On July 23, 1987, inmates filed a class action lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, challenging the constitutionality of the conditions of confinement at the State Correctional Institution at Pittsburgh ("SCIP") located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (also referred to as the "Western Penitentiary"). SCIP was a maximum security walled prison that was built in 1882. The Complaint was amended on December 14, 1987 and sought declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as class certification. Plaintiffs were represented by attorneys of the National Prison Project of the ACLU and the Neighborhood Legal Services Association.
On May 3, 1989, the District Court (Chief Judge Maurice B. Cohill, Jr.) conducted an unannounced four-hour tour of the SCIP facility. A six week bench trial began the next day and lasted from May 4 to June 8, 1989. Evidence presented at trial included the testimony of 42 witnesses and over 600 documents.
Following the trial, the District Court entered a very detailed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Opinion. Tillery v. Owens, 719 F.Supp. 1256 (W.D.Pa. 1989). Judge Cohill found that nearly every aspect of SCIP that was considered fell way below constitutional standards. The conditions were so severe, that he noted "we might very well order that SCIP be closed immediately; it is an overcrowded, unsanitary, and understaffed fire trap." Specifically, the Court held that defendants had failed to provide constitutionally adequate security, fire protection, sanitation, access to the courts, medical care, mental health care, and dental services. The Court also held that the SCIP was unconstitutionally overcrowded and ordered the elimination of double-celling. The defendants were ordered to submit remediation plans to correct the various deficiencies. In accordance with the Court's order, Lynette Norton was appointed Prison Monitor to oversee compliance by the Defendants. Defendants appealed. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals (Circuit Judge Sloviter) affirmed. Tillery v. Owens, 907 F.2d 418 (3rd Cir. 1990). The remediation phase followed.
As part of its remediation efforts, the SCIP submitted a plan to the Court for upgrades to the SCIP law libraries. The plan submitted proposing the establishment of mini law libraries in administrative segregation units of the SCIP (the RHU and Clinic)to contain the same publications approved for the class of death-sentenced inmates at Pittsburgh in Peterkin v. Jeffes, 1989 WL 140489 (E.D. Pa. November 14, 1989). [See PC-PA-0024 of this collection]. The District Court rejected the plan and by its Order dated July 21, 1992, ordered the Commonwealth officials to purchase additional volumes for the mini law libraries, other than those ordered in Peterkin v. Jeffes. Defendants appealed that order. The Third Circuit affirmed. Tillery v. Owens, 993 F.2d 879 (3rd. Cir. Table 1993).
Remediation continued from 1993 to 1997, during which time the parties filed motions regarding implementation of plans to correct various conditions at the SCIP. According to the PACER docket, the Prison Monitor filed a total of seven reports with the Court. Following the last Monitor report of September 19, 1997, the District Court (Judge Maurice B. Cohill Jr.) denied all pending motions and ordered the case closed. Class member Kenneth Davenport appealed pro se. The Third Circuit dismissed his appeal for lack of legal merit.
No further case activity was noted on the PACER docket.Dan Dalton - 03/13/2007