Case: Leopold v. U. S. Civil Service Commission

1:71-00292 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Filed Date: March 17, 1971

Closed Date: 1978

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In March of 1971, a group of government lawyers for the INS brought suit under the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701, et seq., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, seeking to have their job pay grades reclassified from GS-12 to GS-14. The lawsuit followed administrative proceedings before the Civil Service Commission, which ultimately ruled that the jobs were properly classifiable at grade GS-13, but denied the plaintiffs' request for GS-14 rec…

In March of 1971, a group of government lawyers for the INS brought suit under the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701, et seq., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, seeking to have their job pay grades reclassified from GS-12 to GS-14. The lawsuit followed administrative proceedings before the Civil Service Commission, which ultimately ruled that the jobs were properly classifiable at grade GS-13, but denied the plaintiffs' request for GS-14 reclassification.

On July 23, 1972, the District Court (Judge Rosling) certified the case as a class action, with the class consisting of all similar attorneys employed by I.N.S. in grade GS-13. Thereafter, Judge Rosling passed away and the case was transferred to District Judge Judd, who remanded the case to the Civil Service Commission. Following remand to the Commission, the parties agreed that a study of plaintiffs' duties should be undertaken by an independent attorney. The report of that study, dated March 31, 1976 concluded that plaintiffs' jobs should have properly been classified as grade GS-14. The Commission then ordered a re-classification to grade GS-14, but it was not made retroactive. Plaintiffs then moved for summary judgment in the District Court, seeking an order that the GS-14 grade be made retroactive to 1967 and for back pay.

On April 26, 1978, the District Court (Judge J. Nickerson) held that : (1) the doctrine of sovereign immunity barred claims for back pay by the attorneys; (2) the doctrine of sovereign immunity also barred amendment of employment records so as to entitle the attorneys to increased pensions and benefits or to immediate promotions regardless of existing vacancies; and (3) the Civil Service Commission was not immune from an award to attorneys of modest relief of being eligible for promotions unprejudiced by their previous wrongful classification. Leopold v. U.S. Civil Service Commission, 450 F.Supp. 154 (E.D. NY 1978).

We have no further information on the case.

Summary Authors

Brian Ponton (8/31/2007)

People


Judge(s)

Nickerson, Eugene Hoffman (New York)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Rothstein, Martin L (New York)

Attorney for Defendant

Field, Rodger C. (New York)

Trager, David G. (New York)

Judge(s)

Nickerson, Eugene Hoffman (New York)

Attorney for Plaintiff

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:71-00292

Opinion

April 26, 1978

April 26, 1978

Order/Opinion

450 F.Supp. 450

Docket

Last updated March 20, 2024, 3:09 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: New York

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 17, 1971

Closing Date: 1978

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A group of INS lawyers seeking pay grade reclassification from GS12 to GS14.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: Unknown

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

United States Civil Service Commission, Federal

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Available Documents:

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Mixed

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Issues

General:

Public benefits (includes, e.g., in-state tuition, govt. jobs)

Immigration/Border:

Employment

Immigration lawyers