Case: Hill v. Anderson

6:73-00087 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma

Filed Date: April 5, 1973

Closed Date: 1974

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In 1973, a black inmate in the Oklahoma State Penitentiary filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Oklahoma Department of Corrections in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. The plaintiff, representing himself, asked the court for money damages, injunctive relief and that he be transferred to a different institution, alleging that defendants, acting under color of law, deprived him of certain of his civil rights in connection with his confinement. Specifica…

In 1973, a black inmate in the Oklahoma State Penitentiary filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Oklahoma Department of Corrections in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. The plaintiff, representing himself, asked the court for money damages, injunctive relief and that he be transferred to a different institution, alleging that defendants, acting under color of law, deprived him of certain of his civil rights in connection with his confinement. Specifically, the plaintiff contended that defendants practiced racial discrimination against him with reference to housing and job assignment, and that he was abused, taunted, subjected to tear gas, placed in maximum segregation without charges being made against him, and denied access to the Courts.

Previously, on October 20, 1972, the Oklahoma Department of Corrections issued a directive that all facilities at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary be integrated and prohibiting racial segregation.

On March 5, 1974, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma (Judge Frederick A. Daugherty) dismissed the plaintiff's claims. Hill v. Anderson, 381 F. Supp. 906 (E.D. Okla. 1974). With respect to the plaintiff's housing assignment, Judge Daugherty found that the defendants, having substantially integrated the Penitentiary, did not act arbitrarily or capriciously when denying plaintiff's transfer request, did not violate the plaintiff's civil rights as he claims, and that the "Plaintiff [was] not entitled to a specific cell or cellhouse by making a request therefore." With respect to plaintiff's job assignment, Judge Daugherty found that "Plaintiff [was] not entitled to a job assignment of his choice in the prison," and further that the plaintiff presented no evidence as to who declined his request for the desired jobs or why he was not favorably considered. Judge Daugherty held that "it is an essential element of a Civil Rights claim that the particular defendant be personally involved in the alleged denial of the Constitutional Right." Judge Daugherty dismissed the plaintiff's claims of abuse, taunting and subjection to tear gas as having been abandoned for want of evidence. And Judge Daugherty dismissed the plaintiff's claim of being placed in maximum segregation without a charge and being denied access to the Courts as having been refuted by the evidence.

Summary Authors

Kristen Sagar (8/20/2007)

People


Judge(s)

Daugherty, Frederick Alvin (Oklahoma)

Attorney for Defendant

Kennedy, Kay Karen (Oklahoma)

Judge(s)

Daugherty, Frederick Alvin (Oklahoma)

Attorney for Defendant

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

6:73-00087

Memorandum Opinion

March 5, 1974

March 5, 1974

Order/Opinion

Docket

Last updated Feb. 15, 2024, 3:15 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Oklahoma

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 5, 1973

Closing Date: 1974

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Black inmate in the Oklahoma State Penitentiary complaining that, acting under color of state law, prison officials deprived him of his civil rights in connection with his confinement as a prisoner

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Unknown

Filed Pro Se: Unknown

Class Action Sought: Unknown

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

Oklahoma Department of Corrections, State

Oklahoma State Penitentiary (McAlester), State

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Establishment Clause

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Order Duration: 1972 - 0

Issues

General:

Racial segregation

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Disciplinary segregation

Law library access

Discrimination-basis:

Race discrimination

Type of Facility:

Government-run