Case: EEOC v. EAGLE AIRFREIGHT, INC. a Texas Corporation

5:00-cv-00751 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma

Filed Date: April 17, 2000

Closed Date: Aug. 1, 2001

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Dallas and Oklahoma City offices of the EEOC brought this suit against Eagle USA Airfreight Inc. in April 2000, alleging racial discrimination. We do not have the complaint, so the specific allegations are not available. In September 2000, this case was consolidated with a private party suit (5:00-cv-00787-R). The EEOC filed a motion for partial summary judgment in January 2001, which was denied that February. In March 2001, a jury trial was held, and a verdict was returned in favor of the defendant. In May 2001, the EEOC appealed the verdict to the Court of Appeals, but the appeal was dismissed.

Summary Authors

Shankar Viswanathan (8/14/2008)

Related Cases

Lewis v. EGL Inc., Western District of Oklahoma (2000)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

5:00-cv-00751

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Eagle USA Airfreight

Aug. 1, 2001

Aug. 1, 2001

Docket
18

5:00-cv-00787

Order of Consolidation

Lewis v. EGL Inc

Sept. 29, 2000

Sept. 29, 2000

Order/Opinion
38

5:00-cv-00751

Order [re: Partial Summary Judgment]

EEOC v. Eagle USA Airfreight

Feb. 13, 2001

Feb. 13, 2001

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 20, 2024, 3:01 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT (eh) (Entered: 04/24/2000)

April 21, 2000

April 21, 2000

RECEIPT For Money Received in the amount of $ 150.00 by Plaintiff's Counsel, receipt # 076460 (eh) (Entered: 04/24/2000)

April 24, 2000

April 24, 2000

2

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff Jimmie L Lewis by Raymond C Durbin (cjs) (Entered: 04/27/2000)

April 26, 2000

April 26, 2000

3

ENTER ORDER by Honorable Ralph G. Thompson Case reassigned to Honorable David L. Russell (cc: all counsel) [EOD Date 5/1/00] (cjs) (Entered: 05/01/2000)

May 1, 2000

May 1, 2000

4

PRAECIPE for and issued 1 summons by plaintiff Jimmie L Lewis (brs) (Entered: 08/17/2000)

Aug. 16, 2000

Aug. 16, 2000

DOCKET STATUS/SCHEDULING CONF ; status scheduling conf set for 11:00 a.m. on 9/29/00 (brs) (Entered: 09/06/2000)

Sept. 6, 2000

Sept. 6, 2000

7

MOTION by defendant EGL Inc for attorney Nancy L Patterson to appear pro hac vice. Receipt for money received from Littler, Mendelson in the amount of $ 25.00 receipt # 079254 (brs) (Entered: 09/13/2000)

Sept. 12, 2000

Sept. 12, 2000

9

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND ORIGINAL ANSWER by defendant EGL Inc (brs) (Entered: 09/13/2000)

Sept. 12, 2000

Sept. 12, 2000

6

ORDER by Honorable David L. Russell granting motion for attorney Edward W Allred to appear pro hac vice re [5−1] (cc: all counsel) [EOD Date 9/13/00] (brs) (Entered: 09/13/2000)

Sept. 13, 2000

Sept. 13, 2000

8

ORDER by Honorable David L. Russell granting motion for attorney Nancy L Patterson to appear pro hac vice re [7−1] (cc: all counsel) [EOD Date 9/13/00] (brs) (Entered: 09/13/2000)

Sept. 13, 2000

Sept. 13, 2000

10

JOINT STATUS REPORT by plaintiff Jimmie L Lewis, defendant EGL Inc (brs) (Entered: 09/28/2000)

Sept. 27, 2000

Sept. 27, 2000

11

SCHEDULING ORDER Honorable David L. Russell ; jury trial set for 3/12/01 ; Discovery set for 2/15/01 ;mtn filing ddl set for 1/1/01 ; pretrial report due 3/1/01 ; status scheduling conference held on 11:00 9/29/00 pla's wit lst due: 1/1/01 pla's exh lst due: 1/1/01 dft's wit lst due: 1/1/01 dft's exh lst due: 1/1/01 mtns in limine due: 3/1/01 jury instr due: 3/1/01 voir dire requests due: 3/1/01 trial briefs due : 3/1/01 consolidating cases CIV−00−787−R with CIV−00−751−R (cc: all counsel) (brs) (Entered: 10/02/2000)

Sept. 29, 2000

Sept. 29, 2000

12

WITNESS list submitted by defendant EGL Inc (brs) (Entered: 01/26/2001)

Jan. 25, 2001

Jan. 25, 2001

12

EXHIBIT list by defendant EGL Inc (brs) (Entered: 01/26/2001)

Jan. 25, 2001

Jan. 25, 2001

DOCKET CIVIL JURY TRIAL ; jury trial set for 9:30 3/12/01 (brs) (Entered: 01/29/2001)

Jan. 29, 2001

Jan. 29, 2001

13

ORDER by Honorable David L. Russell ; Settlement conf set for 10:00 a.m. on 2/22/01 before Magistrate Judge Gary Purcell (cc: all counsel) [EOD Date 2/5/01] (brs) (Entered: 02/05/2001)

Feb. 5, 2001

Feb. 5, 2001

14

ENTER ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell re [13−1] , [13−2] ; Settlement conf reset to 2/20/01 at 10:00 a.m. (cc: all counsel) [EOD Date 2/7/01] (brs) (Entered: 02/07/2001)

Feb. 6, 2001

Feb. 6, 2001

15

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell ; Settlement conf was held as scheduled. The case did not settle. (cc: all counsel) [EOD Date 2/21/01] (brs) (Entered: 02/21/2001)

Feb. 20, 2001

Feb. 20, 2001

16

AMENDMENT by defendant EGL Inc to witness and exhibit lists re [12−1] (brs) (Entered: 02/21/2001)

Feb. 20, 2001

Feb. 20, 2001

17

AMENDED ANSWER [9−1] by defendant EGL Inc (brs) (Entered: 02/21/2001)

Feb. 20, 2001

Feb. 20, 2001

18

Proposed VOIR DIRE submitted by defendant EGL Inc (brs) (Entered: 03/02/2001)

March 1, 2001

March 1, 2001

19

JURY INSTRUCTIONS submitted by defendant EGL Inc (brs) (Entered: 03/02/2001)

March 1, 2001

March 1, 2001

20

MOTION by defendant EGL Inc in limine and brief in support (brs) (Entered: 03/02/2001)

March 1, 2001

March 1, 2001

21

JUDGMENT: by Honorable David L. Russell, terminating case pursuant to jury verdict in favor of Dft on all claims (cc: all counsel)

March 30, 2001

March 30, 2001

Case Details

State / Territory: Oklahoma

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 17, 2000

Closing Date: Aug. 1, 2001

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Eagle USA Airfreight Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Monetary Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination-basis:

Race discrimination

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits