University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Cody v. Hillard PC-SD-0001
Docket / Court 80-4039 ( D.S.D. )
State/Territory South Dakota
Case Type(s) Prison Conditions
Attorney Organization ACLU National (all projects)
ACLU National Prison Project
Case Summary
On March 7, 1980, inmates of the South Dakota State Penitentiary in Sioux Falls, South Dakota filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against the South Dakota Department of Corrections. The plaintiffs, represented by the ... read more >
On March 7, 1980, inmates of the South Dakota State Penitentiary in Sioux Falls, South Dakota filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against the South Dakota Department of Corrections. The plaintiffs, represented by the National Prison Project of the American Civil Liberties Union and by East River Legal Services, asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that their constitutional rights had been violated by the conditions of their confinement. Specifically, they complained of fire hazards, unsanitary food, work safety hazards, poor ventilation, inadequate plumbing, inadequate medical care, inadequate dental care, inadequate psychological care, overcrowding, lack of hot water, lack of heat in winter, inadequate law library, lack of recreation and exercise, and inadequate grievance procedures.

On May 31, 1984, the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota (Judge Donald J. Porter) granted declaratory and injunctive relief to the plaintiffs, ordering the defendants stop double-celling inmates and to file a plan to fix the other problems within 120 days. Cody v. Hilliard, 599 F.Supp. 1025 (D.S.D. 1984). The defendants appealed. On October 28, 1986, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (Judge Gerald W. Heaney) affirmed the district court's decision. Cody v. Hilliard, 799 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1986).

The defendants asked the Eighth Circuit for a rehearing en banc, and on October 28, 1986, the Eighth Circuit agreed to rehear the case. Cody v. Hilliard, 804 F.2d 440 (8th Cir. 1986). On October 6, 1987, the en banc Eighth Circuit (Judge Pasco Middleton Bowman II) reversed the district court's order forbidding double-celling, declaring that the practice was not unconstitutional, but affirmed all other orders of the district court. Cody v. Hilliard, 830 F.2d 912 (8th Cir. 1987). The plaintiffs appealed. On February 29, 1988, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal. Cody v. Hilliard, 485 U.S. 906 (1988).

On July 8, 1985, the district court (Judge Porter) issued a consent decree in the case, addressing issues such as prison environmental concerns, fire safety, medical care, psychological care, prisoners' access to courts, and food preparation and sanitation. In the years that followed, the defendants paid attorneys' fees to the plaintiffs on multiple occasions, never disputing the plaintiffs' entitlement to fees.

On April 16, 1996, the defendants asked the district court to terminate the consent decree, arguing that they were in substantial compliance. On March 13, 1997, the district court (Judge Richard H. Battey) dissolved the consent decree and vacated all supplemental orders. The plaintiffs appealed. On March 27, 1998, the Eighth Circuit (Judge John R. Gibson) reversed the decision to dissolve the decree and remanded the case back to the district court, holding that the dissolution of the decree was not supported by sufficient findings or an articulation of basis for the decision. Cody v. Hilliard, 139 F.3d 1197 (8th Cir. 1998).

On February 17, 2000, the district court (Judge Lawrence L. Piersol) approved a settlement agreement between the parties and dismissed the case without prejudice. Cody v. Hilliard, 88 F.Supp.2d 1049 (D.S.D. 2000). We have no information on the terms of this settlement agreement.

The plaintiffs asked the district court to award them attorneys' fees. On November 15, 2000, the district court (Judge Piersol) awarded $106,877.74 in attorneys' fees to the plaintiffs. The defendants appealed. On September 11, 2002, the Eighth Circuit (Judge Gibson) affirmed the fee award. Cody v. Hilliard, 304 F.3d 767 (8th Cir. 2002).

Kristen Sagar - 07/12/2006
Maurice Youkanna - 07/20/2014

compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Affected Gender
Constitutional Clause
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Due Process
Equal Protection
Content of Injunction
Discrimination Prohibition
Crowding / caseload
Sex discrimination
Access to lawyers or judicial system
Conditions of confinement
Fire safety
Food service / nutrition / hydration
Grievance Procedures
Law library access
Recreation / Exercise
Sanitation / living conditions
Staff (number, training, qualifications, wages)
Unconstitutional conditions of confinement
Medical/Mental Health
Dental care
Medical care, general
Mental health care, general
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Type of Facility
Causes of Action Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Defendant(s) State of South Dakota
Plaintiff Description Prisoners housed within the general population of the South Dakota State Penitentiary at Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Indexed Lawyer Organizations ACLU National (all projects)
ACLU National Prison Project
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status granted Yes
Filed Pro Se No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Attorneys fees
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Litigation
Form of Settlement Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration 1985 - 2000
Filing Year 1980
Case Closing Year 2002
Case Ongoing Yes
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Civil Rights Injunctions Over Time: A Case Study of Jail and Prison Court Orders
N.Y.U. Law Review
Date: May 2006
By: Margo Schlanger (Washington University Faculty)
Citation: 81 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 550 (2006)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America's Prisons
Date: Jan. 1, 1998
By: Malcolm M. Feeley & Edward Rubin (UC Berkeley Boalt Hall School of Law & Vanderbilt School of Law Faculty Faculty)
Citation: (1998)
[ Detail ]

80-4039 (D.S.D.)
PC-SD-0001-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/09/2002
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Second Amended Complaint
PC-SD-0001-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 06/01/1982
Memorandum Opinion (599 F.Supp. 1025) (D.S.D.)
PC-SD-0001-0020.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 05/31/1984
Source: Google Scholar
USCA Opinion (1984 U.S.App.LEXIS 20148)
PC-SD-0001-0028.pdf | LEXIS | Detail
Date: 07/26/1984
Source: LexisNexis
Plaintiffs' Proposed Remedial Order
PC-SD-0001-0002.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/24/1985
Plaintiffs response to Defendants' Proposed Plan for Compliance
PC-SD-0001-0004.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/24/1985
Proposed Final Order (D.S.D.)
PC-SD-0001-0005.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/30/1985
Final Order (D.S.D.)
PC-SD-0001-0006.pdf | Detail
Date: 07/08/1985
Reported Opinion (799 F.2d 447)
PC-SD-0001-0021.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 09/02/1986
Source: Google Scholar
Order (804 F.2d 440)
PC-SD-0001-0026.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 10/28/1986
Source: Westlaw
Reported Opinion (830 F.2d 912)
PC-SD-0001-0022.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 10/06/1987
Source: Google Scholar
Order (D.S.D.)
PC-SD-0001-0010.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/26/1987
Order (D.S.D.)
PC-SD-0001-0011.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/04/1987
Defendants' Report on Legal Access
PC-SD-0001-0012.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/06/1988
Report of the Expert Panel regarding physical plant
PC-SD-0001-0013.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/13/1988
Reported Opinion (485 U.S. 906)
PC-SD-0001-0027.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 02/29/1988
Source: Westlaw
Medical Panel Report
PC-SD-0001-0015.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/19/1988
Order to Dissolve Consent Decree (D.S.D.)
PC-SD-0001-0016.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/13/1997
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota
PC-SD-0001-0017.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/27/1998
Opinion (139 F.3d 1197)
PC-SD-0001-0023.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 03/27/1998
Source: Google Scholar
Memorandum Opinion and Order (88 F.Supp.2d 1049) (D.S.D.)
PC-SD-0001-0024.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 02/17/2000
Source: Google Scholar
Opinion (304 F.3d 767)
PC-SD-0001-0025.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 09/11/2002
Source: Google Scholar
Judges Battey, Richard Howard (D.S.D.)
Bowman, Pasco Middleton II (Eighth Circuit)
Gibson, John R. (W.D. Mo., Eighth Circuit)
PC-SD-0001-0017 | PC-SD-0001-0023 | PC-SD-0001-0025
Heaney, Gerald William (Eighth Circuit)
Piersol, Lawrence L. (D.S.D.)
PC-SD-0001-0024 | PC-SD-0001-9000
Porter, Donald James (D.S.D.)
PC-SD-0001-0006 | PC-SD-0001-0010 | PC-SD-0001-0011 | PC-SD-0001-0013 | PC-SD-0001-0015 | PC-SD-0001-0020
Plaintiff's Lawyers Alexander, Elizabeth R. (District of Columbia)
PC-SD-0001-0001 | PC-SD-0001-0002 | PC-SD-0001-0004 | PC-SD-0001-0010 | PC-SD-0001-0013 | PC-SD-0001-0020 | PC-SD-0001-0021 | PC-SD-0001-0022 | PC-SD-0001-0023 | PC-SD-0001-0024 | PC-SD-0001-0025 | PC-SD-0001-9000
Clayton, Thomas W. (South Dakota)
PC-SD-0001-0024 | PC-SD-0001-0025 | PC-SD-0001-9000
Cummings, Douglas P. Jr. (South Dakota)
PC-SD-0001-0001 | PC-SD-0001-0002 | PC-SD-0001-0004 | PC-SD-0001-0020 | PC-SD-0001-0024 | PC-SD-0001-9000
Froke, Bill (South Dakota)
PC-SD-0001-0001 | PC-SD-0001-0002 | PC-SD-0001-0004 | PC-SD-0001-0020
Lee, Donna Hae Kyun (District of Columbia)
PC-SD-0001-0023 | PC-SD-0001-0024 | PC-SD-0001-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Barnett, Mark W. (South Dakota)
PC-SD-0001-0020 | PC-SD-0001-0023
Dale, Richard (South Dakota)
PC-SD-0001-0020 | PC-SD-0001-0021 | PC-SD-0001-0022
Geaghan, Frank (South Dakota)
PC-SD-0001-0023 | PC-SD-0001-9000
Love, Todd Alan (South Dakota)
Mayer, Robert E. (South Dakota)
Meierhenry, Mark V. (South Dakota)
Moore, James Ellis (South Dakota)
PC-SD-0001-0024 | PC-SD-0001-0025 | PC-SD-0001-9000
Smith, Mark (South Dakota)
PC-SD-0001-0012 | PC-SD-0001-0015 | PC-SD-0001-9000
Tellinghuisen, Roger A (South Dakota)

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -