Case: Chavez-Rivas v. Olsen

1:01-cv-01018 | U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey

Filed Date: March 2, 2001

Closed Date: 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On March 2, 2001, the petitioner, Valentin Chavez-Rivas, a Cuban refugee, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the District Court for the District of New Jersey. The petitioner was being held by the INS under a final deportation order because of multiple criminal convictions. Petitioner asserted that his continued detention was unlawful because Cuba would not consent to his return. After the case was filed, Petitioner was transferred from FCI Fairton i…

On March 2, 2001, the petitioner, Valentin Chavez-Rivas, a Cuban refugee, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the District Court for the District of New Jersey. The petitioner was being held by the INS under a final deportation order because of multiple criminal convictions. Petitioner asserted that his continued detention was unlawful because Cuba would not consent to his return.

After the case was filed, Petitioner was transferred from FCI Fairton in Jew Jersey to the Federal Correctional Institution at Memphis, Tennessee. The government moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, or alternatively, to transfer the case to the District of Tennessee. The District Court (Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky) denied the government's motion. Chavez-Rivas v. Olsen, 194 F.Supp.2d 368, 2 (D.N.J. 2002). The Court directed the parties to brief several issues critical to the case, including: whether the Cuban Review Plan, under which Petitioner was being held, was constitutional and whether the INS review panels had violated due the Due Process Clause by relying on Petitioner's arrests alone, rather than evidence of criminal conduct, in assessing his future dangerousness.

After the parties briefed the issues, the Court (Judge Orlofsky) issued its order. Judge Orlofsky found that the INS could lawfully detain Cubans indefinitely under the Cuban Review Plan. However, in Petitioner's case, he was not afforded proper due process in that the INS relied on evidence of his arrests, without any evidence that the crimes were actually committed. The Court ordered that the INS conduct a new parole hearing consistent with the Court's order. Chavez-Rivas v. Olsen, 207 F.Supp.2d 326, 13 (D.N.J. 2002). The government appealed but subsequently dismissed its appeal.

We have no further information on the case.

Summary Authors

Brian Ponton (7/22/2007)

People


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Coughlin, Richard (New Jersey)

Attorney for Defendant

Ashcroft, John (District of Columbia)

Bizzarri, Louis J (New Jersey)

Christie, Christopher James (New Jersey)

Flynn, Steven J. (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:01-cv-01018

Docket (PACER)

Dec. 31, 2002

Dec. 31, 2002

Docket
11

1:01-cv-01018

Opinion

April 1, 2002

April 1, 2002

Order/Opinion

194 F.Supp.2d 194

18

1:01-cv-01018

Opinion

July 8, 2002

July 8, 2002

Order/Opinion

207 F.Supp.2d 207

Docket

Last updated March 25, 2024, 3:05 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link

Petition Received. (femp) (Entered: 03/01/2001)

March 1, 2001

March 1, 2001

1

PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed with application to proceed in forma pauperis (femp) (Entered: 03/06/2001)

March 2, 2001

March 2, 2001

2

ORDER, to proceed in forma pauperis ( signed by Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky ) (femp) (Entered: 03/06/2001)

March 2, 2001

March 2, 2001

2

ORDER, directing respondents to answer in 45 days set answer due for 4/20/01 for INS DIRECTOR, for JOHN ASHCROFT, for KEITH OLSON ( signed by Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky ) (femp) (Entered: 03/06/2001)

March 2, 2001

March 2, 2001

3

NOTICE of Allocation and Assignment filed. (femp) (Entered: 03/06/2001)

March 6, 2001

March 6, 2001

4

ANSWER to petition for Writ of habeas corpus by KEITH OLSON, JOHN ASHCROFT, INS DIRECTOR. (Request for Release) (ar1) (Entered: 04/16/2001)

April 16, 2001

April 16, 2001

5

TRAVERSE by Valentin Chavez Rivas; Re: [4-1] writ answer. (ar1) (Entered: 05/17/2001)

May 14, 2001

May 14, 2001

6

ORDER appointing Richard Coughlin, Federal Public Defender for petitioner Valentin Chavez Rivas. (signed by Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky) (NM) (ar1) (Entered: 08/09/2001)

Aug. 7, 2001

Aug. 7, 2001

7

LETTER By VALENTIN CHAVEZ RIVAS; Re: Change of Address. (ar1) (Entered: 08/28/2001)

Aug. 27, 2001

Aug. 27, 2001

8

LETTER By VALENTIN CHAVEZ RIVAS; Re: Change of Address. (ar1) (Entered: 09/04/2001)

Aug. 31, 2001

Aug. 31, 2001

9

Notice of MOTION to dismiss, or in the alternative to transfer this action to the Western District of Tennessee by respondent KEITH OLSON, Motion set for 10/19/01 on [9-1] motion . (Brief/PO Subm) (ar1) (Entered: 09/07/2001)

Sept. 7, 2001

Sept. 7, 2001

10

LETTER By VALENTIN CHAVEZ RIVAS addressed to Judge Orlofsky; Re: Transferred to Memphis, etc. (ar1) (Entered: 01/11/2002)

Jan. 11, 2002

Jan. 11, 2002

11

OPINION FILED. ( signed by Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky ) (NM) (ar1) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

April 1, 2002

April 1, 2002

12

ORDER denying [9-1] motion to dismiss, or in the alternative to transfer this action to the Western District of Tennessee; directing the parties to file supplemental briefs within 20 days. ( signed by Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky ) (NM) (ar1) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

April 1, 2002

April 1, 2002

13

ORDER that the dates for supplemental briefs are continued from April 22, 2002 to April 26, 2002. ( signed by Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky ) (NM) (ar1) (Entered: 04/15/2002)

April 15, 2002

April 15, 2002

14

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by KEITH OLSON, JOHN ASHCROFT, INS DIRECTOR Service Re: [9-1] supplemental brief in opposition to motion to dismiss, or in the alternative to transfer this action to the Western District of Tennessee (er) (Entered: 04/22/2002)

April 19, 2002

April 19, 2002

Supplemental Memorandum by petitioner in support of petition for writ of habeas corpus sent to chambers. (ar1) (Entered: 04/24/2002)

April 24, 2002

April 24, 2002

15

RESPONSE by KEITH OLSON, JOHN ASHCROFT, INS DIRECTOR in reply of their [9-1] motion to dismiss and in oppostion to a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. (ar1) (Entered: 05/02/2002)

May 2, 2002

May 2, 2002

16

Minute entry: Proceedings recorded by Ct-Reporter: Ted Formaroli; Minutes of: 5/17/02; The following actions were taken, Hearing on petition for habeas corpus. Ordered decision reserved. By Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky (ar1) (Entered: 05/20/2002)

May 17, 2002

May 17, 2002

17

TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings taken on May 17, 2002. (ar1) (Entered: 06/10/2002)

June 10, 2002

June 10, 2002

18

OPINION ( signed by Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky ) (ar1) (Entered: 07/09/2002)

July 8, 2002

July 8, 2002

19

ORDER granting and denying in part petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. ( signed by Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky ) (NM) (ar1) (Entered: 07/09/2002)

July 8, 2002

July 8, 2002

Case closed (ar1) (Entered: 07/09/2002)

July 9, 2002

July 9, 2002

20

NOTICE OF APPEAL filed at 10:36 by KEITH OLSON, JOHN ASHCROFT, INS DIRECTOR Re: [19-1] order . Fee Status: NOT PAID. Copies of notice of appeal sent to USCA and Attorney(s): LOUIS J. BIZZARRI, RICHARD COUGHLIN (lc) (Entered: 09/05/2002)

Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

21

NOTICE of Docketing ROA from USCA Re: [20-1] appeal USCA NUMBER: 02-3460 (lc) (Entered: 09/17/2002)

Sept. 13, 2002

Sept. 13, 2002

22

Transcript Purchase Order RE: [20-1] appeal (None Requested - Unnecessary for appeal purposes) (lc) (Entered: 11/15/2002)

Nov. 15, 2002

Nov. 15, 2002

23

Certified Copy Of Order from the USCA. Re: Dismissing Appeal purs. to Rule 42(b),Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure without cost to either party. (lc) (Entered: 12/31/2002)

Dec. 31, 2002

Dec. 31, 2002

Case Details

State / Territory: New Jersey

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 2, 2001

Closing Date: 2002

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A Mariel Cuban illegal alien

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Office of the Attorney General (Washington), Federal

The Federal Bureau of Prisons (Fairton), Federal

Immigration and Naturalization Service, Federal

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Habeas Corpus, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241-2253; 2254; 2255

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Mixed

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Order Duration: 2002 - 0

Issues

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Habeas Corpus

Immigration/Border:

Constitutional rights

Cuban/Haitian entrant

Deportation - procedure

Detention - criteria

Detention - procedures

Refugees

Undocumented immigrants - rights and duties