Case: EEOC v. OAK-RITE MFG. CORP.

1:99-cv-01962 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

Filed Date: Dec. 30, 1999

Closed Date: Aug. 27, 2001

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In December 1999, the Indianapolis District Office filed this suit against Oak-Rite Manufacturing Corporation, a metal-working factory, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. We do not have a copy of the complaint. However, according to the Court's opinion, the complaint alleged that the defendant violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by failing to reasonably accommodate the charging party's religious beliefs. Specifically, the defendant did not hire th…

In December 1999, the Indianapolis District Office filed this suit against Oak-Rite Manufacturing Corporation, a metal-working factory, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. We do not have a copy of the complaint. However, according to the Court's opinion, the complaint alleged that the defendant violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by failing to reasonably accommodate the charging party's religious beliefs. Specifically, the defendant did not hire the charging party, a female employee, because she refused to comply with a pants-only safety policy, claiming that it violated her religious beliefs which required her to wear a long skirt. In November 2000, the plaintiff filed a partial motion for summary judgment regarding a record-keeping provision of Title VII. The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment in December 2000 regarding the religious discrimination charges. The Court granted both motions in August 2001, finding for the defendant on the religious discrimination charges. Therefore, the plaintiff did not obtain relief except for an injunction ordering the defendant to comply with the record-keeping provisions of Title VII.

Summary Authors

Michele Marxkors (6/8/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:99-cv-01962

Docket (JAMS)

Equal Employment Opportunity -vs- Oak-Rite Mfg. Corp.

May 25, 2006

May 25, 2006

Docket
59

1:99-cv-01962

Opinion: Entry on Summary Judgment Motions

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Oak-Rite Manufacturing Corporation

Aug. 27, 2001

Aug. 27, 2001

Order/Opinion

2001 WL 2001

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11237563/equal-employment-opportunity-v-oak-rite-mfg-corp/

Last updated April 7, 2024, 3:14 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT eod 12/30/99 [PLM] (Entered: 12/30/1999)

Dec. 30, 1999

Dec. 30, 1999

PACER
2

CIVIL COVER SHEET eod 12/30/99 [PLM] (Entered: 12/30/1999)

Dec. 30, 1999

Dec. 30, 1999

PACER
3

SUMMONS eod 12/30/99 [PLM] (Entered: 12/30/1999)

Dec. 30, 1999

Dec. 30, 1999

PACER
5

RETURN of service by CMRRR dated 1/3/00 on Mr. Richard Oaks. eod 02/02/00 [PLM] (Entered: 02/02/2000)

Jan. 6, 2000

Jan. 6, 2000

PACER
4

APPEARANCE BY MICHAEL J. KIAS for the deft. c/s eod 01/28/00 [PLM] (Entered: 01/28/2000)

Jan. 28, 2000

Jan. 28, 2000

PACER
6

NOTICE ASSIGNS P/T to 03/16/00 at 03:30PM Room 330 (DFH) c/m eod 02/02/00 [CEB] (Entered: 02/02/2000)

Feb. 2, 2000

Feb. 2, 2000

PACER
7

AMENDED COMPLAINT c/s PLTF eod 02/09/00 [PLM] (Entered: 02/09/2000)

Feb. 9, 2000

Feb. 9, 2000

PACER
8

APPEARANCE of William N. Ivers and Kelli R. Keller of Stewart & Irwin on behalf of defendant. c/s eod 03/03/00 [CEB] (Entered: 03/03/2000)

March 3, 2000

March 3, 2000

PACER
9

MOTION FOR TIME TO answer complaint. c/s DEFT eod 03/03/00 [CEB] (Entered: 03/03/2000)

March 3, 2000

March 3, 2000

PACER
10

ORDER grants defendant until 04/03/00 to answer the amended complaint. DFH c/m eod 03/06/00 [CEB] (Entered: 03/06/2000)

March 6, 2000

March 6, 2000

PACER
11

RESPONSE to deft's motion for enlargement of time to file answer to pltf's amended complaint. c/s PLTF eod 03/07/00 [PLM] (Entered: 03/07/2000)

March 7, 2000

March 7, 2000

PACER
12

CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED BY COUNSEL. eod 03/08/00 [PLM] (Entered: 03/08/2000)

March 8, 2000

March 8, 2000

PACER
13

ORDER ASSIGNS JURY TRIAL to 05/29/01 at 09:00AM Room 344 (DFH) c/m eod 03/16/00 [CEB] (Entered: 03/16/2000)

March 16, 2000

March 16, 2000

PACER
14

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to pltf's amended complaint and jury demand. c/s DEFT eod 04/13/00 [PLM] (Entered: 04/13/2000)

April 13, 2000

April 13, 2000

PACER
15

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT notice sent to counsel for the deft. eod 04/13/00 [PLM] (Entered: 04/13/2000)

April 13, 2000

April 13, 2000

PACER
16

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT c/s DEFT eod 05/04/00 [PLM] (Entered: 05/04/2000)

May 4, 2000

May 4, 2000

PACER
17

MOTION FOR TIME TO complete discovery relating to deft's financial condition; identification of related expert witnesses; and provision of related Rule 26(a)(2)disclosures. c/s PLTF eod 05/18/00 [PLM] (Entered: 05/18/2000)

May 18, 2000

May 18, 2000

PACER
18

ORDER GRANTS pltf's motion for time; see entry - document #17 filed 5/18/00. DFH c/m eod 05/19/00 [PLM] (Entered: 05/19/2000)

May 19, 2000

May 19, 2000

PACER
19

EXHIBIT list (preliminary) c/s PLTF eod 06/09/00 [PLM] (Entered: 06/09/2000)

June 9, 2000

June 9, 2000

PACER
20

WITNESS LIST (preliminary) c/s PLTF eod 06/09/00 [PLM] (Entered: 06/09/2000)

June 9, 2000

June 9, 2000

PACER
21

EXHIBIT list. c/s (preliminary) DEFT eod 06/13/00 [PLM] (Entered: 06/13/2000)

June 13, 2000

June 13, 2000

PACER
22

NOTICE TO COURT OF RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S SETTLEMENT DEMAND. c/s DEFT eod 06/20/00 [CEB] (Entered: 06/20/2000)

June 19, 2000

June 19, 2000

PACER
23

MOTION for leave to file a second amended complaint. c/s PLTF eod 07/12/00 [PLM] (Entered: 07/12/2000)

July 12, 2000

July 12, 2000

PACER
24

MEMORANDUM to support pltf's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. c/s PLTF eod 07/12/00 [PLM] (Entered: 07/12/2000)

July 12, 2000

July 12, 2000

PACER
25

SUBMISSION of evidentiary materials in support of motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. c/s eod 07/12/00 [PLM] (Entered: 07/12/2000)

July 12, 2000

July 12, 2000

PACER
26

ORDER that pltf's proposed second amended complaint be filed. DFH c/m eod 07/19/00 [PLM] (Entered: 07/19/2000)

July 19, 2000

July 19, 2000

PACER
27

AMENDED COMPLAINT (second) PLTF eod 07/19/00 [PLM] (Entered: 07/19/2000)

July 19, 2000

July 19, 2000

PACER
28

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to pltf's second amended complaint and jury demand. c/s DEFT eod 08/17/00 [PLM] (Entered: 08/17/2000)

Aug. 16, 2000

Aug. 16, 2000

PACER
29

EXHIBIT list (supplemental prel) c/s PLTF eod 10/18/00 [CBU] (Entered: 10/18/2000)

Oct. 18, 2000

Oct. 18, 2000

PACER
30

WITNESS LIST (supplemental prel) c/s PLTF eod 10/18/00 [CBU] (Entered: 10/18/2000)

Oct. 18, 2000

Oct. 18, 2000

PACER
31

MOTION TO WITHDRAW supplemental preliminary exhibit list and to file supplemental preliminary exhibit list. c/s PLTF eod 10/19/00 [PLM] (Entered: 10/19/2000)

Oct. 19, 2000

Oct. 19, 2000

PACER
34

EXHIBIT list (supplemental preliminary list) c/s DEFT eod 10/20/00 [PLM] (Entered: 10/20/2000)

Oct. 19, 2000

Oct. 19, 2000

PACER
32

ORDER that the supplemental preliminary exhibit list pltf filed on 10/18/00 be WITHDRAWN, and the supplemental preliminary exhibit list submitted on 10/19/00 be FILED. DFH c/m eod 10/20/00 [PLM] (Entered: 10/20/2000)

Oct. 20, 2000

Oct. 20, 2000

PACER
33

EXHIBIT - Supplemental preliminary exhibit list. c/s PLTF eod 10/20/00 [PLM] (Entered: 10/20/2000)

Oct. 20, 2000

Oct. 20, 2000

PACER
35

DEFENDANT'S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL PRELIMINARY LIST OF WITNESSES AND EXHIBITS. c/s eod 11/09/00 [CEB] (Entered: 11/09/2000)

Nov. 9, 2000

Nov. 9, 2000

PACER
36

MOTION FOR S/J (partial) c/s PLTF eod 11/14/00 [PLM] (Entered: 11/14/2000)

Nov. 14, 2000

Nov. 14, 2000

PACER
37

MEMORANDUM to support pltf's motion for partial s/j. c/s PLTF eod 11/14/00 [PLM] (Entered: 11/14/2000)

Nov. 14, 2000

Nov. 14, 2000

PACER
38

STATEMENT of material facts in support of its motion for partial s/j. PLTF eod 11/14/00 [PLM] (Entered: 11/14/2000)

Nov. 14, 2000

Nov. 14, 2000

PACER
39

SUBMISSION of evidentiary materials in support of motion for partial s/j. PLTF eod 11/14/00 [PLM] (Entered: 11/14/2000)

Nov. 14, 2000

Nov. 14, 2000

PACER
40

APPEARANCE of Kenneth L. Bird and Jamie D. Prenkert of the EEOC. c/s PLTF eod 12/01/00 [PLM] (Entered: 12/01/2000)

Dec. 1, 2000

Dec. 1, 2000

PACER
41

APPEARANCE of Stephen J. Peters of Srewart & Irwin on behalf of defendant. c/s eod 12/05/00 [CEB] (Entered: 12/05/2000)

Dec. 5, 2000

Dec. 5, 2000

PACER
42

MOTION FOR S/J c/s DEFT eod 12/06/00 [CEB] (Entered: 12/06/2000)

Dec. 6, 2000

Dec. 6, 2000

PACER
43

BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. c/s DEFT eod 12/06/00 [CEB] (Entered: 12/06/2000)

Dec. 6, 2000

Dec. 6, 2000

PACER
44

DEFENDANT'S STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS PERTINENT TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. c/s DEFT eod 12/06/00 [CEB] (Entered: 12/06/2000)

Dec. 6, 2000

Dec. 6, 2000

PACER
45

DFEENDANT'S DESIGNATION OF EVIDENTIARY MATERIALS PERTINENT TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT. c/s DEFT eod 12/06/00 [CEB] (Entered: 12/06/2000)

Dec. 6, 2000

Dec. 6, 2000

PACER
46

DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION AND LIMITED CONSENT TO PLAINTIFF'S PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMWNT. c/s DEFT eod 12/19/00 [CEB] (Entered: 12/19/2000)

Dec. 18, 2000

Dec. 18, 2000

PACER
47

DEFENDANT'S DESIGNATION OF MATERIALS IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. c/s DEFT eod 12/19/00 [CEB] (Entered: 12/19/2000)

Dec. 18, 2000

Dec. 18, 2000

PACER
48

MOTION FOR TIME TO respond to defendant's motion for summary judgment. c/s PLTF eod 12/22/00 [CEB] (Entered: 12/22/2000)

Dec. 22, 2000

Dec. 22, 2000

PACER
49

RESPONSE to deft's motion for s/j. c/s PLTF eod 01/08/01 [PLM] (Entered: 01/08/2001)

Jan. 8, 2001

Jan. 8, 2001

PACER
50

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL FACTS. c/s PLTF eod 01/08/01 [PLM] (Entered: 01/08/2001)

Jan. 8, 2001

Jan. 8, 2001

PACER
51

RESPONSE to deft's statement of undisputed material facts pertinent to motion for s/j. c/s PLTF eod 01/08/01 [PLM] (Entered: 01/08/2001)

Jan. 8, 2001

Jan. 8, 2001

PACER
52

SUBMISSION OF DESIGNATION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENTIARY MATERIALS. c/s PLTF eod 01/08/01 [PLM] (Entered: 01/08/2001)

Jan. 8, 2001

Jan. 8, 2001

PACER
53

ORDER - plaintiff may file its response to deft's motion for s/j on or before 02/16/01. DFH c/m eod 01/11/01 [PLM] (Entered: 01/11/2001)

Jan. 11, 2001

Jan. 11, 2001

PACER
54

REPLY BRIEF in support of deft's motion for summary judgment. c/s DEFT eod 01/23/01 [PLM] (Entered: 01/23/2001)

Jan. 23, 2001

Jan. 23, 2001

PACER
55

RESPONSE to pltf's statement of additional material facts. c/s DEFT eod 01/23/01 [PLM] (Entered: 01/23/2001)

Jan. 23, 2001

Jan. 23, 2001

PACER
56

SURREPLY to defendant's response to pltf's statement of additional material facts. c/s PLTF eod 02/02/01 [PLM] (Entered: 02/02/2001)

Feb. 2, 2001

Feb. 2, 2001

PACER
57

ENTRY - Telephonic conference held to address objections made by defendant to certain questions posed by plaintiff to defendant's expert; the Court sustained the objections. DFH c/m eod 04/23/01 [CEB] (Entered: 04/23/2001)

April 23, 2001

April 23, 2001

PACER
58

ENTRY VACATES JURY TRIAL of 05/29/01 at 09:00AM Room 344 (DFH) c/m eod 04/23/01 [CEB] (Entered: 04/23/2001)

April 23, 2001

April 23, 2001

PACER
59

ENTRY GRANTS the EEOC's s/j on its record-keeping claim against Oak-Rite. The court will issue a permanent injunction and final judgment. DFH c/m eod 08/27/01 [PLM] (Entered: 08/27/2001)

Aug. 27, 2001

Aug. 27, 2001

Clearinghouse
60

CLOSED Judgment - PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND FINAL JUDGMENT. OBV 47 PG 757 eod 08/27/01 [PLM] (Entered: 08/27/2001)

Aug. 27, 2001

Aug. 27, 2001

PACER
61

FRC shipped on 05/25/06; Accession # 021-06-0099; Location # 783245-783390; Box 72 eod 08/23/06 [SDP] (Entered: 08/23/2006)

May 25, 2006

May 25, 2006

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Indiana

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 30, 1999

Closing Date: Aug. 27, 2001

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Oak-Rite Manufacturing Corporation, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Mixed

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Recordkeeping

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Accommodation / Leave

Hiring

Discrimination-basis:

Religion discrimination

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits