EEOC v. ROBERT BOSCH CORPORATION | Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

Case Profile		new search page permalink

Case Name	EEOC v. ROBERT BOSCH CORPORATION	EE-MI-0138
Docket / Court	5:03-cv-00150-RHB ( W.D. Mich. )
State/Territory	Michigan
Case Type(s)	Equal Employment
Special Collection	EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization	EEOC
Case Summary	In September 2003, the Detroit office of the EEOC brought this Title VII suit against Robert Bosch Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan. The complaint alleged that the defendant discriminated against the claimant by failing to provide the claimant with a ... read more > In September 2003, the Detroit office of the EEOC brought this Title VII suit against Robert Bosch Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan. The complaint alleged that the defendant discriminated against the claimant by failing to provide the claimant with a reasonable accommodation and terminating him because of his religion (Seventh-day Adventist). The claimant intervened in the EEOC's suit in December 2003. The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment in December 2003, and the court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant in October 2004. The EEOC appealed the case in December 2004, and the Sixth Circuit vacated the judgment and remanded the case in February 2006. The case went to trial in September 2006, and the jury entered a verdict in favor of the defendant in September 2006. Kevin Wilemon - 07/09/2007 compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -

Issues and Causes of Action

Issues

Discrimination-area

Accommodation / Leave

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Discrimination-basis

Religion discrimination

EEOC-centric

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit

General

Disparate Treatment

Plaintiff Type

EEOC Plaintiff

Private Plaintiff

Causes of Action

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Case Details


Defendant(s)	Robert Bosch Corporation
Plaintiff Description	Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations	EEOC
Class action status sought	No
Class action status granted	No
Prevailing Party	Defendant
Public Int. Lawyer	Yes
Nature of Relief	None
Source of Relief	None
Case Closing Year	2004
Case Ongoing	No

Additional Resources


	Microsoft Gender Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit Date: Oct. 14, 2016 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Age Discrimination Class Action seeks Fair Employment for Older PwC Applicants http://www.pwcagecase.com/ Date: Apr. 27, 2016 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Smith Barney Gender Discrimination https://www.lieffcabraser.com/employment/smith-barney/ Date: August 2008 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform Date: Mar. 1, 2008 By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law Faculty) Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach Date: Apr. 1, 2001 By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School Faculty) Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Documents

Docket(s)

5:03-cv-00150-RHB (W.D. Mich.)
EE-MI-0138-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/09/2006
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]

General Documents

Complaint EE-MI-0138-0001.pdf \| Detail Date: 09/29/2003
Intervenor's Complaint and Jury Demand EE-MI-0138-0002.pdf \| Detail Date: 12/17/2003
Opinion and Order on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (W.D. Mich.) EE-MI-0138-0003.pdf \| Detail Date: 10/21/2004
Opinion and Order on Plaintiff EEOC's Motion for Reconsideration (W.D. Mich.) EE-MI-0138-0004.pdf \| Detail Date: 04/28/2005
Order [Court of Appeals - Remanded to District Court] (169 Fed.Appx. 942) EE-MI-0138-0006.pdf \| WESTLAW\| LEXIS \| Detail Date: 02/21/2006
Jury Verdict EE-MI-0138-0005.pdf \| Detail Date: 09/21/2006

People