University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Spellman v. Humboldt County JC-CA-0030
Docket / Court 4:05-cv-00568-SBA ( N.D. Cal. )
State/Territory California
Case Type(s) Jail Conditions
Special Collection Strip Search Cases
Case Summary
On February 8, 2005, private attorney Mark E. Merin filed a class action civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, challenging the policies, practices, and customs concerning the use of strip searches and visual body ... read more >
On February 8, 2005, private attorney Mark E. Merin filed a class action civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, challenging the policies, practices, and customs concerning the use of strip searches and visual body cavity searches in the Humboldt County Jail. The named plaintiff, who was a female citizen arrested for a DWI, alleged that she was forced to strip naked, such that she was nude from the waist up in the presence of male officers not involved in her search. The search was videotaped. Plaintiff alleged that her treatment was the result of the official Humboldt County Jail policy, in which officers routinely subjected detainees in their custody to strip and visual body cavity searches before they were arraigned and without having any reasonable suspicion that the detainees possessed contraband or weapons, in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments and California state law. Plaintiff sought declaratory and injunctive relief, monetary damages and class certification.

After the parties engaged in discovery, defendants moved for summary judgment. The District Court (Saundra Brown Armstrong) found that plaintiff failed to present any evidence of similar complaints, which negated that a custom or practice of improper searches existed at the Jail. As such, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of the County of Humboldt and its Sheriff on plaintiff's municipal liability claim. Spellman v. Humboldt County, 2006 WL 1626922 (N.D.Cal. Jun 09, 2006) Plaintiff appealed.

While the case was on appeal, plaintiff refiled the case, individually naming the deputy sheriff that conducted the strip search as a defendant. That new case, which was filed on June 27, 2006, had the new case number 3:06-cv-03956-MHP and was assigned to District Judge Marilyn H. Patel.

About three months later, the parties settled the matter. They filed a joint memorandum of voluntarily dismissal dated October 16, 2006, advising the Court that the parties mutually resolved their differences. Plaintiff also voluntarily dismissed the appeal of the 2005 case. The terms of the settlement were not made part of the Court record.

Dan Dalton - 01/15/2008


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Affected Gender
Female
General
Search policies
Strip search policy
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Type of Facility
Government-run
Causes of Action 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State law
Defendant(s) Humboldt County
Humboldt County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff Description All those who were arrested from 2003-present who were subjected to a strip search at Humboldt County Jail without the defendants having a reasonable suspicion that the searches would be productive of contraband.
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer No
Nature of Relief Unknown
Source of Relief Settlement
Form of Settlement Voluntary Dismissal
Case Closing Year 2006
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Bravo v. Board of Commissioners of Dona Ana County
http://www.bazelon.org/
Date: 2017
By: The Bazelon Center (The Bazelon Center)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Jail Strip-Search Cases: Patterns and Participants
http://law.duke.edu/journals/lcp
Date: Spring 2008
By: Margo Schlanger (Washington University in St. Louis)
Citation: 71 Law & Contemp. Problems 65 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
3:06-cv-03956-MHP (N.D. Cal.)
JC-CA-0030-9001.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/24/2006
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
4:05-cv-00568-SBA (N.D. Cal.)
JC-CA-0030-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/22/2007
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Class Action Complaint
JC-CA-0030-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/08/2005
Order Granting Summary Judgment (2006 WL 1626922 / 2006 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 417) (N.D. Cal.)
JC-CA-0030-0005.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 06/09/2006
Civil Rights Complaint [ECF# 1-2]
JC-CA-0030-0002.pdf | Detail
Date: 06/27/2006
Notice of Dismissal by Plaintiff [ECF# 8] (N.D. Cal.)
JC-CA-0030-0004.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/24/2006
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [re: Motion for Reconsideration] [ECF# 75] (N.D. Cal.)
JC-CA-0030-0003.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/22/2007
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judges Armstrong, Saundra Brown (N.D. Cal.)
JC-CA-0030-0003 | JC-CA-0030-0005 | JC-CA-0030-9000
Patel, Marilyn Hall (N.D. Cal.)
JC-CA-0030-9001
Plaintiff's Lawyers Merin, Mark E. (California)
JC-CA-0030-0001 | JC-CA-0030-0002 | JC-CA-0030-0004 | JC-CA-0030-0005 | JC-CA-0030-9000 | JC-CA-0030-9001
Schwarzschild, Jeffrey I. (California)
JC-CA-0030-0001 | JC-CA-0030-0002 | JC-CA-0030-0004 | JC-CA-0030-0005 | JC-CA-0030-9000 | JC-CA-0030-9001
Defendant's Lawyers Delaney, Nancy K. (California)
JC-CA-0030-0005 | JC-CA-0030-9000

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -