University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name EEOC v. Amertac Holdings, Inc. EE-NY-0007
Docket / Court 7:03-cv-06128-SCR ( S.D.N.Y. )
State/Territory New York
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization EEOC
Case Summary
The New York district office of the EEOC brought this suit against the Amertac Holdings, Inc., American Tack & Hardware Co., Inc., and two individual defendants, in August 2003 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Two complainants were allowed to intervene in June 2004. ... read more >
The New York district office of the EEOC brought this suit against the Amertac Holdings, Inc., American Tack & Hardware Co., Inc., and two individual defendants, in August 2003 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Two complainants were allowed to intervene in June 2004. The complaints for this case are not available. As of April 22, 2008, this case is still ongoing in the district court. After a couple failed attempts by the Magistrate Judge to negotiate a settlement between the parties, the most recent occurrence was in November 2007, when the jury trial was set to begin on November 10, 2008.

Shankar Viswanathan - 05/30/2008


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
EEOC-centric
Direct Suit on Merits
No EEOC Final Resolution Type
Private Party intervened in EEOC suit
General
Disparate Treatment
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Private Plaintiff
Defendant(s) American Tack & Hardware Co., Inc.
Amertac Holdings, Inc.
John Distefano
Richard Frant
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations EEOC
Class action status sought Unknown
Class action status granted Unknown
Prevailing Party None Yet / None
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief None yet
Source of Relief None yet
Case Ongoing Yes
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Microsoft Gender Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit
Date: Oct 14, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Age Discrimination Class Action seeks Fair Employment for Older PwC Applicants
http://www.pwcagecase.com/
Date: Apr 27, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Smith Barney Gender Discrimination
https://www.lieffcabraser.com/employment/smith-barney/
Date: August 2008
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Date: Mar 1, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
7:03-cv-06128-SCR (S.D.N.Y.)
EE-NY-0007-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/09/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
No documents currently in the collection
Judges Rakoff, Jed Saul Court not on record
EE-NY-0007-9000
Plaintiff's Lawyers Bissell, Katherine (New York)
EE-NY-0007-9000
Filippatos, Parisis G. (New York)
EE-NY-0007-9000
Graziano, Louis (New York)
EE-NY-0007-9000
Koplen, Michael (New York)
EE-NY-0007-9000
Yamada, Stella Natsue (New York)
EE-NY-0007-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Lajewski, Leslie Ann (Ohio)
EE-NY-0007-9000
Luckner, Steven (New Jersey)
EE-NY-0007-9000

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -