EEOC v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation | Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

Case Profile		new search page permalink

Case Name	EEOC v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation	EE-MO-0025
Docket / Court	4:05-cv-00778-CEJ ( E.D. Mo. )
State/Territory	Missouri
Case Type(s)	Disability Rights-Pub. Accom. Equal Employment
Special Collection	EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization	EEOC
Case Summary	The St. Louis District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against DiamlerChrysler, which operates an automotive plant outside of St. Louis, in May of 2005, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The EEOC alleged Chrysler discriminated against the complainant in ... read more > The St. Louis District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against DiamlerChrysler, which operates an automotive plant outside of St. Louis, in May of 2005, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The EEOC alleged Chrysler discriminated against the complainant in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, when they failed to give him a reasonable accommodation and discharged him due to his disability. The complainant intervened. The case was ordered to mediation, which proved to be unsuccessful. Chrysler filed an unsuccessful motion for summary judgment. On the day the trial was scheduled to begin, the parties reached a settlement agreement and the case was dismissed on January 5, 2007. The documents given to us did not include any details about the settlement. Alex Bean - 06/26/2007 compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -

Issues and Causes of Action

Issues

Discrimination-area

Accommodation / Leave

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Discrimination-basis

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

EEOC-centric

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit

General

Disparate Treatment

Plaintiff Type

EEOC Plaintiff

Private Plaintiff

Causes of Action

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Case Details


Defendant(s)	DaimlerChrysler Corporation
Plaintiff Description	Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations	EEOC
Class action status sought	No
Class action status granted	No
Prevailing Party	Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer	Yes
Nature of Relief	Unknown
Source of Relief	Settlement
Form of Settlement	Voluntary Dismissal
Case Closing Year	2007
Case Ongoing	No

Additional Resources


	Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform Date: Mar 1, 2008 By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law) Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School) Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Documents

Docket(s)

4:05-cv-00778-CEJ (E.D. Mo.)
EE-MO-0025-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/05/2007
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]

General Documents

Complaint EE-MO-0025-0001.pdf \| Detail Date: 05/16/2005
Complaint [Plaintiff-Intervenor] EE-MO-0025-0002.pdf \| Detail Date: 08/15/2005
Plaintiff-Intervenor Christopher Heman's First Amended Complaint [ECF# 14] EE-MO-0025-0003.pdf \| Detail Date: 10/26/2005 Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [Regarding Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel] [ECF# 38] (E.D. Mo.) EE-MO-0025-0004.pdf \| Detail Date: 07/24/2006 Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Memorandum and Order [Regarding Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment] (2006 WL 3360629) (E.D. Mo.) EE-MO-0025-0005.pdf \| WESTLAW \| Detail Date: 11/20/2006

People