Case: EEOC v. MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS, INC.

1:04-cv-00421 | U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii

Filed Date: July 14, 2004

Closed Date: Jan. 12, 2008

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In July 2004, the Honolulu Local Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Marriott Ownership Resort, Inc., doing business as Marriott Vacations Club International, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations are unknown. The parties settled the lawsuit through a consent decree shortly after the defendant filed an answer to the complaint. We do not have a copy of the consent decree; therefore, the exact remedy involved is unknown.

Summary Authors

Daisy Manning (11/8/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:04-cv-00421

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc.

Jan. 19, 2005

Jan. 19, 2005

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 18, 2024, 3:04 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
2

ORDER by Judge David A. Ezra rule 16 conference set for 9:00 10/18/04 before Mag Judge Barry M. Kurren (afc) (Entered: 07/15/2004)

July 14, 2004

July 14, 2004

3

SUMMONS issued to "all named defendants" (afc) (Entered: 07/15/2004)

July 14, 2004

July 14, 2004

4

RETURN OF SERVICE - service of complaint and summons executed via mail & by facsimile to defendant Marriot Ownership Resorts, Inc. c/o Mr. Gregory Sato, Topa Financial Center, 700 Bishop Street Fl. 15, Honolulu, HI. 96813; date: 07/27/04 (afc) (Entered: 08/02/2004)

July 28, 2004

July 28, 2004

5

RETURN OF SERVICE - service of complaint and summons executed via mail & by facsimile to defendant Marriot International, Inc. c/o Mr. Gregory Sato, Topa Financial Center, 700 Bishop Street Fl. 15, Honolulu, HI. 96813; date: 07/27/04 (afc) (Entered: 08/02/2004)

July 28, 2004

July 28, 2004

6

STIPULATION to extend time to answer or otherwise plead to complaint filed July 14, 2004 ; ORDER by Judge David A. Ezra [defendants Marriott Ownwership Resorts, Inc., and Marriott International, Incorporated shall have up to and including August 31, 2004 within which to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint] (afc) (Entered: 08/02/2004)

July 28, 2004

July 28, 2004

7

ANSWER by defendant Marriot Owner Resort, defendant Marriott Intl Inc. to complaint [1-1] filed on July 14, 2004; and certificate of service (eps) (Entered: 09/01/2004)

Aug. 31, 2004

Aug. 31, 2004

8

EO: Continued : [Rule 16 Scheduling Conference] from 10/18/2004 09:00:00 AM to 11/08/2004 09:00:00 AM before BMK. Mediation set for 10/13/2004. Lorraine from Sato's office to notify parties. () JUDGE Mag Judge Barry M. Kurren (afc) (Entered: 09/15/2004)

Sept. 13, 2004

Sept. 13, 2004

9

EO: Continued : [Rule 16 Scheduling Conference] from 11/08/2004 09:00:00 AM to 12/07/2004 09:00:00 AM before BMK. Lorraine from Sato's office to notify parties. () JUDGE Mag Judge Barry M. Kurren (afc) (Entered: 10/15/2004)

Oct. 13, 2004

Oct. 13, 2004

10

EO: Case settled per Gregory Sato. Status Conference Re Dismissal set for 1-20-05 @ 9 a.m., BMK. Notified Gregory Sato, Wilfredo Tungol () JUDGE Mag Judge Barry M. Kurren (afc) (Entered: 11/26/2004)

Nov. 23, 2004

Nov. 23, 2004

11

NOTICE OF LIEN; certificate of service - ["...Marnie L. McClain, and G. Todd Withy ("Lienor") in her claim against Marriott International, Incorporated...claims a lien against any verdict, decision, decree award, settlement, judgment or final order made rendered in this action...."] (afc) (Entered: 12/13/2004)

Dec. 10, 2004

Dec. 10, 2004

12

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL of lien claimant G. Todd Withy's notice of lien filed December 10, 2004; certificate of service [11-1] (afc) (Entered: 01/06/2005)

Jan. 5, 2005

Jan. 5, 2005

13

CONSENT DECREE by Judge David A. Ezra - filed by plaintiff [(1) This consent decree shall terminate 3 years from the day of entry by the Court. EEOC reserves the right to petition this Court for an extension of the Decree because of noncomplaince by defendants. If EEOC determines that a defendant has not complied with the consent decree, EEOC will provide written notification of the alleged breach to defendants and will not petition the Court for enforcement sooner than 60 days after providing written notifiction. The 60 day period following written notice shall be used by the parties for good faith efforts to resolve the issue. If EEOC petitions the Court and the Court finds a defendant to be in substantial violation of the terms of the Decree, the Court may provide whatever relief it deems proper. (2) This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action for the purposes of enforcing the provisions of this Consent Decree. This Consent Decree shall expire by its own terms at the end of 3 years without further action by the parties] (afc) (Entered: 01/17/2005)

Jan. 12, 2005

Jan. 12, 2005

14

EO: Status Conference Re Dismissal set for 01/20/2005 09:00:00 AM before BMK is taken off the calendar per Wilfredo Tungol. Per Tungol, a Consent Decree was signed by DAE. Tungol to notify parties. () JUDGE Mag Judge Barry M. Kurren (afc) (Entered: 01/20/2005)

Jan. 18, 2005

Jan. 18, 2005

15

SUBMISSION by plaintiff of original signatures on page 16 of consent decree [13-1]; certificate of service (afc) (Entered: 01/20/2005)

Jan. 19, 2005

Jan. 19, 2005

Case Details

State / Territory: Hawaii

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study

Key Dates

Filing Date: July 14, 2004

Closing Date: Jan. 12, 2008

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Unknown

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

Marriot Ownership Resorts, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Marriott International, Incorporated, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit