Case: EEOC v. COMPREHENSIVE BENEFIT CONSULTANTS

2:04-cv-03076 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Filed Date: July 21, 2004

Closed Date: 2009

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The New York District Office brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, against Comprehensive Benefit Consultants. The complaint, filed in July 2004, alleged sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; specifically that Defendant subjected the charging parties to a sexually hostile work environment, constructive discharge and retaliation because of their sex, female. Defendant moved for summary judgment in February 2006…

The New York District Office brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, against Comprehensive Benefit Consultants. The complaint, filed in July 2004, alleged sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; specifically that Defendant subjected the charging parties to a sexually hostile work environment, constructive discharge and retaliation because of their sex, female. Defendant moved for summary judgment in February 2006 but the motion was denied in April 2006.

The parties entered into a consent decree in December 2006. The decree, valid for three years, required Defendant to pay the four charging parties a total of $150,000 (individual amounts not specified in the decree) and enjoined Defendant from discriminating in violation of Title VII. Defendant was required to provide Title VII training to its employees, post a notice of non-discrimination at its facility, and report regularly to the EEOC about internal complaints of discrimination and its compliance with the decree. The docket sheet doesn't show any further enforcement took place; the case was presumably closed in 2009.

Summary Authors

Shankar Viswanathan (7/19/2007)

Clearinghouse (6/11/2017)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4318786/parties/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-comprehensive-benefits/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Adams, Raechel L. (New York)

Altmeyer, Helen Campbell (New York)

Anderson, Kenneth P. (New York)

Anderson, Suzanne M (New York)

Andrew, Regina Maria (New York)

Attorney for Defendant
Judge(s)

Wexler, Leonard D. (New York)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Adams, Raechel L. (New York)

Altmeyer, Helen Campbell (New York)

Anderson, Kenneth P. (New York)

Anderson, Suzanne M (New York)

Andrew, Regina Maria (New York)

Arendes, Jennifer L. (New York)

Attorney, Prim F. (New York)

AUSA, James J. (New York)

AUSA, Owen C.J. (New York)

Awad, Wasan (New York)

Backhaus, William C (New York)

Bailey, Terri Hearn (New York)

Banks, Oshia (New York)

Bannon, Jeffrey C (New York)

Baran, Andrea G. (New York)

Batog, Konrad (New York)

Bean, Julie Steptoe (New York)

Bell, Charles T. (New York)

Biscardi-Andre, Beatriz (New York)

Burstein, Jeffrey Charles (New York)

Butler, Michelle T. (New York)

Caiola, Michelle Anne (New York)

Calhoun, June Wallace (New York)

Call, Gary L. (New York)

Canino, Robert A (New York)

Carrillo, Gina E (New York)

Chahbazi, Meenoo (New York)

Chandy, Sunu P. (New York)

Che, May R (New York)

Chen, Mark H (New York)

Cheung, Raymond T. (New York)

Cohen, Ethan M (New York)

Cole, Holly Waldron (New York)

Coleman, Charles Franklin (New York)

Cook, Terrence R. (New York)

Cooper, Ronald S (New York)

Costas, Toby W (New York)

Cox, Lisa Ann (New York)

Crook, Debra Hawes (New York)

Crout, Joseph M. (New York)

Curtin, Nora Ellen (New York)

Davis, Chandra Cain (New York)

Dawkins, Robert K. (New York)

DeCamp, Aaron Rutledge (New York)

Deck, Dayna F. (New York)

Denig, Jessica A (New York)

Dixon, Pamela (New York)

Dreiband, Eric S (New York)

Dreilinger, Lauren Gayle (New York)

Driscoll-MacEachron, James P (New York)

Dubey, Devika S (New York)

Edge, Dawn M. (New York)

Elkin, Laurie S. (New York)

Farrell, Michael J (New York)

Feldman, Laura R (New York)

Fiorito, Bradley S. (New York)

Fischer, Kurt S (New York)

Flores, Carmen (New York)

Foslid, Kristen Marie (New York)

Fox, Rosemary J (New York)

Gochanour, Gregory M (New York)

Graham, Nancy Eleanor (New York)

Graziano, Louis (New York)

Grossman, Elizabeth (New York)

Guerrier, Charles E. (New York)

Gusewelle, Anne E. (New York)

Haden, Kara L (New York)

Hamilton, Deborah L (New York)

Harper, Donna (New York)

Healy, Teri L. (New York)

Hendrickson, John C (New York)

Henry, Ann Marie (New York)

Hill, Keith T. (New York)

Hobson, William R (New York)

Holman, Patrick J (New York)

Hope, Jennifer L. (New York)

Imdieke, Michael H. (New York)

Isenhart, Jessi D. (New York)

Johnson, Robert G. (New York)

Jones, Anica C. (New York)

Jones, Stephanie Michelle (New York)

Jr, Robert A (New York)

Kamp, Jean P (New York)

Kane, Deborah A. (New York)

Keenan, Judy Ann (New York)

Kennedy, Melvin D. (New York)

Kinne, Paul A. (New York)

Kittle, Rita Byrnes (New York)

Klaassen, Mark A (New York)

Krivonyak, J. Christopher (New York)

Kuelbs, Meaghan Leigh (New York)

Laura, Peter F. (New York)

Lawrence, Debra M. (New York)

Lee, Damien Anthony (New York)

Lee, James L. (New York)

Lee, Jeff A (New York)

Lee, Jeffrey A. (New York)

Lepak, Thomas Scott (New York)

Lewis, Muslima (New York)

Li, Derek W (New York)

Liem, Connie (New York)

Liner, Celia S. (New York)

Lopez, P David (New York)

Lucero, A.Luis Lucero (New York)

Macy, James Douglas (New York)

Mahood, Zoe G (New York)

Mallik, Amrita (New York)

Malloy, Margaret Ann (New York)

Marino, Stephanie (New York)

Martin, C Levi (New York)

Martinez, Ana Consuelo (New York)

Maxion, Sanya Hill (New York)

McBride, Dennis R (New York)

McCord, Stacey Elise (New York)

McCoy, Matthew H (New York)

McCoy-Cruz, Kimberly A. (New York)

McNair, Jacqueline H. (New York)

Meredith, Brandi Lorraine (New York)

Miller, Gerald L (New York)

Moench, William E (New York)

Monahan, Camille A (New York)

Murray, Steven Lee (New York)

Naccarato, Elizabeth A (New York)

Neary, Kathleen M. (New York)

Northrup, Kate (New York)

O'Boyle, Judith A. (New York)

O'Brien, Michael J. (New York)

Offen-Brown, David F. (New York)

O'Hara, Cindy (New York)

Olson, Kathryn Blaire (New York)

O'Neill, Mary Jo (New York)

Oppenheim, Harriett F (New York)

Palmer-Denig, Jessica Ann (New York)

Park, Anna (New York)

Parker, Russell P (New York)

Pearson, Gina Elaine (New York)

Peck, Jonathan T (New York)

Pence, Richard M. (New York)

Peral, Cesar J (New York)

Peters, Kirsten Jennifer (New York)

Peterson, Melanie M. (New York)

Phillips, Ronald L. (New York)

Pladson, Nicholas J (New York)

Pohl, Anna Marie (New York)

Powell, Molly P. (New York)

Ramos, Marisol (New York)

Ramsey, Sally (New York)

Ranis, Michael Bruce (New York)

Ratliff, Sean (New York)

Reams, Gwendolyn Young (New York)

Rens, LaVerne G. (New York)

Rethage, Thomas D (New York)

Rivela, David C. (New York)

Rivera, Jadhira Virginia (New York)

Roberts, Monique Joy (New York)

Robertson, Michelle M (New York)

Rose, Robert David (New York)

Rucker, Marsha Lynn (New York)

Ryerse, Mary M (New York)

Sanghvi, Ami T. (New York)

Santos, Adela P. (New York)

Savage, Markeisha K. (New York)

Schmitt, Suzanne Julia (New York)

Schnitzel, Andrew Marten (New York)

Seely, Barbara A (New York)

Seth, Devika Rani (New York)

Sexton, Richard I (New York)

Sirkin, Lisa (New York)

Smason, Diane I (New York)

Smith, Deidre (New York)

Smith, Rachel M. (New York)

Smith, C Emanuel (New York)

Stanley, John F. (New York)

Statkus, Carol A (New York)

Steele, Roberta (New York)

Stewart, Ronald S (New York)

Stith, Rebecca S. (New York)

Struble, Stephanie (New York)

Szromba, Jeanne Bowman (New York)

Tamayo, William R. (New York)

Taylor, Judith G. (New York)

Tetzlaff, Karl R. (New York)

Thomas, Kelley Renee (New York)

Thomas, Gillian Lathrop (New York)

Thornton, Gerald L. (New York)

Tomlinson, Robert F (New York)

Turnage, Edwin Lake (New York)

Tyndall, Brian C (New York)

Valderrama, Hillary K (New York)

Vance, Carrie Noelle (New York)

Varma, Maneesh (New York)

Vasichek, Laurie A (New York)

Vuong, Rumduol Kim (New York)

Wagner, Steven Andrews (New York)

Walter, Nicholas Glen (New York)

Weisberg, Robert E. (New York)

Welsh, Blaine T (New York)

Whitehead, Jamal N (New York)

Wilburn, Tanisha R (New York)

Williams, Faye A (New York)

Wong, Kam Sau (New York)

Woolley, Christopher (New York)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:04-cv-03076

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Comprehensive Benefits Consultants

Dec. 20, 2006

Dec. 20, 2006

Docket
1

2:04-cv-03076

Complaint

EEOC v. Comprehensive Benefits Consultants

July 21, 2004

July 21, 2004

Complaint
31

2:04-cv-03076

Amended Complaint

EEOC v. Comprehensive Benefits Consultants

Feb. 10, 2005

Feb. 10, 2005

Complaint
32

2:04-cv-03076

[Minute Order]

EEOC v. Comprehensive Benefits Consultants

Feb. 11, 2005

Feb. 11, 2005

Order/Opinion
40

2:04-cv-03076

[Minute Order]

EEOC v. Comprehensive Benefits Consultants

March 15, 2005

March 15, 2005

Order/Opinion
47

2:04-cv-03076

Memorandum and Order

EEOC v. Comprehensive Benefits Consultants

March 30, 2005

March 30, 2005

Order/Opinion
52

2:04-cv-03076

[Minute Order]

EEOC v. Comprehensive Benefits Consultants

April 12, 2005

April 12, 2005

Order/Opinion
55

2:04-cv-03076

Memorandum and Order [Denying Dft's Motion to Compel]

EEOC v. Comprehensive Benefits Consultants

April 20, 2005

April 20, 2005

Order/Opinion
57

2:04-cv-03076

Memorandum and Order [Affirming the Magistrate's Ruling]

EEOC v. Comprehensive Benefits Consultants

April 25, 2005

April 25, 2005

Order/Opinion
62

2:04-cv-03076

Memorandum and Order [Re: Protective Orders]

EEOC v. Comprehensive Benefits Consultants

May 18, 2005

May 18, 2005

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4318786/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-comprehensive-benefits/

Last updated March 17, 2024, 3:15 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against Comprehensive Benenits Consultants, filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Duong, Susan) (Entered: 07/23/2004)

2 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

July 21, 2004

July 21, 2004

PACER
2

Case set to ECF status. All civil actions before this Judge are ECF matters. It is MANDATORY that you file all original documents electronically. Please refer to the Judge's Individual Rules. From this point forward, original documents are REQUIRED to be filed electronically and forward a hard copy, labeled courtesy copy, to chambers. The Judges' Individual Rules of Chambers and further information on ECF may be found at the website for the Eastern District of New York at www.nyed.uscourts.gov. (Duong, Susan) (Entered: 07/23/2004)

July 21, 2004

July 21, 2004

PACER
4

ANSWER to Complaint filed by Comprehensive Benenits Consultants.(Montero, Edher) (Entered: 08/04/2004)

July 29, 2004

July 29, 2004

PACER
3

ORDER setting initial conference for 8/27/04 at 11:30 a.m. Signed by Judge James Orenstein on 8/2/04. CM to defendant(Branciforte, Ralph) (Entered: 08/02/2004)

Aug. 2, 2004

Aug. 2, 2004

PACER
5

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Equal Employment Opportunity. Comprehensive Benenits Consultants waiver sent on 7/24/2004, answer due 9/22/2004. (Montero, Edher) (Entered: 08/16/2004)

Aug. 4, 2004

Aug. 4, 2004

PACER
11

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Montero, Edher) (Entered: 09/02/2004)

Aug. 4, 2004

Aug. 4, 2004

PACER
6

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Comprehensive Benenits Consultants waiver sent on 7/22/2004, answer due 9/20/2004. (Montero, Edher) (Entered: 08/24/2004)

Aug. 4, 2004

Aug. 4, 2004

PACER
7

REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 08/26/2004)

Aug. 26, 2004

Aug. 26, 2004

PACER
8

Minute Entry for proceedings held before James Orenstein : Initial Conference Hearing held on 8/27/2004. The next status conference will be held on November 22, 2004, at 9:30 a.m. THE FOLLOWING RULINGS WERE MADE: The case will be referred to mediation with the consent of the parties. Counsel are directed to contact the undersigned at the earlier of the conclusion of the mediation process or three business days before the next scheduled conference as to whether the conference should be re-scheduled. A discovery plan and other deadlines will be set at the next conference. (Orenstein, James) (Entered: 08/27/2004)

Aug. 27, 2004

Aug. 27, 2004

PACER
9

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Signed by Judge James Orenstein on August 27, 2004. (Orenstein, James) (Entered: 08/27/2004)

Aug. 27, 2004

Aug. 27, 2004

PACER
10

MEDIATION INSTRUCTIONS sent to Counsel. Letter of Instructions document attached. COUNSELS are to schedule the mediation and confirm in writing by 09/14/2004 to Gerald P. Lepp, ADR Administrator, the name of the mediator and the date of the first mediation session. Counsels are to confer with each other and to speak with the Mediator in selecting a Mediator and the Mediation session date(s). See the attached instructions. See the web pages: http://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/adr/ http://www.nyed.circ2.dcn/dadr/ Register for ECF if you have not yet done so. Thank you. See: http://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/CM_ECF/ECF_FAQ/ecf_faq.html(Lepp, Gerald)(dc) (Entered: 08/30/2004)

Aug. 30, 2004

Aug. 30, 2004

PACER
12

Selection of Mediator. Robert Lewis has been selected.(Lepp, Gerald)(dc) (Entered: 09/15/2004)

Sept. 15, 2004

Sept. 15, 2004

PACER
13

Selection of MEDIATOR. Robert Lewis, Esq. has been selected as Mediator. The first mediation session is scheduled for 11/10/2004 at 10:30 a.m. at the Eastern District of New York Courthouse in CENTRAL ISLIP. COUNSELS must file with the Mediator: 1) immediately, their client's Complaint or Answer together with their respective client's Automatic Disclosure Statements; and 2) by 11/03/2004 their client's mediation statement outlining facts, legal issues, prior settlement discussions, and the name and title of the client representative with settlement authority who will attend the mediation session in person. Attendance in person is required of the trial counsel, insurance adjustor, and client representative with full settlement authority. The Mediator?s contact information is: Robert Lewis, Esq., 20 Sinclair Drive, Kings Point, NY, 10024; Tel.: 516-482-1448; email: Lewis202@optonline.net (Lepp, Gerald)(dc) (Entered: 09/15/2004)

Sept. 15, 2004

Sept. 15, 2004

PACER
14

SCHEDULING of Mediation update per Miranda Sokoloff LLP letter dated Sept. 23, 2004. [The LETTER is attached.] Mediation Date is November 17, 2004 at 10:30 a.m. Robert Lewis, Esq. has been selected as Mediator. The mediation session is now scheduled for 11/17/2004 at 10:30 a.m. at the Eastern District of New York Courthouse in CENTRAL ISLIP. COUNSELS must file with the Mediator: 1) immediately, their client's Complaint or Answer together with their respective client's Automatic Disclosure Statements; and 2) by 11/10/2004 their client's mediation statement outlining facts, legal issues, prior settlement discussions, and the name and title of the client representative with settlement authority who will attend the mediation session in person. Attendance in person is required of the trial counsel, insurance adjustor, and client representative with full settlement authority. The Mediator's contact information is: Robert Lewis, Esq., 20 Sinclair Drive, Kings Point, NY, 10024; Tel.:516-482-1448; email: Lewis202@optonline.net(Lepp, Gerald)(dc) (Entered: 09/27/2004)

Sept. 27, 2004

Sept. 27, 2004

PACER
15

Letter from Monique J. Roberts, EEOC Trial Attorney to Magistrate Judge James Orenstein Regarding Request for Leave to amend EEOC's complaint to add another retaliation claim. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 11/19/2004)

Nov. 19, 2004

Nov. 19, 2004

PACER
16

Minute Entry for proceedings held before James Orenstein : Status Conference held on 11/22/2004. The next status conference will be held on February 22, 2005, at 9:30 a.m. A pretrial conference will be held on May 23, 2005, at 9:30 a.m. THE FOLLOWING RULINGS WERE MADE: Plaintiff will serve a proposed amended complaint by Wednesday, November 24, 2004. By the same date, plaintiff will either provide the names of all persons within the scope or Rule 26(a)(1) or submit a letter motion seeking a protective order. In light of the time wasted on mediation that appears never to have had a realistic prospect of resolving the case, I will enter a scheduling order that contemplates the case being ready for trial in six months; if the parties seek an modification of that schedule they must make a timely written application setting forth the steps they have taken to comply and good cause to believe that they cannot complete discovery in the allotted time through diligent efforts. (Orenstein, James) (Entered: 11/22/2004)

Nov. 22, 2004

Nov. 22, 2004

PACER
17

SCHEDULING ORDER: First Request for Production of Documents or Request for Interrogatories due by: December 27, 2004. Deadline for Joinder of Additional Parties: January 31, 2005. Deadline for Amendment of Pleadings: January 31, 2005. Status Conference: February 22, 2005, at 9:30 a.m. All discovery to be completed by: April 18, 2005. Dispositive motion process started by: May 2, 2005. Pretrial Order to be filed by: May 16, 2005. Pretrial Conference: May 23, 2005, at 9:30 a.m. Signed by Judge James Orenstein on November 22, 2004. (Orenstein, James) (Entered: 11/22/2004)

Nov. 22, 2004

Nov. 22, 2004

PACER
18

First MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit A# 3 Exhibit A# 4 Exhibit B)(Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 11/23/2004)

2 Exhibit A

View on PACER

3 Exhibit A

View on PACER

4 Exhibit A

View on PACER

5 Exhibit B

View on PACER

Nov. 23, 2004

Nov. 23, 2004

PACER
19

First MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 11/23/2004)

Nov. 23, 2004

Nov. 23, 2004

PACER
20

First MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 11/23/2004)

Nov. 23, 2004

Nov. 23, 2004

PACER
21

Letter from Monique J. Roberts to Judge James Orenstein Regarding names of claimants. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 11/23/2004)

Nov. 23, 2004

Nov. 23, 2004

PACER
22

RESPONSE to Motion re 18 First MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint, 19 First MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint, 20 First MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint filed by Comprehensive Benenits Consultants. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 12/02/2004)

Dec. 2, 2004

Dec. 2, 2004

PACER
23

Letter from Monique J. Roberts, Trial Attorney Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to Magistrate Judge James Orenstein Regarding Defendant's Failure to Make Disclosure or Cooperate in Discovery. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 02/01/2005)

Feb. 1, 2005

Feb. 1, 2005

PACER
24

Letter from Brian S. Sokoloff to Hon. James Orenstein Regarding plaintiff's letter to the Court, dated February 1, 2005. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 02/03/2005)

Feb. 3, 2005

Feb. 3, 2005

PACER
25

Letter from Brian S. Sokoloff to Magistrate Judge James Orenstein Regarding defendant's request for an order compelling plaintiff to answer interrogatories and document requests. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 02/03/2005)

Feb. 3, 2005

Feb. 3, 2005

PACER
26

ORDER RE: 18 Motion to Amend -- For the reasons set forth in this order, the Commission's motion to amend the complaint to assert an additional claim of retaliation is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Commission may renew its application if, by February 14, 2005, it submits a revised proposed amended complaint that alleges in good faith that the filing of Russo's defamation claim is attributable to CBC. Signed by Judge James Orenstein on 2/4/05. (Branciforte, Ralph) (Entered: 02/04/2005)

Feb. 4, 2005

Feb. 4, 2005

PACER
27

Letter from Brian S. Sokoloff to Magistrate Judge James Orenstein Regarding request for production of documents claimed to be privileged. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 02/06/2005)

Feb. 6, 2005

Feb. 6, 2005

PACER
28

ORDER -- The status conference is rescheduled from February 8, 2005 to February 11, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. The conference will be held in Courtroom 920 before the undersigned. All parties shall appear in person. Signed by Judge James Orenstein on 2/7/05. (Branciforte, Ralph) (Entered: 02/07/2005)

Feb. 7, 2005

Feb. 7, 2005

PACER
29

Letter from Monique J. Roberts, Trial Attorney EEOC to Magistrate Judge James Orenstein Regarding EEOC's Opposition to Defendant's Letter Motion to Compel Discovery. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 02/10/2005)

Feb. 10, 2005

Feb. 10, 2005

PACER
30

Letter from Monique J. Roberts, Trial Attorney EEOC to Magistrate James Orenstein Regarding EEOC's Opposition to Defendant's Demand to Disclose Privileged Documents. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 02/10/2005)

Feb. 10, 2005

Feb. 10, 2005

PACER
31

AMENDED DOCUMENT by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Amendment to 26 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct,,,,, Complaint. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 02/10/2005)

Feb. 10, 2005

Feb. 10, 2005

PACER
32

Minute Entry for proceedings held before James Orenstein : Status Conference held on 2/11/2005. SCHEDULING: The status conference previously scheduled for February 22, 2005 is cancelled. The next pretrial conference will be held on May 23, 2005, at 9:30 a.m. THE FOLLOWING RULINGS WERE MADE: (1) Defendant will respond to plaintiff's Document Request ("DR") 1 with the relevant personnel files. (2) Plaintiff's request to compel production of defendant's contracts with Phoenix and Guardian (DR 14) is GRANTED. (3) Plaintiff's request to compel production of tax records (DR 16) is DENIED. (4) Plaintiff's request to compel further responses to Interrogatories 15-16 is DENIED. (5) Defendant's application to compel production of documents that continue to be subject to a claim of privilege or to compel further clarification of the privilege log is DENIED in light of the information in plaintiff's counsel's letter of February 10, 2005. (6) Defendant's request for authorizations for the release of records held by the described potential witnesses (DR 7) is GRANTED, subject to the parties agreeing on an appropriate protective order. (7) Defendant's request for cell phone and email information is resolved as follows: (a) The cell phone records will be subpoenaed and defendant's counsel will identify, by name or telephone number, the relevant information being sought therein; plaintiff's counsel will provide redacted copies of the records showing that relevant information. (b) The plaintiff will provide all relevant emails as requested; defendant's application to subpoena emails from the service provider is DENIED without prejudice to renew if there is reason to believe that such a subpoena will lead to the discovery of admissible evidence not otherwise available. (8) The defendant's remaining requests to compel discovery are denied on the understanding that plaintiff will supplement its responses to the requests at issue notwithstanding the objections it has previously raised and without waiving those objections. (Orenstein, James) (Entered: 02/11/2005)

Feb. 11, 2005

Feb. 11, 2005

PACER
33

Letter from Brian S. Sokoloff to Hon. James Orenstein Regarding request to so order a subpoena. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 02/28/2005)

Feb. 28, 2005

Feb. 28, 2005

PACER
34

STIPULATION and Order Governing the Treatment of Confidental Material by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 03/03/2005)

March 3, 2005

March 3, 2005

PACER
35

Letter MOTION to Quash Subpoena of Robert M. Bursky, Esq. by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 03/07/2005)

March 7, 2005

March 7, 2005

PACER
36

RESPONSE in Opposition re 35 Letter MOTION to Quash Subpoena of Robert M. Bursky, Esq. filed by Comprehensive Benefits Consultants. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 03/09/2005)

March 9, 2005

March 9, 2005

PACER
37

Letter from Monique J. Roberts to Magistrate Judge James Orenstein Regarding scheduling of depositions. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 03/10/2005)

March 10, 2005

March 10, 2005

PACER
38

Letter MOTION to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum for Craig Addeo by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 03/10/2005)

March 10, 2005

March 10, 2005

PACER
39

TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 2/11/05 before Judge Michael L. Orenstein. Court Transcriber: Ron Rudolph, 620 Riverside Dr., Fairfield, CT 06430. (Montero, Edher) (Entered: 03/14/2005)

March 10, 2005

March 10, 2005

PACER
40

Minute Entry for proceedings held before James Orenstein : Status Conference held on 3/15/2005. SCHEDULING: (1) The next status conference will be held on May 31, 2005, at 10:30 a.m. (2) A pretrial conference will be held on July 25, 2005, at 11:00 a.m. THE FOLLOWING RULINGS WERE MADE: (1) For the reasons discussed on the record at the conference, plaintiff's motion to quash the subpoena on claimant Addeo's attorney is GRANTED. I conclude that the claimant and Susan Nally sought the advice of counsel together and had a common interest, that their meeting with the attorney was therefore privileged, and that there has not been an effective waiver of claimant Addeo's privilege to allow the deposition to proceed. To the extent that there were limited waivers by Ms. Addeo -- such as counsel's explanation of what the initials EEOC stand for and his belief that documentary evidence and witnesses would be important -- they do not constitute a waiver as to all related communications. Further, allowing inquiry into the limited areas as to which there has been a waiver would not be reasonably likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, particularly since the opinion of an attorney as to the persuasiveness of evidence is not admissible. (2) Defendant will respond by March 17, 2005, to plaintiff's application to quash the subpoena on Craig Addeo. (3) The parties will submit portions of the transcript of the deposition of Fran Angelone relevant to my consideration of plaintiff's renewed application to have me review in camera documents claimed by plaintiff to be privileged. (4) By March 22, 2005, plaintiff will either produce Laura Hart's diary, as discussed at the conference, or confirm that it no longer exists. If it is produced and there is a question about its provenance, defendant will make further application as appropriate. If such further application is predicated on assertions about Ms. Hart's credibility, then Mr. Sokoloff must be available as a witness rather than as counsel to pursue the application. (5) Discovery is extended by 60 days. I will enter a separate amended case management and scheduling order reflecting the new deadlines. (Orenstein, James) (Entered: 03/15/2005)

March 15, 2005

March 15, 2005

PACER
41

SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Conference: May 31, 2005, at 10:30 a.m. All discovery to be completed by: June 20, 2005. Dispositive motion process started by: July 5, 2005. Pretrial Order to be filed by: July 19, 2005. Pretrial Conference: July 25, 2005, at 11:00 a.m. Signed by Judge James Orenstein on March 15, 2005. (Orenstein, James) (Entered: 03/15/2005)

March 15, 2005

March 15, 2005

PACER
42

RESPONSE to Motion re 38 Letter MOTION to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum for Craig Addeo filed by Comprehensive Benefits Consultants. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 03/16/2005)

March 16, 2005

March 16, 2005

PACER
43

Letter MOTION for Protective Order regarding privileged conversations between Susan Nally, Jean Marie Addeo and Attorney Robert Bursky by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 03/17/2005)

March 17, 2005

March 17, 2005

PACER
45

TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 4/15/05 before Judge J. Orenstein, USMJ. (Terry Gribben's Transcripton Service) (Imrie, Robert) (Entered: 03/29/2005)

March 24, 2005

March 24, 2005

PACER
44

RESPONSE to Motion re 43 Letter MOTION for Protective Order regarding privileged conversations between Susan Nally, Jean Marie Addeo and Attorney Robert Bursky filed by Comprehensive Benefits Consultants. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 03/29/2005)

March 29, 2005

March 29, 2005

PACER
46

APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court by Comprehensive Benefits Consultants re 40 Status Conference,,,,,,,,, (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 03/29/2005)

March 29, 2005

March 29, 2005

PACER
47

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Re: 38 Motion to Quash and 43 Motion for Protective Order -- plaintiff EEOC's application for a protective order and its motion to quash the subpoena duces tecum directed to Craig Addeo are both DENIED. (see attached order). Signed by Judge James Orenstein on 3/30/05. (Branciforte, Ralph) (Entered: 03/30/2005)

March 30, 2005

March 30, 2005

PACER
48

Letter from Brian S. Sokoloff to Magistrate Judge James Orenstein Regarding Laura Hart's computer. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 04/04/2005)

April 4, 2005

April 4, 2005

PACER
49

Letter from Monique J. Roberts to Magistrate James Orenstein Regarding EEOC's Opposition to Defendant's request for a computer expert's examination of Laura Hart's home computer. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 04/06/2005)

April 6, 2005

April 6, 2005

PACER
50

Letter from Steven C. Stern to Magistrate Judge James Orenstein Regarding enclosing Hart's diary entries. (Stern, Steven) (Entered: 04/11/2005)

April 11, 2005

April 11, 2005

PACER
51

Letter from Monique J. Roberts to the Honorable Leonard D. Wexler Regarding Plaintiff EEOC's request that Magistrate Orenstein's Order of March 15, 2005 quashing the subpoena duces tecum served on Attorney Robert Bursky be upheld.. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 04/11/2005)

April 11, 2005

April 11, 2005

PACER
52

Minute Entry for proceedings held before James Orenstein : Telephone Conference held on 4/12/2005. SCHEDULING: (1) The next status conference will be held on May 31, 2005, at 10:30 a.m. (2) A pretrial conference will be held on July 25, 2005, at 11:00 a.m. THE FOLLOWING RULINGS WERE MADE: (1) The defendant's application to allow an expert to examine Ms. Hart's computer (docket entry 48) is DENIED. (2) By April 19, 2005, plaintiff's counsel will submit a letter reporting on (1) the date of last modification of the computer file for the diary indicated on the appropriate directory of Ms. Hart's computer, and (2) whether the EEOC has ever made a request for documents to Ms. Hart to which the diary would have been responsive and, if so, whether Ms. Hart did provide the diary in response. Based on the contents of that report, I will consider whether there is good cause to revisit the preceding denial of the defendant's application. (Orenstein, James) (Entered: 04/12/2005)

April 12, 2005

April 12, 2005

PACER
53

MOTION to Compel Craig Addeo to respond to subpoena duces tecum by Comprehensive Benefits Consultants. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 04/18/2005)

April 18, 2005

April 18, 2005

PACER
54

Letter from Monique J. Roberts to Magistrate James Orenstein Regarding Laura Hart's computer diary. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 04/19/2005)

April 19, 2005

April 19, 2005

PACER
55

ORDER Re: 53 Motion to Compel -- The relief requested in the instant motion would have no independent effect, and I decline to issue such a meaningless order. The motion is therefore DENIED as moot. Counsel for CBC is directed to serve a copy of this order on Mr. Addeo and to file a certificate attesting to such service. (see attached order) Signed by Judge James Orenstein on 4/20/05. (Branciforte, Ralph) (Entered: 04/20/2005)

April 20, 2005

April 20, 2005

RECAP
57

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION: This court has reviwed the parties' submissions and the order of the Mag/Judge and concludes that the order appealed from should be affirmed. Accordingly, defendant's objections are hereby overruled and the Order of Mag/Judge James Orenstein dtd. 3/15/05 is affirmed. SO ORDERED (signed by Judge Leonard D. Wexler on 4/25/05). c/m(Montero, Edher) (Entered: 04/26/2005)

April 25, 2005

April 25, 2005

RECAP
56

MOTION to Compel non-party Craig Addeo to respond to CBC's subpeona duces tecum by Comprehensive Benefits Consultants. (Verveniotis, Steven) (Entered: 04/26/2005)

April 26, 2005

April 26, 2005

PACER
58

Letter MOTION for Protective Order prohibiting the deposition of EEOC Trial Attorney Robert Rose by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 05/11/2005)

May 11, 2005

May 11, 2005

PACER
59

Letter dtd. 5/13/05 from Craig Addeo to USMJ J. Orenstein RE: Requesting that the subpoena served on 5/4/05 be quashed. (Branciforte, Ralph) (Entered: 05/16/2005)

May 16, 2005

May 16, 2005

PACER
60

RESPONSE in Opposition re 58 Letter MOTION for Protective Order prohibiting the deposition of EEOC Trial Attorney Robert Rose filed by Comprehensive Benefits Consultants. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 05/17/2005)

May 17, 2005

May 17, 2005

PACER
61

Letter from Brian S. Sokoloff to Magistrate Judge James Orenstein Regarding Craig Addeo request to quash subpoena to him. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 05/17/2005)

May 17, 2005

May 17, 2005

PACER
62

ORDER re 58, 59, 60, 61 -- EEOC's application for a protective order is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, in that CBC may take the deposition of attorney Rose, but only as to a very limited subject and only in writing. I further ORDER that CBC shall report by May 25, 2005, as to whether it will either take Mr. Rose's deposition pursuant to the preceding protective order or seek to challenge in any way the veracity of Ms. Hart's testimony that Mr. Sokoloff opined that the tape was inadmissible, and also ORDER that the Commission shall report by the same date as to whether it will seek to offer evidence about the tape at the trial of this case. Further, Craig Addeo's motion to quash the subpoena duces tecum issued by CBC is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, in that Mr. Addeo must produce only those documents reflecting money or property given to Mrs. Addeo by Mr. Addeo's business (and not by him in his individual capacity); the subpoena is quashed as to all other items. Counsel for CBC is directed to serve a copy of this order on Mr. Addeo. Signed by Judge James Orenstein on 5/18/05. (See Attached Order) (Branciforte, Ralph) (Entered: 05/18/2005)

May 18, 2005

May 18, 2005

RECAP
63

Minute Entry for proceedings held before James Orenstein. Discovery Conference held on 5/27/2005. THE FOLLOWING RULINGS WERE MADE: The parties called from a deposition with a dispute regarding claimant Fran Angilone's medical records; during the telephone conference, the parties resolved the dispute on their own. (Branciforte, Ralph) (Entered: 05/27/2005)

May 27, 2005

May 27, 2005

PACER
64

Minute Entry for proceedings held before James Orenstein : Telephone Conference held on 5/31/2005. SCHEDULING: The next pretrial conference will be held on July 25, 2005, at 11:00 a.m. THE FOLLOWING RULINGS WERE MADE: (1) The deadline for defendant to report as to whether it will take Mr. Rose's deposition on written questions (see Docket Entry 62) is extended until June 24, 2005. The parties will complete all other discovery and seek to settle the case; if they fail to settle, and if CBC thereafter decides to take Mr. Rose's testimony, I will schedule further proceedings as appropriate to address defendant's counsel's role as a potential witness. (2) Prior to the pretrial conference, all parties must submit by mail or fax (not by ECF) a one-page, ex parte settlement position to the undersigned. These statements will be treated as confidential, and will not be docketed. Meaningful settlement discussions will occur at this conference; clients or other persons with full settlement authority must be available by telephone. (Orenstein, James) (Entered: 05/31/2005)

May 31, 2005

May 31, 2005

PACER
65

MOTION for Contempt against Craig Addeo by all defendants. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 06/01/2005)

June 1, 2005

June 1, 2005

PACER
66

ORDER re: 65 Motion for Contempt -- Mr. Addeo is directed to respond to defendant's motion to compel by June 6, 2005. A conference is scheduled for June 8, 2005 to discuss defendant's motion. The conference will be held in Courtroom 920. Mr. Addeo shall appear with the records at issue for the Court's review. Mr. Sokoloff is directed to serve this order on Mr. Addeo and file a certificate of service stating same. Approved by Judge James Orenstein on 6/2/05.(Branciforte, Ralph) (Entered: 06/02/2005)

June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

PACER
67

Letter dtd. 6/1/05 from Craig Addeo RE: subpoena. (Branciforte, Ralph) (Entered: 06/03/2005)

June 3, 2005

June 3, 2005

PACER
68

Minute Entry for proceedings held before James Orenstein: Discovery Hearing held on 6/6/2005. THE FOLLOWING RULINGS WERE MADE: I resolved two disputes that arose during the continued deposition of claimant Jean Marie Addeo. (1) The plaintiff's instruction to the deponent not to answer questions seeking the content of marital communications was sustained, without prejudice to the defendant seeking to overcome the privilege by submitting reason to conclude that the deponent has waived it. (2) In light of the conduct of defendant's principal, Mr. Russo, during the deposition, I ruled that the deposition would be allowed to continue for another half-hour only without Mr. Russo present. (Branciforte, Ralph) (Entered: 06/06/2005)

June 6, 2005

June 6, 2005

PACER
69

Letter from Brian S. Sokoloff to Magistrate Judge James Orenstein Regarding cancellation of conference. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 06/06/2005)

June 6, 2005

June 6, 2005

PACER
70

Letter from Brian S. Sokoloff to Hon. James Orenstein Regarding plaintiff not complying with the Court's order. (Verveniotis, Steven) (Entered: 07/13/2005)

July 13, 2005

July 13, 2005

PACER
71

Letter from Brian S. Sokoloff, Esq. to Hon. James Orenstein Regarding permission for further deposition of plaintiff. (Verveniotis, Steven) (Entered: 07/13/2005)

July 13, 2005

July 13, 2005

PACER
72

ORDER re 70 Letter, 71 Letter -- A telephone status conference is scheduled for July 19, 2005 at 9:30 a.m. to discuss CBC's applications. Any responses to CBC's respective applications shall be filed, with a courtesy copy delivered to me by fax, no later than 12:00 p.m. on July 18, 2005. The EEOC is directed to serve this order on Mr. Addeo upon receipt and file a certificate of service stating same. Signed by Judge James Orenstein on 7/14/05. (Branciforte, Ralph) (Entered: 07/14/2005)

July 14, 2005

July 14, 2005

PACER
73

Letter from EEOC to Magistrate James Orenstein Regarding EEOC's opposition to Defendant's request for a third deposition of Jean Marie Addeo. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 07/14/2005)

July 14, 2005

July 14, 2005

PACER
74

Letter from EEOC to Magistrate Orenstein Regarding EEOC's request for an adjournemnt of the July 19, 2005 conference. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 07/15/2005)

July 15, 2005

July 15, 2005

PACER
75

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission of Magistrate Orenstein's Order of July 14, 2005 on Craig Addeo (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 07/15/2005)

July 15, 2005

July 15, 2005

PACER
76

Letter dtd. 7/18/05 from Craig Addeo to Brian Sokoloff RE: Responding to your letter dtd. 6/20/05 (attached as an exhibit to Docket Entry 70). (Branciforte, Ralph) (Entered: 07/18/2005)

July 18, 2005

July 18, 2005

PACER
77

Minute Entry for proceedings held before James Orenstein : Status Conference held on 7/25/2005. SCHEDULING: The next pretrial conference will be held on September 26, 2005, at 3:00 p.m. [NOTE: The time of the conference has been changed to 3:00 p.m. to avoid a scheduling conflict.] THE FOLLOWING RULINGS WERE MADE: (1) The defendants' application to take further deposition testimony from Ms Addeo was denied. (2) The scheduling order is further amended as follows: (a) Defendants written deposition questions for Mr. Rose to be served by August 8, 2005. (b) Plaintiff to serve Mr. Rose's answers by August 15, 2005. (c) Joint Pretrial Order to be filed by September 12, 2005. (3) The parties discussed settlement in good faith but did not reach an agreement. (Orenstein, James) (Entered: 07/25/2005)

July 25, 2005

July 25, 2005

PACER
78

Letter from Brian S. Sokoloff to Hon. James Orenstein Regarding request for order directing Robert Rose to answer written deposition questions. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 08/17/2005)

Aug. 17, 2005

Aug. 17, 2005

PACER
79

Letter from Brian S. Sokoloff to Magistrate Judge Orenstein Regarding request for extension of time for parties to file pretrial order. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 09/08/2005)

Sept. 8, 2005

Sept. 8, 2005

PACER
80

Letter from Brian S. Sokoloff to Hon. Leonard D. Wexler Regarding request for premotion conference. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 09/08/2005)

Sept. 8, 2005

Sept. 8, 2005

PACER
81

Letter from EEOC to Magistrate Judge James Orenstein Regarding filing the joint pre-trial order. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 09/10/2005)

Sept. 10, 2005

Sept. 10, 2005

PACER
82

Letter from EEOC to District Court Judge Leonard Wexler Regarding EEOC's opposition to Defendant's request for a pre-motion conference to file a motion for summary judgment. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 09/10/2005)

Sept. 10, 2005

Sept. 10, 2005

PACER
83

Letter from Brian S. Sokoloff to Hon. Leonard D. Wexler Regarding pre-motion conference. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 09/13/2005)

Sept. 13, 2005

Sept. 13, 2005

PACER
84

Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Joint PreTrial Order by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (O'Brien, Michael) (Entered: 09/27/2005)

Sept. 27, 2005

Sept. 27, 2005

PACER
85

Proposed Pretrial Order Jointly Filed by Comprehensive Benefits Consultants and by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 10/05/2005)

Oct. 5, 2005

Oct. 5, 2005

PACER
86

Proposed Pretrial Order Amended and Jointly filed by Comprehensive Benefits Consultants and by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 10/06/2005)

Oct. 6, 2005

Oct. 6, 2005

PACER
87

Minute Entry for proceedings held before James Orenstein : Final Pretrial Conference held on 10/7/2005. SCHEDULING: The next telephone status conference will be held on April 24, 2006, at 9:30 a.m. THE FOLLOWING RULINGS WERE MADE: (1) Discovery is complete and the parties have submitted a joint pretrial order that substantially complies with Judge Wexler's individual practice rules. I will enter a separate order certifying the case as ready for trial. (2) The pretrial order reflects several disputes based on discovery rather than evidentiary issues. At the next conference, to the extent those issues remain pending, the parties will discuss a schedule for litigating motions to preclude as a sanction for failure to provide discovery. (3) The parties discussed settlement but did not reach an agreement. (Orenstein, James) (Entered: 10/07/2005)

Oct. 7, 2005

Oct. 7, 2005

PACER
91

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Leonard D. Wexler on 10/7/05 at 11:00 am. Case called. Counsel for all parties present. Pre Motion Conference held. Deft's request to file motion for summary judgment is granted. Deft to serve summary judgment papers within 6 weeks. Plaintiff to respond within one month. Deft to reply within five days thereafter. Trial set for July, 2006. (Montero, Edher) (Entered: 11/01/2005)

Oct. 7, 2005

Oct. 7, 2005

PACER
88

ORDER: the joint pretrial order is accepted for filing and the action is deemed ready for trial. Ordered by Judge James Orenstein on October 7, 2005. (Orenstein, James) (Entered: 10/07/2005)

Oct. 7, 2005

Oct. 7, 2005

PACER
89

LETTER dtd 10/18/05 from Counsel for Plaintiff to Judge Wexler re: It is my understanding that Defendant has six weeks from October 7, 2005, the date of the conference, to file its motion-not six weeks after Mr. Sokoloff's trial ends, as he contends. (Mierzejewski, Elizabeth) (Entered: 10/27/2005)

Oct. 24, 2005

Oct. 24, 2005

PACER
90

ORDER re 89 Letter. The time in which to make a motion runs from the date of the conference held on 10/7/06. . Ordered by Judge Leonard D. Wexler on 10/24/05. (Mierzejewski, Elizabeth) (Entered: 10/27/2005)

Oct. 24, 2005

Oct. 24, 2005

PACER
92

Letter from Brian S. Sokoloff to Judge Leonard D. Wexler Regarding request for extension of time to file summary judgment motion. (Sokoloff, Brian) (Entered: 11/10/2005)

Nov. 10, 2005

Nov. 10, 2005

PACER
93

Letter from Monique J. Roberts to Judge Wexler Regarding extension of time to respond to Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 11/14/2005)

Nov. 14, 2005

Nov. 14, 2005

PACER
94

ORDER GRANTING the 92 Letter Application for an extension of time for the defendant to file its motion for summary judgment to December 2, 2005. The Court also grants the request of the EEOC for the extension requested in the letter of 11/14/05.. Ordered by Judge Leonard D. Wexler on 11/15/05. (Mierzejewski, Elizabeth) (Entered: 11/16/2005)

Nov. 15, 2005

Nov. 15, 2005

PACER
95

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendant's Summary Judgement Motion by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Roberts, Monique) (Entered: 01/13/2006)

Jan. 13, 2006

Jan. 13, 2006

PACER
96

Letter requesting additional time to submit reply to summary judgment motion by Comprehensive Benefits Consultants. (Stern, Steven) (Entered: 01/30/2006)

Jan. 30, 2006

Jan. 30, 2006

PACER
97

Letter requesting to file a 15-page reply brief by Comprehensive Benefits Consultants. (Stern, Steven) (Entered: 02/15/2006)

Feb. 15, 2006

Feb. 15, 2006

PACER
98

Notice of MOTION for Summary Judgment by Comprehensive Benefits Consultants. (Stern, Steven) (Entered: 02/17/2006)

Feb. 17, 2006

Feb. 17, 2006

PACER
99

AFFIDAVIT in Support re 98 Notice of MOTION for Summary Judgment Declaration of Steven C. Stern by Comprehensive Benefits Consultants. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Notice regarding the filing of exhibits in paper form)(Stern, Steven) (Entered: 02/17/2006)

2 Exhibit Notice regarding the filing of exhibits in paper form

View on PACER

Feb. 17, 2006

Feb. 17, 2006

PACER
100

MEMORANDUM in Support re 98 Notice of MOTION for Summary Judgment by Comprehensive Benefits Consultants. (Stern, Steven) (Entered: 02/17/2006)

Feb. 17, 2006

Feb. 17, 2006

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: New York

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: July 21, 2004

Closing Date: 2009

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Comprehensive Benefit Consultants, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 150000

Order Duration: 2006 - 2009

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Reporting

Recordkeeping

Monitoring

Issues

General:

Retaliation

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Other Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc)

Discrimination-basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex or Gender:

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits