Case: EEOC v. G.E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc.

2:02-cv-00276 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky

Filed Date: Dec. 9, 2002

Closed Date: Feb. 23, 2006

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Indianapolis and Louisville Offices of the EEOC filed this action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. The Defendant was G.E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc., a division of General Electric. The lawsuit was filed in December 2002 and was resolved through a consent decree in February 2004. Because the docket is the only accessible document, there is no information available on the nature of the suit or the settlement agreement.

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (8/10/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:02-cv-00276

Docket [PACER]

Feb. 23, 2004

Feb. 23, 2004

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated April 2, 2024, 3:11 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT ( 1 summons(es) issued) with copy, Fee Paid $ waived, Receipt No. waived (JMM) (Entered: 12/11/2002)

Dec. 9, 2002

Dec. 9, 2002

3

ANSWER by defendant G E Capital Info Tec to Plaintiff's Complaint [1-1] (JMM) (Entered: 01/06/2003)

Jan. 6, 2003

Jan. 6, 2003

4

MOTION for David T. Croall to Appear Pro Hac Vice by G. E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc. with attached Affidavit (Filing fee $65; receipt number 104879.) (JMM) (Entered: 03/28/2003)

March 27, 2003

March 27, 2003

5

ORDER granting [4] Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for David T. Croall. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman. (JMM) (Entered: 04/03/2003)

April 3, 2003

April 3, 2003

6

ORDER Docket Call set for 5/13/2003 01:00 PM in Covington before William O. Bertelsman. Signed by Judge J. Gregory Wehrman. (JMM) (Entered: 04/29/2003)

April 29, 2003

April 29, 2003

7

JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN DISCL0SURES by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, G. E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc..(JMM) (Entered: 05/08/2003)

May 8, 2003

May 8, 2003

8

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William O. Bertelsman : Docket Call. The Court adopts the parties' proposed joint discovery plan. Plaintiff identify experts by 9/1/2003; Defendant identify experts by 10/31/2003. Add additional parties or Amend Pleadings due by 8/1/2003. Discovery due by 12/31/2003. Dispositive Motions due by 2/13/2004. Joint Proposed Discovery due by 6/1/2004. Response to Dispositive Motions due by 3/15/2004; any replies are due by 3/29/2004. Status Report due by 12/31/2003. Discovery referred to Mag. Judge Wehrman per Order of Reference entered concurrently herewith. (Court Reporter Joan Averdick.) (JMM) (Entered: 05/14/2003)

May 13, 2003

May 13, 2003

9

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge J. Gregory Wehrman to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman. (JMM) (Entered: 05/14/2003)

May 14, 2003

May 14, 2003

10

NOTICE of Appearance by Johanna Philhower Maple on behalf of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (LMB) (Entered: 08/18/2003)

Aug. 18, 2003

Aug. 18, 2003

11

CONSENT DECREE ORDER DISMISSING CASE - The court shall retain jurisdiction of this action for a period of two years after entry of this Decree. This Decree shall expire by its own terms at the end of two (2) years without further acton by the parties. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman. (JMM)cc: COR (Entered: 02/23/2004)

Feb. 23, 2004

Feb. 23, 2004

Case Details

State / Territory: Kentucky

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 9, 2002

Closing Date: Feb. 23, 2006

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

G.E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits