Case: Diaz v. Weinberger

1:72-cv-01312 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Filed Date: Aug. 18, 1972

Closed Date: 1976

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In 1972, a group of Cuban refugees filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, challenging the constitutionality of the eligibility requirement for aliens who wished to enroll in the Medicare Part B supplemental medical insurance program. The challenged provision, Section 1836(2)(A)(ii) of the Social Security Act of 1935, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1395o(2)(A)(ii) (1970), disqualified all aliens from Medicare Part B benefits except those who were …

In 1972, a group of Cuban refugees filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, challenging the constitutionality of the eligibility requirement for aliens who wished to enroll in the Medicare Part B supplemental medical insurance program. The challenged provision, Section 1836(2)(A)(ii) of the Social Security Act of 1935, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1395o(2)(A)(ii) (1970), disqualified all aliens from Medicare Part B benefits except those who were lawfully admitted for permanent residence and who had lived in the U.S. continuously for five years prior to applying for benefits. Plaintiffs, who were all over the age of 65 but had lawfully lived in the U.S. for less than five years, alleged that the law violated the constitutional guarantees of equal protection and due process. They sought declaratory and injunctive relief.

As Plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of a law, a Three-Judge District Court was convened to consider their claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2282, 2284 (1970). The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment.

The Three-Judge District Court (Judge James Lawrence King) held that the five-year residence requirement violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and that the alien-eligibility provisions of 42 U.S.C.S. § 1395o(2)(B) were therefore entirely unenforceable. Diaz v. Weinberger, 361 F.Supp. 1 (S.D. Fla., 1973). The government appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.

On appeal, the Supreme Court (Justice Stevens) reversed, finding that the five-year continuous residency requirement and the permanent residency requirement of the Medicare Part B program were constitutional. Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67, 96 S.Ct. 1883 (1976).

Summary Authors

Stephen Imm (8/21/2007)

People


Judge(s)

Dyer, David William (Georgia)

Eaton, Joseph Oscar (Florida)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Feinberg, Alfred (Florida)

Attorney for Defendant

Gaines, Randolph W. (Maryland)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Kaufman, Esther (District of Columbia)

Judge(s)

Dyer, David William (Georgia)

Eaton, Joseph Oscar (Florida)

King, James Lawrence (Florida)

Stevens, John Paul (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

73-cv-01312

Opinion

June 11, 1973

June 11, 1973

Order/Opinion

361 F.Supp. 361

73-01046

[Probable Jurisdiction Noted]

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 1974

May 13, 1974

Order/Opinion

416 U.S. 416

73-01046

Appellate Brief (Amicus Curiae Association Immigration and Nationality Lawyers)

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 20, 1974

Aug. 20, 1974

Pleading / Motion / Brief

1974 WL 1974

73-01046

Appellate Brief (Amicus Curiae Legal Services for the Elderly Poor)

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 1974

Oct. 3, 1974

Pleading / Motion / Brief

1974 WL 1974

73-01046

Appellate Brief (Amicus Curiae American Civil Liberties Union)

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 12, 1974

Oct. 12, 1974

Pleading / Motion / Brief

1974 WL 1974

73-01046

Appellate Brief for Amici Curiae

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 1974

Nov. 6, 1974

Pleading / Motion / Brief

1974 WL 1974

73-01046

[Restored to calendar for reargument]

Supreme Court of the United States

March 3, 1975

March 3, 1975

Order/Opinion

420 U.S. 420

73-01046

Opinion

Diaz v. Mathews

Supreme Court of the United States

June 1, 1976

June 1, 1976

Order/Opinion

426 U.S. 426

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 20, 2024, 3:08 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Florida

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 18, 1972

Closing Date: 1976

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

All persons in the United States who have been or will be denied enrollment under the Medicare Program, 42 U.S.C. § 1395 et seq. because of their failure to meet the citizenship or residency requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 1395 o(2)(A)(i) and (ii).

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Unknown

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Department of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States, Federal

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Ex Parte Young (Federal) or Bivens

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

U.S. Supreme Court merits opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Order Duration: 1976 - None

Issues

General:

Public benefits (includes, e.g., in-state tuition, govt. jobs)

Immigration/Border:

Constitutional rights

Refugees