University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name EEOC v. PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES, INC. EE-CA-0168
Docket / Court 3:99-cv-02600-WHA ( N.D. Cal. )
State/Territory California
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization EEOC
Case Summary
The EEOC's San Francisco District Office brought this suit against Petco Animal Supplies in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, in June 1999. We do not have a copy of the complaint; however, according to an EEOC summary of the case, the defendant was accused of ... read more >
The EEOC's San Francisco District Office brought this suit against Petco Animal Supplies in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, in June 1999. We do not have a copy of the complaint; however, according to an EEOC summary of the case, the defendant was accused of violating the Equal Pay Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by failing to pay female store managers at equal wage rates as males in those same positions. After some scheduling orders, the parties settled in December 1999 through a consent decree. According to the EEOC summary of the case, the decree apparently required the defendant to pay $41,024, to be distributed among five individuals, as well as an undisclosed amount for attorneys' fees. In addition, the defendant was required to change its compensation criteria to make the factors more objective.

Michele Marxkors - 05/30/2007


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Affected Gender
Female
Discrimination-area
Pay / Benefits
Discrimination-basis
Sex discrimination
EEOC-centric
Direct Suit on Merits
General
Disparate Treatment
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Causes of Action Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e
Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d)
Defendant(s) Petco Animal Supplies, Inc.
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations EEOC
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Damages
Source of Relief Settlement
Form of Settlement Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Case Closing Year 1999
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Microsoft Gender Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit
Date: Oct. 14, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Age Discrimination Class Action seeks Fair Employment for Older PwC Applicants
http://www.pwcagecase.com/
Date: Apr. 27, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Smith Barney Gender Discrimination
https://www.lieffcabraser.com/employment/smith-barney/
Date: August 2008
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Date: Mar. 1, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
3:99-cv-02600-WHA (N.D. Cal.)
EE-CA-0168-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/04/2000
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Highlights of Equal Pay Act Cases
EE-CA-0168-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 06/10/2003

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -