNEYS ARE GRANTED LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT IN THE CASE AT BAR. (Attorney: DENISE COTTER VILLANI, JOHN G. HARRISON) (BY JUDGE CHARLES R. WEINER) 12/01/98 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED. (dt) (Entered: 12/01/1998)

Nov. 30, 1998

Nov. 30, 1998

4

Appearance of DAVID M. ROSENBLUM for PLAINTIFF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPP. (jl) (Entered: 12/29/1998)

Dec. 28, 1998

Dec. 28, 1998

Pre-trial conference SET at 9:00 2/12/99. (np) (Entered: 02/01/1999)

Feb. 1, 1999

Feb. 1, 1999

5

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41.1(b). SIGNED BY JUDGE CHARLES R. WEINER 2/16/99 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (ky) (Entered: 02/16/1999)

Feb. 12, 1999

Feb. 12, 1999

Case closed (kv) (Entered: 02/17/1999)

Feb. 12, 1999

Feb. 12, 1999

6

Stipulation and order of dismissal with prejudice by PLAINTIFF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPP, DEFENDANT BANCTEC SERVICE CORP (jl) (Entered: 04/12/1999)

April 12, 1999

April 12, 1999

7

CONSENT DECREE WITH COURT APPROVAL. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE CHARLES R. WEINER ) 4/16/99 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (gn) (Entered: 04/16/1999)

April 16, 1999

April 16, 1999

Case Details

State / Territory: Pennsylvania

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 31, 1998

Closing Date: 1999

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Banctec Service Corp., Private Entity/Person

Banctec Service Corp., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits