University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name EEOC v. NEWMARK & COMPANY REAL ESTATE, INC., & KALABI REAL EE-NY-0115
Docket / Court 1:96-cv-09091-BSJ ( S.D.N.Y. )
State/Territory New York
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization EEOC
Case Summary
In December 1996, the New York office of the EEOC brought this Title VII suit against Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc. and Kalabi Realty Company in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged that the defendant discriminated against the claimants by ... read more >
In December 1996, the New York office of the EEOC brought this Title VII suit against Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc. and Kalabi Realty Company in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged that the defendant discriminated against the claimants by subjecting them to harassment, denying them equal terms and conditions of employment and discharging them in retaliation of their complaints of race and national origin discrimination (black and Hispanic). After the court denied the defendant's 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss, the case settled by entry of a consent decree in January 1998. The consent decree required the defendant to pay $40,000 to the claimants. No other information was made available pertaining to the consent decree.

Kevin Wilemon - 07/18/2007


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Discrimination-area
Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff
Harassment / Hostile Work Environment
Discrimination-basis
National origin discrimination
Race discrimination
EEOC-centric
Direct Suit on Merits
General
Disparate Treatment
Retaliation
National Origin/Ethnicity
Indian
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Race
Black
Causes of Action Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000e
Defendant(s) Kalabi Realty Company
Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc.
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations EEOC
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Damages
Source of Relief Settlement
Form of Settlement Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Case Closing Year 1998
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Microsoft Gender Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit
Date: Oct. 14, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Age Discrimination Class Action seeks Fair Employment for Older PwC Applicants
http://www.pwcagecase.com/
Date: Apr. 27, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Smith Barney Gender Discrimination
https://www.lieffcabraser.com/employment/smith-barney/
Date: August 2008
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Date: Mar. 1, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
1:96-cv-09091-BSJ (S.D.N.Y.)
EE-NY-0115-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/08/1998
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint
EE-NY-0115-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/02/1996
Memorandum and Order (1997 WL 324066 / 1997 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 8341) (S.D.N.Y.)
EE-NY-0115-0002.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 06/13/1997

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -