Case: EEOC v. EXIDE CORPORATION

2:01-cv-02287 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: May 10, 2001

Closed Date: Sept. 5, 2003

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In May 2001, the Philadelphia District Office of the EEOC filed this complaint against Exide Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. The charging party intervened in this lawsuit in October 2001. Following the defendant' declaration of bankruptcy and reformation as a new corporation in April-June 2002, and an administrative closure of the case in July 2002, the parties settled the lawsuit in September 2003 through a consent decree. We do not have a copy of the Decree; therefore, the exact terms of the agreement are unknown.

Summary Authors

Daisy Manning (10/25/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:01-cv-02287

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Exide Corporation, et al

Sept. 5, 2003

Sept. 5, 2003

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated Feb. 27, 2024, 3 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

Complaint. (ss) (Entered: 05/10/2001)

May 10, 2001

May 10, 2001

Summons(es) issued, One original Forwarded to: counsel 5/10/01 (ss) (Entered: 05/10/2001)

May 10, 2001

May 10, 2001

Demand for jury trial by PLAINTIFF EEOC (ss) (Entered: 05/10/2001)

May 10, 2001

May 10, 2001

2

MOTION by DEFENDANT EXIDE CORPORATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER, PLEAD OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT , MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (jl) (Entered: 06/14/2001)

June 13, 2001

June 13, 2001

3

Affidavit of: RICHARD SAUPPE re: served summons and complaint upon DEFENDANT EXIDE CORPORATION . Served by: PERSONAL SERVICE on 6/1/01 (service accepted by James Sweeney). (jl) (Entered: 06/19/2001)

June 19, 2001

June 19, 2001

4

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER, PLEAD OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT IS GRANTED, DEFENDANT MAY HAVE AN EXTENSION OF TIME, THROUGH AND INCLUDING 7/11/01, TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ) 6/20/01 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (jl) (Entered: 06/20/2001)

June 20, 2001

June 20, 2001

5

MOTION by DEFENDANT EXIDE CORPORATION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT OF PLANITFF'S CLAIMS , MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (afm) (Entered: 07/12/2001)

July 11, 2001

July 11, 2001

6

Memorandum by PLAINTIFF EEOC in opposition to DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT OF PLANITFF'S CLAIMS , Certificate of Service, Memorandum, Affidavit. (jl) (Entered: 07/24/2001)

July 24, 2001

July 24, 2001

Pretrial Scheduling conference SET at 4:15 9/26/01. (afm) (Entered: 08/09/2001)

Aug. 8, 2001

Aug. 8, 2001

7

MOTION by DEFENDANT EXIDE CORPORATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY MEMORANDUM , CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (REPLY BRIEF ATTACHED). (rv) (Entered: 08/10/2001)

Aug. 9, 2001

Aug. 9, 2001

8

Notice on behalf of DEFENDANT EXIDE CORPORATION to withdraw the appearance of DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP as counsel of record for Defendant EXIDE CORPORATION and enter the appearance of MICHAEL G. TIERCE, ESQUIRE and JONATHAN NADLER, ESQUIRE of SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP AS counsel of record for DEFENDANT EXIDE CORPORATION in the matter above. (jl) (Entered: 09/05/2001)

Sept. 5, 2001

Sept. 5, 2001

9

ORDER THAT THE CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 9/26/01 AT 4:15 IS CANCELED AND RESCHEDULED FOR 10/2/01 AT 2:00; ETC. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ) 9/19/01 ENTERED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS ON 9/17/01. (jl) (Entered: 09/19/2001)

Sept. 18, 2001

Sept. 18, 2001

10

MOTION TO INTERVENE BY MOVANT ROBIN PRATT , CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (complaint attached). (jl) (Entered: 09/26/2001)

Sept. 26, 2001

Sept. 26, 2001

11

Minute entry: 10/2/01, Scheduling Conference. The Defendant's motion for a more definite statement of the plaintiff's claims is withdrawn. The movant Robin Pratt's motion to intervene is granted. (jl) (Entered: 10/03/2001)

Oct. 2, 2001

Oct. 2, 2001

12

ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT OF THE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS IS WITHDRAWN AND THE MOVANT ROBIN PRATT'S MOTION TO INTERVENE IS GRANTED AS STATED ON THE RECORD OF 10/2/01 ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ) 10/9/01 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS. (jl) (Entered: 10/09/2001)

Oct. 9, 2001

Oct. 9, 2001

13

SCHEDULING ORDER THAT THE PARTIES SHALL SCHEDULE A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ON 3/22/02; ALL FACT DISCOVERY SHALL BE COMPLETED BY 4/5/02 ; PLAINTIFF'S PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM DUE 5/14/02 ; DEFENDANT'S PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM 5/21/02 ; ALL DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SHALL BE FILED NO LATER THAN 4/25/02; THIS CASE WILL BE PLACED IN THE TRIAL POOL ON 5/28/02; ETC. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ) 10/9/01 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS. (jl) (Entered: 10/09/2001)

Oct. 9, 2001

Oct. 9, 2001

14

ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED FROM THE CALENDAR OF JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY TO THE CALENDAR OF JUDGE JOHN R. PADOVA . ( BY CLERK OF COURT MICHAEL E. KUNZ ) 11/9/01 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (jl) (Entered: 11/09/2001)

Nov. 9, 2001

Nov. 9, 2001

16

Answer with affirmative defenses to Complaint by DEFENDANT EXIDE CORPORATION , Certificate of Service. (jl) (Entered: 12/06/2001)

