University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Shabazz v. Norris PC-TN-0012
Docket / Court Docket No. Not Available ( W.D. Tenn. )
State/Territory Tennessee
Case Type(s) Prison Conditions
Case Summary
In September of 1981, three Muslim inmates at Fort Pillow State Farm filed this suit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee against prison officials pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, alleging that the prison official defendants had violated their First Amendment rights. ... read more >
In September of 1981, three Muslim inmates at Fort Pillow State Farm filed this suit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee against prison officials pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, alleging that the prison official defendants had violated their First Amendment rights. Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that defendants did not allow Muslim inmates to hold religious services in the absence of an outside sponsor known as a "free world sponsor" and refused to issue name badges bearing the inmates' Muslim names. In August of 1983, another action was filed alleging that defendants failed to provide constitutionally adequate substitutes for pork and on one occasion intentionally served pork to Muslim inmates in violation of their religious tenants. Plaintiffs sought injunctive and declaratory relief and damages. In 1985 these two cases were consolidated with four other actions filed by Muslim inmates in the Western District of Tennessee.

In 1985 the district court (Judge Robert McRae) granted injunctive relief requiring defendants to accommodate Muslim inmates in terms of the food served at the prison, to allow for religious services even in the absence of a "free world sponsor," and to change prison records upon request to reflect the inmates' Muslim names. The district court also denied plaintiffs' request for damages. Defendants appealed the injunctive relief issued by the district court, and one plaintiff cross-appealed the court's decision to deny money damages.

On May 31, 1991, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (per curiam opinion by Judges Keith Nelson, David A. Nelson, and John W. Peck) affirmed the lower court's denial of monetary relief but found that the scope of the court's injunction reached too broadly. Shabazz v. Norris, No. 89-6145, 89-6149, 1991 WL 90894 (6th Cir. May 31, 1991). The court held that defendants did not have to change their menu plans, because plaintiffs failed to establish any right to relief based upon their claims that their rights had been violated by the prison's food and menu practices. The court also held that defendants could require a "free world sponsor" but only if the requirement was applied in a neutral manner to all religious gatherings. Finally, the court stated that the district court did not order defendants to change prison records to reflect inmates' Muslim names, but only observed that it would be proper and appropriate to do so; therefore, the court found there was no issue to appeal concerning the recognition of Muslim names.

We don't have any further information about these cases, which presumably are long-since over.

Emilee Baker - 05/17/2006


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Affected Gender
Male
General
Food service / nutrition / hydration
Religious programs / policies
Type of Facility
Government-run
Causes of Action 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Defendant(s) Fort Pillow State Farm
Plaintiff Description Three Muslim inmates at the Fort Pillow State Farm prison alleging that the defendants violated their First Amendment rights.
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Mixed
Public Int. Lawyer Unknown
Nature of Relief Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Litigation
Order Duration 1991 - n/a
Case Ongoing No reason to think so
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Cruel Confinement: Abuse, Discrimination and Death Within Alabama's Prisons
Date: Jun. 4, 2014
(Southern Poverty Law Center )
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Civil Rights Injunctions Over Time: A Case Study of Jail and Prison Court Orders
N.Y.U. Law Review
Date: May 2006
By: Margo Schlanger (Washington University)
Citation: 81 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 550 (2006)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America's Prisons
Date: Jan. 1, 1998
By: Malcolm M. Feeley & Edward Rubin (UC Berkeley Boalt Hall School of Law & Vanderbilt School of Law Faculty)
Citation: (1998)
[ Detail ]

Docket(s)
No docket sheet currently in the collection
General Documents
Unpublished Opinion (934 F.2d 322)
PC-TN-0012-0001.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 05/31/1991
Judges Keith, Damon Jerome (E.D. Mich., Sixth Circuit)
PC-TN-0012-0001
Nelson, David Aldrich (Sixth Circuit)
PC-TN-0012-0001
Peck, John Weld II (S.D. Ohio, Sixth Circuit)
PC-TN-0012-0001

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -