Case: EEOC v. VENATOR GROUP RETAIL, INC. dba FOOTLOCKER

2:99-cv-01846 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California

Filed Date: Sept. 21, 1999

Closed Date: Sept. 28, 2000

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In September 1999, the EEOC district office in San Francisco, California brought this suit against Venator Group Retail, Inc., (Footlocker), a national shoe retailer, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. The complaint is currently unavailable. The parties settled in August 2000 and a stipulation for dismissal was granted in September. No settlement documentation is currently available.

Summary Authors

Jason Chester (7/5/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:99-cv-01846

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Venator Group

Sept. 28, 2000

Sept. 28, 2000

Docket
7

2:99-cv-01846

Stipulation re: Protective Order

EEOC v. Venator Group Retail, Inc. dba "Footlocker"

March 7, 2000

March 7, 2000

Order/Opinion
15

2:99-cv-01846

Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice

EEOC v. Venator Group Retail, Inc. dba "Footlocker"

Sept. 28, 2000

Sept. 28, 2000

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 27, 2024, 3:22 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT for civil rights-employment discrimination; jury demand, fee status waived, assigned to Judge Garland E. Burrell referred to Magistrate Judge Peter A. Nowinski (old) (Entered: 09/22/1999)

Sept. 21, 1999

Sept. 21, 1999

2

DISCOVERY ORDER by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Nowinski informing the parties on the procedure to follow in this action (old) (Entered: 09/22/1999)

Sept. 21, 1999

Sept. 21, 1999

3

ORDER setting scheduling conference for 9:00 12/13/99 before Judge Garland E. Burrell (old) (Entered: 09/22/1999)

Sept. 21, 1999

Sept. 21, 1999

4

ANSWER by defendant Venator Group (old) (Entered: 10/20/1999)

Oct. 19, 1999

Oct. 19, 1999

5

JOINT STATUS REPORT submitted by EEOC (old) (Entered: 11/24/1999)

Nov. 24, 1999

Nov. 24, 1999

6

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING scheduling conference vacated on 12/2/99; discovery ddl set for 12/20/00; motion filing ddl set for 9:00 2/20/01; final pretrial conference set for 3:30 4/30/01; trial set for 9:00 7/31/01 (cc: all counsel) (kdc) (Entered: 12/02/1999)

Dec. 2, 1999

Dec. 2, 1999

LODGED stipulation re protective order; order thereon by defendant Venator Group (ljr) (Entered: 03/03/2000)

March 3, 2000

March 3, 2000

7

STIPULATION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Nowinski for protective order GANTED; this order is subject to modification by court order pursuant to motion procedure by either party (cc: all counsel) (ljr) (Entered: 03/07/2000)

March 7, 2000

March 7, 2000

LODGED Stipulation to elect referral of action to ENE pursuant to Local Rule 16-271 by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Venator Group (pb) (Entered: 05/23/2000)

May 22, 2000

May 22, 2000

8

STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell Stipulation to elect referral of action to ENE [0-0] GRANTED Case REFERRED to ENE (cc: all counsel) (pb) (Entered: 05/24/2000)

May 24, 2000

May 24, 2000

9

COURT LETTER from J Del Pero Richard J Chiurazzi appointed as Evaluator, ENE follow up report due by 10/2/00 ; (cc: all counsel) (old) (Entered: 06/01/2000)

June 1, 2000

June 1, 2000

10

NOTICE of ENE results by Richard J Chiurazzi case is settled before Magistrate Judge Peter A. Nowinski (old) (Entered: 08/11/2000)

Aug. 11, 2000

Aug. 11, 2000

11

LETTER to court from EEOC the attorneys representing both sides have indicated that the case has settled with some minor details which need to be worked out; it is my suggestion that you give the parties 30 days to file final disposition documents (old) (Entered: 08/14/2000)

Aug. 14, 2000

Aug. 14, 2000

12

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING that pursuant to the representations of the ENE [11-1] the court has determined that this case is settled; a stipulation of dismissal shall be filed within 30 days of the date this order is filed; however no previously set dated in this matter will be vacated unless the stipulation is filed as ordered (cc: all counsel) (old) (Entered: 08/14/2000)

Aug. 14, 2000

Aug. 14, 2000

13

LETTER to court from counsel for plaintiff EEOC regarding settlement and disposition (old) (Entered: 09/14/2000)

Sept. 13, 2000

Sept. 13, 2000

14

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING pursuant to pltf's request of 9/15/00, parties have until 9/25/00 to file stip for dismissal (cc: all counsel) (ds) (Entered: 09/19/2000)

Sept. 19, 2000

Sept. 19, 2000

LODGED Stip and Order of dismissal w/prejudice (ds) (Entered: 09/27/2000)

Sept. 26, 2000

Sept. 26, 2000

15

STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell stipulation and order of dismissal with prejudice is GRANTED CASE DISMISSED (cc: all counsel) (old) (Entered: 09/28/2000)

Sept. 28, 2000

Sept. 28, 2000

Case Details

State / Territory: California

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 21, 1999

Closing Date: Sept. 28, 2000

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Venator Group Retail, Inc. (Fairfield, California), Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits