University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name EEOC v. Los Padres Inn, Inc., d/b/a Yuma Airport Travelodge EE-AZ-0072
Docket / Court CIV 02 1205 PHX MS ( D. Ariz. )
State/Territory Arizona
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization EEOC
Case Summary
In June 2002 the Phoenix and Albuquerque offices of the EEOC brought this suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona against Los Padres Inn Inc., Summit Hotel Management Company d/b/a Yuma Airport Travelodge, and Tipton Management Company. The EEOC complaint is unavailable, and the ... read more >
In June 2002 the Phoenix and Albuquerque offices of the EEOC brought this suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona against Los Padres Inn Inc., Summit Hotel Management Company d/b/a Yuma Airport Travelodge, and Tipton Management Company. The EEOC complaint is unavailable, and the exact allegations are unknown. After answering the EEOC complaint, each defendant filed cross-claims against a co-defendant.

The case was settled by the entry of three consent decrees beginning in October 2003. All cross-claims between defendants were dismissed. They consisted of (1) a consent decree between EEOC and Summit Hotel Management Company; (2) a consent decree between EEOC and Los Padres Inn, Inc.; and (3) a consent decree between EEOC and Tipton Management Company. It appears from the docket that Tipton Management Company was the entity from which the EEOC obtained relief in the form of $5,000.00. The consent decrees are unavailable; therefore any additional relief is unknown.

Kevin Wilemon - 10/19/2007


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
EEOC-centric
Direct Suit on Merits
General
Disparate Treatment
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Defendant(s) L J Benjamin
Los Padres Inn, Inc.
Summit Hotel Management Company
Tipton Management Company
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations EEOC
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Damages
Source of Relief Settlement
Form of Settlement Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Case Closing Year 2003
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Microsoft Gender Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit
Date: Oct. 14, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Age Discrimination Class Action seeks Fair Employment for Older PwC Applicants
http://www.pwcagecase.com/
Date: Apr. 27, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Smith Barney Gender Discrimination
https://www.lieffcabraser.com/employment/smith-barney/
Date: August 2008
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Date: Mar. 1, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
Date: Apr. 1, 2001
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
2:02-cv-01205-EHC (D. Ariz.)
EE-AZ-0072-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/30/2003
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
No documents currently in the collection

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -