University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name EEOC v. AMOCO CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. & BP AMOCO CORP. EE-TX-0016
Docket / Court H-99-1414 ( S.D. Tex. )
State/Territory Texas
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization EEOC
Case Summary
The EEOC's Houston district office sued Amoco Chemical Company, Inc. and BP Amoco Corporation on May 10, 1999 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The EEOC alleged that the defendant violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act when it discriminated based on age. ... read more >
The EEOC's Houston district office sued Amoco Chemical Company, Inc. and BP Amoco Corporation on May 10, 1999 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The EEOC alleged that the defendant violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act when it discriminated based on age. The EEOC filed a motion for partial summary judgment in April 2000 and refiled it in July 2000, which was denied as moot in September 2000. Amoco filed a motion for summary judgment in July 2000 which was never resolved. The parties entered into a consent decree on October 30, 2000, which stipulated that the defendant would pay $100,000 in damages; provide ADEA training to its human resources personnel, interviewers, and applicants to the Texas City plant; and report compliance with the training requirement to the EEOC.

Aaron Weismann - 07/02/2007


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Content of Injunction
Discrimination Prohibition
Hire
Provide antidiscrimination training
Reporting
Retaliation Prohibition
Discrimination-area
Hiring
Discrimination-basis
Age discrimination
EEOC-centric
Direct Suit on Merits
General
Disparate Treatment
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Defendant(s) AMOCO Chemical Company Inc
BP AMOCO Corp
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations EEOC
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Damages
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Settlement
Form of Settlement Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration 2000 - 2003
Case Closing Year 2000
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Microsoft Gender Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit
Date: Oct. 14, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Age Discrimination Class Action seeks Fair Employment for Older PwC Applicants
http://www.pwcagecase.com/
Date: Apr. 27, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Smith Barney Gender Discrimination
https://www.lieffcabraser.com/employment/smith-barney/
Date: August 2008
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Date: Mar. 1, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
Date: Apr. 1, 2001
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
4:99-cv-01414 (S.D. Tex.)
EE-TX-0016-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/30/2000
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Order [Denying Motion for Partial Summary Judgment] (S.D. Tex.)
EE-TX-0016-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 09/22/2000
Consent Decree
EE-TX-0016-0002.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/24/2000

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -