EEOC v. UNITED GOVERNMENT SERVICES | Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

Case Profile		new search page permalink

Case Name	EEOC v. UNITED GOVERNMENT SERVICES	EE-MI-0170
Docket / Court	01-40211 ( E.D. Mich. )
State/Territory	Michigan
Case Type(s)	Equal Employment
Special Collection	EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization	EEOC
Case Summary	The EEOC's Detroit office filed this suit on July 31, 2001 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Flint Division. The EEOC alleged that defendant United Government Services failed to hire the complainants to auditor positions because of their age in violation of the Age ... read more > The EEOC's Detroit office filed this suit on July 31, 2001 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Flint Division. The EEOC alleged that defendant United Government Services failed to hire the complainants to auditor positions because of their age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). The case eventually settled by consent decree which was entered into the record August 28, 2002. The defendant agreed to pay the complainants $38,500. One complainant received $30,000 while the other received $8,500. The defendant also agreed to provide training for employees at its Detroit, Michigan facility, post notice of EEO rights and refrain from violating the ADEA. Jason Chester - 08/23/2007 compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -

Issues and Causes of Action

Issues

Content of Injunction

Discrimination Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Retaliation Prohibition

Discrimination-area

Hiring

Discrimination-basis

Age discrimination

EEOC-centric

Direct Suit on Merits

General

Disparate Treatment

Plaintiff Type

EEOC Plaintiff

Causes of Action

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Case Details


Defendant(s)	United Government Services, Inc.
Plaintiff Description	Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations	EEOC
Class action status sought	No
Class action status granted	No
Prevailing Party	Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer	Yes
Nature of Relief	Damages Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief	Settlement
Form of Settlement	Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration	2002 - 2004
Case Closing Year	2002
Case Ongoing	No

Additional Resources


	Microsoft Gender Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit Date: Oct. 14, 2016 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Age Discrimination Class Action seeks Fair Employment for Older PwC Applicants http://www.pwcagecase.com/ Date: Apr. 27, 2016 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Smith Barney Gender Discrimination https://www.lieffcabraser.com/employment/smith-barney/ Date: August 2008 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform Date: Mar. 1, 2008 By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law Faculty) Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach Date: Apr. 1, 2001 By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School Faculty) Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Documents

Docket(s)

4:01-cv-40211-PVG (E.D. Mich.)
EE-MI-0170-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 09/03/2002
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]

General Documents

Consent Decree [ECF# 10]

EE-MI-0170-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 08/28/2002
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]

People