Case: EEOC v. NORVELL & WALACE, INC.

3:02-cv-00951 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee

Filed Date: Oct. 2, 2002

Closed Date: May 25, 2004

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In October 2002, the EEOC district office in Memphis, Tennessee brought this suit against the Norvell & Wallace, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. The complaint is currently unavailable. A consent decree was approved and entered in May 2004. The consent decree is currently unavailable.

Summary Authors

Jason Chester (6/16/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

3:02-cv-00951

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Norvell & Wallace

May 25, 2004

May 25, 2004

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 22, 2024, 3:08 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT (No Summons(es) issued) (vh) (Entered: 10/07/2002)

Oct. 2, 2002

Oct. 2, 2002

2

NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference: Case Management Conference is set for 10:30 a.m. on 11/25/02 ; Case referred to Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles. (vh) (Entered: 10/07/2002)

Oct. 2, 2002

Oct. 2, 2002

3

ORDER by Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles: Initial Case Management Conference is rescheduled for 1:30 p.m. on 12/2/02. Counsel for pltfs shall serve a copy of this order on any defts who have not yet entered an appearance. (cc: all counsel) EOD 11/4/02 (vh) (Entered: 11/04/2002)

Nov. 1, 2002

Nov. 1, 2002

4

WAIVER OF SERVICE received by deft Norvell & Wallace on 10/18/02 (vh) (Entered: 11/26/2002)

Nov. 25, 2002

Nov. 25, 2002

PROPOSED Case Management Order (vh) (Entered: 11/26/2002)

Nov. 26, 2002

Nov. 26, 2002

5

CLERK'S RESUME: Initial Case Management Conference held 12/2/02 by telephone. Proposed CMO submitted; parties wish to postpone proceedings for approximately 30 days; second CMC to be scheduled. Order to enter. C/R : Taped (vh) (Entered: 12/03/2002)

Dec. 2, 2002

Dec. 2, 2002

6

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles: Deft shall have until 1/10/03 to file a motion to stay proceedings. Pltf shall have until 3/3/03 to move to amend its complaint. A discovery completion ddl shall be established at the second CMC. (cc: all counsel) EOD 12/3/02 (vh) (Entered: 12/03/2002)

Dec. 2, 2002

Dec. 2, 2002

7

ORDER by Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles: A Case Management Conference is set for 10:00 a.m. on 3/10/03. The hearing shall be conducted by telephone conference, to be initiated by counsel for pltf. Counsel for pltf shall serve a copy of this order on any defts who have not yet entered an appearance. (cc: all counsel) EOD 12/5/02 (vh) Modified on 01/30/2003 (Entered: 12/05/2002)

Dec. 4, 2002

Dec. 4, 2002

8

ANSWER by deft Norvell & Wallace to [1-1] (vh) (Entered: 12/10/2002)

Dec. 9, 2002

Dec. 9, 2002

10

MOTION by deft Norvell & Wallace to stay proceedings and order adequate conciliation pursuant to 42 USC Section 2000e-5(b) (vh) (Entered: 12/20/2002)

Dec. 20, 2002

Dec. 20, 2002

11

MEMORANDUM OF LAW by deft Norvell & Wallace in support of motion to stay proceedings [10-1] and order adequate conciliation pursuant to 42 USC Section 2000e-5(b) [10-2] (vh) (Entered: 12/20/2002)

Dec. 20, 2002

Dec. 20, 2002

12

AFFIDAVIT of J. Kevin Hughart re [10-1], [10-2] (w/attachments) (vh) (Entered: 12/20/2002)

Dec. 20, 2002

Dec. 20, 2002

13

MOTION by pltf EEOC for extension of time to respond to deft's motion to stay proceedings and order adequate conciliation pursuant to 42 USC Section 2000e-5(b) (w/att'd proposed order) (vh) (Entered: 01/07/2003)

Jan. 6, 2003

Jan. 6, 2003

14

ORDER by Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles granting pltf's motion for extension of time to respond to deft's motion to stay proceedings and order adequate conciliation pursuant to 42 USC Section 2000e-5(b) [13-1]. Pltf shall have 2 weeks to respond to deft's motion to stay proceedings [10-1] and order adequate conciliation pursuant to 42 USC Section 2000e-5(b) [10-2]. (cc: all counsel) EOD 1/9/03 (vh) (Entered: 01/09/2003)

Jan. 8, 2003

Jan. 8, 2003

15

RESPONSE by pltf EEOC in opposition to motion to stay proceedings [10-1] and order adequate conciliation pursuant to 42 USC Section 2000e-5(b) [10-2] (vh) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

Jan. 22, 2003

Jan. 22, 2003

16

MEMORANDUM by pltf EEOC in support of response in opposition to deft's motion to stay proceedings and order adequate conciliation pursuant to 42 USC Section 2000e-5(b) [15-1] (vh) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

Jan. 22, 2003

Jan. 22, 2003

17

AFFIDAVIT of Phyllis D. Ellis re [15-1] (w/attachments) (vh) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

Jan. 22, 2003

Jan. 22, 2003

18

AFFIDAVIT of Lu Ann Hawk re [15-1] (w/attachments) (vh) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

Jan. 22, 2003

Jan. 22, 2003

19

MOTION by deft Norvell & Wallace for permission to submit a reply to pltf's response in opposition to stay proceedings and order adequate conciliation (w/att'd reply) (vh) (Entered: 02/03/2003)

Jan. 31, 2003

Jan. 31, 2003

20

ORDER by Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles granting deft's motion for permission to submit a reply to pltf's response in opposition to stay proceedings and order adequate conciliation [19-1]. (cc: all counsel) EOD 2/18/03 (vh) (Entered: 02/18/2003)

Feb. 14, 2003

Feb. 14, 2003

21

REPLY by deft Norvell & Wallace to response to motion to stay proceedings [10-1] and order adequate conciliation pursuant to 42 USC Section 2000e-5(b) [10-2] (vh) (Entered: 02/18/2003)

Feb. 18, 2003

Feb. 18, 2003

22

CLERK'S RESUME: Case Management Conference held 3/10/03 by telephone. Parties will contact the Court for further CMC if necessary after Judge Nixon rules on pending mtn to stay and order adequate conciliation. (vh) (Entered: 03/11/2003)

March 10, 2003

March 10, 2003

24

ORDER by Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles: A Case Management Conference is set for 11:30 a.m. on 5/8/03 to be conducted by telephone, to be initiated by counsel for pltf. (cc: all counsel) EOD 4/25/03 (vh) (Entered: 04/25/2003)

April 25, 2003

April 25, 2003

25

CLERK'S RESUME: Case Management Conference held 5/8/03. Proposed CMO submitted; discovery ddl 10/31/03; dispositive mtn ddl 30 days thereafter; Order to enter. (vh) (Entered: 05/09/2003)

May 8, 2003

May 8, 2003

26

REVISED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles: Discovery deadline 10/31/03; Dispositive motion filing deadline 30 days thereafter discovery deadline. (cc: all counsel) EOD 5/9/03 (vh) (Entered: 05/09/2003)

May 8, 2003

May 8, 2003

27

MOTION by pltf EEOC for a protective order . (w/ att'd proposed order) (dlt) (Entered: 08/12/2003)

Aug. 11, 2003

Aug. 11, 2003

28

MEMORANDUM by pltf EEOC in support of motion for a protective order [27-1]. (dlt) (Entered: 08/12/2003)

Aug. 11, 2003

Aug. 11, 2003

29

RESPONSE and MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION by deft Norvell & Wallace to motion for a protective order [27-1] (w/att'd appendix) (vh) (Entered: 08/19/2003)

Aug. 19, 2003

Aug. 19, 2003

30

RETURN OF SERVICE of subpoena issued to Jada Bradley by USM on 8/27/03 (vh) (Entered: 08/29/2003)

Aug. 29, 2003

Aug. 29, 2003

31

JOINR MOTION by parties for protective order (w/att'd proposed order) (vh) (Entered: 12/02/2003)

Dec. 1, 2003

Dec. 1, 2003

32

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles: The joint motion for protective order [31-1] is granted. All documents and information concerning deft's net worth and all federal tax returns filed by deft during the past year shall be treated confidentially and shall not be revealed by pltf. (cc: all counsel) EOD 12/10/03 (vh) (Entered: 12/10/2003)

Dec. 9, 2003

Dec. 9, 2003

33

ORDER by Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles: Pltf has not shown good cause for the issuance of a protective order. Pltf' motion for a protective order [27-1] is therefore denied. (cc: all counsel) EOD 1/23/04 (vh) (Entered: 01/23/2004)

Jan. 22, 2004

Jan. 22, 2004

34

OBJECTIONS by pltf EEOC to the order entered by Magistrate Judge Knowles denying pltf's motion for a protective order [33-1] (w/attachments) (vh) Modified on 02/04/2004 (Entered: 02/04/2004)

Feb. 4, 2004

Feb. 4, 2004

35

RESPONSE by deft Norvell & Wallace in opposition to pltf's objections to the denial of its motion for a protective order [34-1] (vh) (Entered: 02/11/2004)

Feb. 11, 2004

Feb. 11, 2004

36

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Joe B. Brown: A settlement conference is set for 9:30 a.m. on 4/14/04. By 12:00 p.m. on 4/12/04 pltf and deft shall deliver under seal directly to the courtroom deputy separate settlement conference statements which shall specify their respective settlement positions. (cc: all counsel) EOD 3/8/04 (vh) (Entered: 03/08/2004)

March 8, 2004

March 8, 2004

37

ORDER by Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles: This action is referred to Magistrate Judge Brown for a settlement conference. A separate order will be issued by Magistrate Judge Brown setting forth the requirements of the parties prior to the hearing. (cc: all counsel) EOD 3/10/04 (vh) (Entered: 03/10/2004)

March 10, 2004

March 10, 2004

38

JOINT MOTION by parties requesting that this case be set for trial (vh) (Entered: 03/11/2004)

March 10, 2004

March 10, 2004

39

ORDER by Judge John T. Nixon granting motion joint requesting that this case be set for trial [38-1]. Jury trial is set for 9:00 a.m. on 8/3/04. Pretrial conference is set for 10:30 a.m. on 7/23/04. (cc: all counsel) EOD 3/18/04 (vh) (Entered: 03/18/2004)

March 18, 2004

March 18, 2004

40

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Joe B. Brown: Settlement conference held on 4/14/04 . Parties were able to reach an agreement statisfactory to both sides. Clerk is directed to return the file to the District Judge for the entry of the consent decree upon its filing by the parties; terminating case referral to Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles . EOD 4/15/04 (cc: all counsel) (dlt) (Entered: 04/15/2004)

April 15, 2004

April 15, 2004

PROPOSED Consent Decree (dlt) (Entered: 05/18/2004)

May 18, 2004

May 18, 2004

41

ORDER by Judge John T. Nixon: The parties have agreed to this consent decree to settle all of the claims involved in this lawsuit. The Court has reviewed the terms of this decree in light of th eapplicable laws & regulations, & hereby approves this decree as set out in this order; terminating case . EOD 5/25/04 (cc: all counsel) (dlt) (Entered: 05/25/2004)

May 25, 2004

May 25, 2004

Case Details

State / Territory: Tennessee

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Oct. 2, 2002

Closing Date: May 25, 2004

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Norvell & Wallace, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits