EEOC v. NALBANDIAN SALES, INC | Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

Case Profile		new search page permalink

Case Name	EEOC v. NALBANDIAN SALES, INC	EE-CA-0148
Docket / Court	F-98-5047-OWW DLB ( E.D. Cal. )
State/Territory	California
Case Type(s)	Equal Employment
Special Collection	EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization	EEOC
Case Summary	In January 1998, the San Francisco District Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Nalbandian Sales Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. However, it appears ... read more > In January 1998, the San Francisco District Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Nalbandian Sales Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. However, it appears from the consent decree that the complaint alleged that the defendant refused to hire or rehire three individuals due to their association with a person filing an employment discrimination charge against the defendant. Following a settlement conference and defendant's unsuccessful motion to dismiss in March 1998, the parties settled the lawsuit in February 1999 through a consent decree. The decree, containing a non-discrimination and non-retaliation clause, required the defendant to pay $30,000 to be distributed among three individuals. David Friedman - 12/17/2007 compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -

Issues and Causes of Action

Issues

Content of Injunction

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Discrimination-area

Hiring

EEOC-centric

Direct Suit on Merits

General

Disparate Treatment

Retaliation

Plaintiff Type

EEOC Plaintiff

Causes of Action

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Case Details


Defendant(s)	Nalbandian Sales, Inc.
Plaintiff Description	Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations	EEOC
Class action status sought	No
Class action status granted	No
Prevailing Party	Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer	Yes
Nature of Relief	Damages Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief	Settlement
Form of Settlement	Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration	1999 - 2001
Case Closing Year	1999
Case Ongoing	No

Additional Resources


	Microsoft Gender Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit Date: Oct. 14, 2016 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Age Discrimination Class Action seeks Fair Employment for Older PwC Applicants http://www.pwcagecase.com/ Date: Apr. 27, 2016 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Smith Barney Gender Discrimination https://www.lieffcabraser.com/employment/smith-barney/ Date: August 2008 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform Date: Mar. 1, 2008 By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law Faculty) Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach Date: Apr. 1, 2001 By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School Faculty) Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Documents

Docket(s)

1:98-cv-05047-OWW-DLB (E.D. Cal.)
EE-CA-0148-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 06/09/1999
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]

General Documents

Memorandum Opinion re: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(6) (36 F.Supp.2d 1206) (E.D. Cal.) EE-CA-0148-0002.pdf \| WESTLAW\| LEXIS \| Detail Date: 04/20/1998 Source: Google Scholar
Consent Decree EE-CA-0148-0001.pdf \| Detail Date: 02/05/1999

People