EEOC v. SANCHEZ & DANIELS | Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

Case Profile		new search page permalink

Case Name	EEOC v. SANCHEZ & DANIELS	EE-IL-0196
Docket / Court	1:03-cv-05822 ( N.D. Ill. )
State/Territory	Illinois
Case Type(s)	Equal Employment
Special Collection	EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization	EEOC
Case Summary	The EEOC's Chicago district office sued Sanchez & Daniels on August 19, 2003 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The EEOC alleged that Sanchez & Daniels violated Title VII when it discriminated against one of its employees based on sex (female) by providing a hostile ... read more > The EEOC's Chicago district office sued Sanchez & Daniels on August 19, 2003 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The EEOC alleged that Sanchez & Daniels violated Title VII when it discriminated against one of its employees based on sex (female) by providing a hostile work environment. The parties entered into a consent decree on September 16, 2003 which stipulated that the defendant would pay the complainant $42,500 in damages, fees, and costs; read a notice of EEO rights to its employees; implement training concerning sexual discrimination; maintain records of employee complaints and report these to the EEOC semiannually. Aaron Weismann - 06/15/2007 compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -

Issues and Causes of Action

Issues

Affected Gender

Female

Content of Injunction

Auditing

Discrimination Prohibition

Provide antidiscrimination training

Recordkeeping

Reporting

Retaliation Prohibition

Discrimination-area

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination-basis

Sex discrimination

EEOC-centric

Direct Suit on Merits

General

Disparate Treatment

Plaintiff Type

EEOC Plaintiff

Causes of Action

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Case Details


Defendant(s)	Sanchez & Daniels
Plaintiff Description	Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations	EEOC
Class action status sought	No
Class action status granted	No
Prevailing Party	Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer	Yes
Nature of Relief	Damages Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief	Settlement
Form of Settlement	Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration	2003 - 2005
Case Closing Year	2003
Case Ongoing	No

Additional Resources


	Microsoft Gender Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit Date: Oct. 14, 2016 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Age Discrimination Class Action seeks Fair Employment for Older PwC Applicants http://www.pwcagecase.com/ Date: Apr. 27, 2016 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Smith Barney Gender Discrimination https://www.lieffcabraser.com/employment/smith-barney/ Date: August 2008 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform Date: Mar. 1, 2008 By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law) Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School) Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Documents

Docket(s)

1:03-cv-05822 (N.D. Ill.)
EE-IL-0196-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 09/16/2003
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]

General Documents

Complaint EE-IL-0196-0001.pdf \| Detail Date: 08/19/2003 Source: District Court
Consent Decree EE-IL-0196-0002.pdf \| Detail Date: 09/16/2003

People