Dec. 6, 2001

Dec. 6, 2001

ISSUE JOINED. (jl) (Entered: 12/06/2001)

Dec. 6, 2001

Dec. 6, 2001

17

ORDER THAT THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE WILL BE HELD ON 3/18/02 AT 2:30 P.M.; ETC. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE JOHN R. PADOVA ) 2/22/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (jl) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

Feb. 22, 2002

Feb. 22, 2002

18

ORDER THAT THIS MATTER SHALL BE PLACED IN THE TRIAL POOL AS OF 8/1/02; A FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 5/23/02 IS CONTINUED TO 8/6/02 AT 10:30; THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 3/18/02 IS CONTINUED TO 5/23/02 AT 9:30; ETC. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE JOHN R. PADOVA ) 3/13/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (jl) (Entered: 03/13/2002)

March 13, 2002

March 13, 2002

19

ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED FROM THE CALENDAR OF JUDGE JOHN R. PADOVA TO THE CALENDAR OF JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY . ( SIGNED BY JUDGE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ) 4/12/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (jl) (Entered: 04/12/2002)

April 12, 2002

April 12, 2002

20

Suggestion of bankruptcy by DEFENDANT EXIDE CORPORATION under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware filed under case no. 02-11127. (jl) (Entered: 04/18/2002)

April 17, 2002

April 17, 2002

21

ORDER REFERRED TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DIANE M. WELSH FOR A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; ETC. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ) 5/21/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS. (jl) (Entered: 05/21/2002)

May 21, 2002

May 21, 2002

22

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER THAT ALL DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SHALL BE FILED NO LATER THAN 8/26/02; ALL FACT DISCOVERY SHALL BE COMPLETED BY 8/5/02 ; PLAINTIFF'S PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM DUE 9/12/02 ; DEFENDANT'S PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM DUE 9/19/02 ; THIS CASE WILL BE PLACED INTO THE TRIAL POOL ON 9/26/02; ETC. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ) 5/21/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS. (jl) (Entered: 05/21/2002)

May 21, 2002

May 21, 2002

23

STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT THE NAME OF THE DEFENDANT IN THIS ACTION SHALL BE CHANGED FROM EXIDE CORPORATION TO EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES. EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES WILL NOT ASSERT ANY DEFENSES IN THIS MATTER WHICH IN WHOLE OR IN PART ASSERT THAT IT IS IN ANY WAY NOT LIABLE FOR THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF EXIDE CORPORATION THAT OCCURRED AT THE TIME WHEN EXIDE CORPORATION EXISTED AS A CORPORATE ENTITY; INC. (SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ) 6/14/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS. (jl) (Entered: 06/14/2002)

June 14, 2002

June 14, 2002

25

ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT MARK THIS ACTION CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES AND PLACE THE MATTER IN THE CIVIL SUSPENSE FILE. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ) 7/24/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (jl) (Entered: 07/24/2002)

July 24, 2002

July 24, 2002

26

Appearance of ELISE A. FIALKOWSKI for DEFENDANT . EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES (withdrawal of appearanceo JONATHAN NADLER). (jl) (Entered: 09/06/2002)

Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

27

ORDER THAT A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED FOR 10/22/02 AT 10:00 IN ROOM 3029; ETC. ( SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DIANE M. WELSH ) 9/25/02 ENTERED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS. (jl) (Entered: 09/25/2002)

Sept. 25, 2002

Sept. 25, 2002

28

ORDER THAT THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED IN THIS MATTER FOR 10/22/02 HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED TO 11/18/02 AT 2:00 P.M.;ETC. ( SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DIANE M. WELSH ) 10/25/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS. (jl) (Entered: 10/25/2002)

Oct. 25, 2002

Oct. 25, 2002

29

CONSENT DECREE ORDER BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT THIS DECREE IS FINAL AND BINDING BETWEEN THE PARTIES SIGNATORY HERETO AS TO ALL ISSUES RAISED IN THE COMMISSION'S COMPLAINT IN CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 01-2287 AND THE COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION FILED BY ROBIN PRATT AS CIVIL ACTION NO. 01-5296. THIS DECREE IS ENTERED INTO IN COMPROMISE TO AVOID THE EXPENSES AND INCONVENIENCE OF LITIGATION AND IS NEITHER INTENDED NOR CONSTRUED AS AN ADMISSION OF LIABILITY BY DEFENDANT, WHO HAS DENIED AND CONTINUES TO DENY ANY AND ALL LIABILITY. DEFENDANT VIGOROUSLY CONTESTS EACH OF THE CLAIMS AND HAS AGREED TO SETTLE EACH OF THE CLAIMS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE COMPANY, THE BANKRUPT ESTATE AND CREDITORS TO AVOID NOT ONLY THE UNCERTAINTY OF TRIAL BUT ALSO EXPENSIVE LITIGATION. THIS CASE AND THE CASE FILED IN INTERVENTION BY ROBIN PRATT AS CIVIL ACTION NO. 01-5296 ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, SUBJECT TO THIS COURT'S JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CONSENT DECREE, ETC.. SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ON 9/5/03. 9/5/03 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(jl, ) (Entered: 09/05/2003)

Sept. 5, 2003

Sept. 5, 2003

Case Details

State / Territory: Pennsylvania

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 10, 2001

Closing Date: Sept. 5, 2003

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Unknown

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

Exide Technologies, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit