University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Docket / Court 2:98-cv-00525-WLD ( W.D. Wash. )
State/Territory Washington
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Case Summary
The Seattle office of the EEOC entered this suit as an intervenor plaintiff against American Seafoods Company in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in September 1998. With private counsel, the plaintiffs had filed a lawsuit in state court which was then removed to the ... read more >
The Seattle office of the EEOC entered this suit as an intervenor plaintiff against American Seafoods Company in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in September 1998. With private counsel, the plaintiffs had filed a lawsuit in state court which was then removed to the District Court for the Western District of Washington. We do not have a copy of the intervenor complaint, but it alleged discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. More specifically, the complaint alleged American Seafoods Company violated Title VII by subjecting Vietnamese employees to unlawful harassment and inequitable conditions of employment, by preventing them from being promoted, subjecting them to demotion, reducing their wages and constructively discharging them. After several discovery motions filed by the private plaintiffs were granted and several partial motions for summary judgment were granted, the parties settled the case in September 1999 through the entry of a consent decree.

The consent decree included non-discrimination and non-retaliation clauses, required the defendant to develop an anti-discrimination policy and post and distribute the policy. The defendant was also required to train all management and supervisory employees with regard to job training and promotion programs for processors and policies and procedures regarding discrimination and harassment. Additional training was required of vessel personnel and was required to include a videotaped presentation by a high ranking official within American Seafoods emphasizing the company's commitment to conduct hiring, job assignment, training and promotion practices in a non-discriminatory manner. The decree also called for the establishment of a job training and promotion program for processors to increase the employment opportunities for processors. The defendant was also required to utilize a Consent Decree Administrator to investigate employee complaints of discrimination. In addition, the decree required American Seafoods to report to the EEOC on internal and external complaints of discrimination and give the EEOC access to personnel officials, managers, and other employees. The injunctive parts of the decree had a two year term. If the EEOC found non-compliance, the decree required the EEOC to give notice to American Seafoods and allow for mediation prior to the application to the Court for enforcement. American Seafoods also agreed to pay $1,250,000 to the eighteen employees to be distributed by plaintiffs' private counsel and American Seafoods.

Justin Kanter - 06/06/2008

compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Content of Injunction
Comply with advertising/recruiting requirements
Develop anti-discrimination policy
Discrimination Prohibition
Implement complaint/dispute resolution process
Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law
Provide antidiscrimination training
Retaliation Prohibition
Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff
Harassment / Hostile Work Environment
Other Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc)
Pay / Benefits
National origin discrimination
EEOC intervened in private suit
Intervention in Private Suit
Disparate Treatment
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Private Plaintiff
Asian/Pacific Islander
Causes of Action State Anti-Discrimination Law
State law
Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000e
Defendant(s) American Seafoods Company
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Damages
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Settlement
Form of Settlement Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration 1999 - 2001
Case Closing Year 1999
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Microsoft Gender Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit
Date: Oct. 14, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Age Discrimination Class Action seeks Fair Employment for Older PwC Applicants
Date: Apr. 27, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Smith Barney Gender Discrimination
Date: August 2008
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Date: Mar. 1, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law Faculty)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
Date: Apr. 1, 2001
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School Faculty)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

2:98-cv-0525-WLD (W.D. Wash.)
EE-WA-0004-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 09/21/1999
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Order on Plaintiffs' Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (W.D. Wash.)
EE-WA-0004-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 06/01/1999
Order on Defendant's Motion to Bifurcate (W.D. Wash.)
EE-WA-0004-0003.pdf | Detail
Date: 06/11/1999
Consent Decree
EE-WA-0004-0005.pdf | Detail
Date: 09/21/1999

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -