EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated | Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

Case Profile		new search page permalink

Case Name	EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated	EE-NM-0016
Docket / Court	1:01-cv-00473-MCA-LFG ( D.N.M. )
State/Territory	New Mexico
Case Type(s)	Equal Employment
Special Collection	IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study
Attorney Organization	EEOC
Case Summary	On April 27, 2001, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"), on behalf of a female employee, filed a lawsuit in the District Court of New Mexico, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, against Brink's, Incorporated. The EEOC sought ... read more > On April 27, 2001, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"), on behalf of a female employee, filed a lawsuit in the District Court of New Mexico, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, against Brink's, Incorporated. The EEOC sought injunctive relief, compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorneys' fees, and other forms of affirmative relief, claiming that the defendant denied the complainant a promotion to an Assistant Manager position because of her sex. On May 10, 2001, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint. On December 5, 2002, the District Court (Judge M. Christina Armijo) entered a consent decree where the defendant, among other things, agreed to pay the complainant $58,750. Perry Miska - 04/13/2014 compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -

Issues and Causes of Action

Issues

Affected Gender

Female

Content of Injunction

Discrimination Prohibition

Neutral/Positive Reference

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Retaliation Prohibition

Discrimination-area

Promotion

Discrimination-basis

Sex discrimination

EEOC-centric

Direct Suit on Merits

General

Disparate Treatment

Plaintiff Type

EEOC Plaintiff

Causes of Action

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Case Details


Defendant(s)	Brink's Incorporated
Plaintiff Description	EEOC on behalf of female worker alleging discrimination based on sex.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations	EEOC
Class action status sought	No
Class action status granted	No
Filed Pro Se	No
Prevailing Party	Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer	Yes
Nature of Relief	Damages Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief	Settlement
Form of Settlement	Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration	2002 - 2004
Filed	04/27/2001
Case Closing Year	2002
Case Ongoing	No

Additional Resources


	See this case at CourtListener.com (May provide additional documents and, for active cases, real-time alerts)

Documents


Court	Docket(s)
D.N.M. 01/17/2003	1:01−cv−00473 EE-NM-0016-9000.pdf \| Detail Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
	General Documents
D.N.M. 04/27/2001	Complaint [ECF# 1] EE-NM-0016-0002.pdf \| Detail Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.N.M. 05/10/2001	Amended Complaint [ECF# 2] EE-NM-0016-0003.pdf \| Detail Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.N.M. 12/05/2002	Consent Decree [ECF# 89] EE-NM-0016-0001.pdf \| Detail Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]

People


Judges	Armijo, M. Christina (D.N.M.) show/hide docs EE-NM-0016-0001 \| EE-NM-0016-9000
Plaintiff's Lawyers	Medina, Loretta (New Mexico) show/hide docs EE-NM-0016-0001 \| EE-NM-0016-0003 \| EE-NM-0016-9000 Molina, Veronica A. (Arizona) show/hide docs EE-NM-0016-0001 \| EE-NM-0016-9000 O'Neill, Mary Jo (Arizona) show/hide docs EE-NM-0016-0001 Padegimas, Sandra (Arizona) show/hide docs EE-NM-0016-0002 \| EE-NM-0016-0003 \| EE-NM-0016-9000 Reams, Gwendolyn Young (District of Columbia) show/hide docs EE-NM-0016-9000 Smith, C. Emanuel (Alabama) show/hide docs EE-NM-0016-0001 \| EE-NM-0016-0002 \| EE-NM-0016-9000
Defendant's Lawyers	Baldwin, Kimberly G. (New York) show/hide docs EE-NM-0016-0001 Kellett, James E. (New York) show/hide docs EE-NM-0016-0001 \| EE-NM-0016-9000 Vance, Claud Eugene (New Mexico) show/hide docs EE-NM-0016-9000