Case: EEOC v. ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.

4:01-cv-40202 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Filed Date: July 26, 2001

Closed Date: Dec. 31, 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The EEOC's Detroit district office sued Aramark Services, Inc. on July 26,2001 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. The EEOC's complaint alleged that the defendant violated Title VII when it discriminated based on sex (female) by creating a hostile work environment for two of its female employees. The parties entered into a consent decree on July 8, 2002, which stipulated that the defendant would pay the complainants $6,000 in damages, post a notice of compliance with Title VII, and provide Title VII training to its food service account employees.

Summary Authors

Aaron Weismann (7/16/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

	Document
4:01-cv-40202	Docket [PACER] EEOC v. Aramark Svc Inc	July 8, 2002	July 8, 2002 Docket
9 4:01-cv-40202	First Amended Complaint EEOC v. Aramark Services, Inc.	Jan. 11, 2002	Jan. 11, 2002 Complaint
15 4:01-cv-40202	Joint Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice and Consent Decree EEOC v. Aramark Services, Inc	July 8, 2002	July 8, 2002 Settlement Agreement

show / hide documents

Resources

Title	Description		External URL Date / External URL
Under the Radar: Visibility and the Effects of Discrimination Lawsuits in Small and Large Firms Carly Knight, Frank Dobbin, Alexandra Kalev	Research on how discrimination lawsuits affect corporate diversity has yielded mixed results. Qualitative studies highlight the limited efficacy of lawsuits in the typical workplace, finding that lit…	April 1, 2022	April 1, 2022 https://cris.tau.ac.il/...

show / hide resources

Docket

Last updated March 23, 2024, 3:09 a.m.

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
1	COMPLAINT; jury demand (dw) (Entered: 07/27/2001)	July 26, 2001	July 26, 2001
2	ANSWER by defendant Aramark Svc Inc to complaint [1-1] with proof of mailing (dw) (Entered: 09/14/2001)	Sept. 13, 2001	Sept. 13, 2001
2	AFFIRMATIVE defenses by defendant Aramark Svc Inc with proof of mailing (dw) (Entered: 09/14/2001)	Sept. 13, 2001	Sept. 13, 2001
3	NOTICE of setting scheduling conference for 2:00 10/25/01 (dw) (Entered: 09/17/2001)	Sept. 14, 2001	Sept. 14, 2001
4	NOTICE of non-admission of attorney Nicole Porter (th) (Entered: 09/27/2001)	Sept. 24, 2001	Sept. 24, 2001
5	STATEMENT of disclosure of corporate affiliations and financial interests by defendant Aramark Svc Inc with proof of mailing (dw) (Entered: 10/23/2001)	Oct. 19, 2001	Oct. 19, 2001
6	DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) with proof of mailing (dw) (Entered: 11/08/2001)	Nov. 7, 2001	Nov. 7, 2001
7	ORDER by Judge Paul V. Gadola, setting deadline for discovery for 4/5/02 , setting deadline for witness list for 3/1/02 , setting deadline for filing dispositive motions for 5/3/02 , setting deadline for proposed joint final pretrial order for 8/12/02 , setting joint final pretrial conference for 2:00 8/19/02 and setting trailing trial docket for 9/3/02 with proof of mailing [EOD Date 1/14/02] (dw) (Entered: 01/14/2002)	Jan. 9, 2002	Jan. 9, 2002
8	STIPULATION by defendant Aramark Svc Inc and plaintiff EEOC for leave to amend its complaint in order to correct dates [EOD Date: 1/22/02] (dw) (Entered: 01/22/2002)	Jan. 11, 2002	Jan. 11, 2002
9	AMENDED complaint 1 by plaintiff EEOC; jury demand (dw) (Entered: 01/22/2002)	Jan. 11, 2002	Jan. 11, 2002
10	PROTECTIVE order by Judge Paul V. Gadola, with stipulation, for defendant Aramark Svc Inc and plaintiff EEOC to protect the confidentiality of personnel related information [EOD Date: 1/28/02] (dw) Modified on 02/13/2002 (Entered: 01/28/2002)	Jan. 23, 2002	Jan. 23, 2002
11	First amended ANSWER by defendant Aramark Svc Inc to amended complaint by EEOC [9-1]; jury demand with proof of mailing (dw) (Entered: 02/08/2002)	Feb. 4, 2002	Feb. 4, 2002
11	AFFIRMATIVE defenses by defendant Aramark Svc Inc to Plaintiff EEOC'S 1st Amended Complaint with proof of mailing (dw) (Entered: 02/08/2002)	Feb. 4, 2002	Feb. 4, 2002
12	ORDER by Judge Paul V. Gadola that case is dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right of plaintiff [EOD Date: 3/29/02] (dw) (Entered: 03/29/2002)	March 29, 2002	March 29, 2002
13	MOTION by plaintiff EEOC for extension of time in the Court's order of dismissal with brief, attachment and proof of service (dw) (Entered: 05/22/2002)	May 21, 2002	May 21, 2002
14	ORDER by Judge Paul V. Gadola granting motion for extension of time in the Court's order of dismissal by EEOC [13-1] with proof of service [EOD Date 6/18/02] (dw) (Entered: 06/18/2002)	June 13, 2002	June 13, 2002
15	ORDER by Judge Paul V. Gadola, with stipulation and consent decree, that case is dismissed with prejudice [EOD Date: 7/9/02] (dw) (Entered: 07/09/2002)	July 8, 2002	July 8, 2002