University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
HOME ABOUT FOR TEACHERS SEARCH QUESTIONS RECENT ADDITIONS feedback/
suggestions 		log in/
register
Case Profile
 new search
page permalink
Case Name EEOC v. ODOM ANTENNAS, INC. EE-AR-0037
Docket / Court LR-C-97-1061 ( E.D. Ark. )
State/Territory Arkansas
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization EEOC
Case Summary
In December 1997 the Memphis Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Odom Antennas Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations are unknown. However, it appears from the consent decree that the ... read more >
In December 1997 the Memphis Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Odom Antennas Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations are unknown. However, it appears from the consent decree that the defendant allegedly subjected complainants, female employees, to sexual harassment and retaliated against them after they opposed such practice in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Following some discovery, the parties settled the lawsuit through a consent decree in December 1998. The consent decree required the defendant to pay $34,000 to three individuals.

David Friedman - 11/02/2007

compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
 click to show/hide detail
Issues
Affected Gender
Female
Discrimination-area
Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff
Harassment / Hostile Work Environment
Discrimination-basis
Sex discrimination
EEOC-centric
Direct Suit on Merits
General
Disparate Treatment
Retaliation
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Causes of Action Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000e
Case Details
 click to show/hide detail
Defendant(s) Odom Antennas Inc.
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations EEOC
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Damages
Source of Relief Settlement
Form of Settlement Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Case Closing Year 1998
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
 click to show/hide detail
Case Studies Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Written: Mar. 01, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Documents
 click to show/hide detail
Docket(s)
4:97-cv-01061-HW (E.D. Ark.)
EE-AR-0037-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/10/1998
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Order [re: Motion to Compel Discovery] (E.D. Ark.)
EE-AR-0037-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/20/1998
Consent Decree
EE-AR-0037-0002.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/10/1998
Consent Judgment (E.D. Ark.)
EE-AR-0037-0003.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/10/1998
People
 click to show/hide detail
Judges Woods, Henry Court not on record
EE-AR-0037-0001

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -
Michigan University School of Law